
sweetbeats
Reel deep thoughts...
I forgot to mention that the ^(*#@$%& hood for the 37-pin dsub connector for the Tascam end of the sync cable is to fat to fit in the recess in the back of the BR-20T...
I'll have to find a different hood. I took it off for now but I'm not comfortable leaving it that way.
Danny, I've been reading the Microlynx manual and wow...it just keeps getting better. A real gem of electronic engineering if you ask me. And, yes, I see where your frustration about the technical nature of the writing in the manual comes from...it is not for the average home recordist just getting into synchronization, but it reads WAY better than the manual for the Tascam ES-50/51 which was a frustrating surprise to me when I was trying to learn how to use mine. The Microlynx manual does have a pretty decent way of getting you up and running with the basics, but when you get into the detailed keyboard instructions it gets deep. But the system itself is just cool the way you select machines to a group, select the master...the ability to program macros for common functions...once you get familiar with the keyboard it is actually quite intuitive. The last synchronizer I will ever need for sure. Folks, if you are in the market for a synchronizer to slave your tape deck or multiple tape decks to MTC or you just want to chase-lock machines, seriously consider the Timeline Microlynx...it is IT and they can be had for a relative song. Very well-designed unit.
Danny, if timecode is the master (in other words when viewing the Group the "T" is the first in the group and capitalized), does that include then incoming MTC at the MIDI IN jack and as long as the MIDI IN jack is configured in the system setup to read MTC then the Microlynx will happily chase-lock all connected transports to that MTC as long as the group is setup properly?
I had a chance to test out some of the functions of the Microlynx last night after striping a reel of tape and just the autolocate functions alone make the Microlynx worth the price of admission...the only thing (so far) I couldn't get it to make the BR do properly was to JOG backwards...it'll SHUTTLE forward and backward but it will only JOG forward. The transport acts like it tries to jog back but the transport appears confused. Anyway, just skimming the surface and I'm sure I'll figure out the answer to that one eventually.
Another plus for the BR-20T transport: I am shocked at how quickly it resolves to a new timecode position...the overshoot is so minimal. Way different than my 58 was with the ES-50/51, though I was never able to set the ES-50 to the specific characteristics of the 58 because the ES-50 needs to have two machines connected in order to complete the auto-setup procedure.
But the Microlynx seamlessly and transparently figures all that stuff out (dynamic characteristics, responsiveness, etc.) and the BR-20T is able to respond so well to the instructions.
Tim, BTW, I meant to comment on your BR-20T vs. ATR60-2T thoughts and yes I think you would be just tickled with either one. The ATR60 likely has a bit more robust transport but the BR may actually be a better *sounding* deck but that is totally subjective and based on other's comments that may or may not be reputable...I think you'll have an easier time finding the BR though.
ALSO...Tim, here are spec sheets on the pins, receptacles and hoods for the Microlynx sync cables...the parts are JAE. The spec sheets at least have part number references so this will aid in the search. Can't recall where I found these spec sheets, but here they are in .pdf:
https://www.torridheatstudios.com/ftp/share/Documentation/TimeLine/TimeLine%20Microlynx/machine%20interface%20cable/

Danny, I've been reading the Microlynx manual and wow...it just keeps getting better. A real gem of electronic engineering if you ask me. And, yes, I see where your frustration about the technical nature of the writing in the manual comes from...it is not for the average home recordist just getting into synchronization, but it reads WAY better than the manual for the Tascam ES-50/51 which was a frustrating surprise to me when I was trying to learn how to use mine. The Microlynx manual does have a pretty decent way of getting you up and running with the basics, but when you get into the detailed keyboard instructions it gets deep. But the system itself is just cool the way you select machines to a group, select the master...the ability to program macros for common functions...once you get familiar with the keyboard it is actually quite intuitive. The last synchronizer I will ever need for sure. Folks, if you are in the market for a synchronizer to slave your tape deck or multiple tape decks to MTC or you just want to chase-lock machines, seriously consider the Timeline Microlynx...it is IT and they can be had for a relative song. Very well-designed unit.
Danny, if timecode is the master (in other words when viewing the Group the "T" is the first in the group and capitalized), does that include then incoming MTC at the MIDI IN jack and as long as the MIDI IN jack is configured in the system setup to read MTC then the Microlynx will happily chase-lock all connected transports to that MTC as long as the group is setup properly?
I had a chance to test out some of the functions of the Microlynx last night after striping a reel of tape and just the autolocate functions alone make the Microlynx worth the price of admission...the only thing (so far) I couldn't get it to make the BR do properly was to JOG backwards...it'll SHUTTLE forward and backward but it will only JOG forward. The transport acts like it tries to jog back but the transport appears confused. Anyway, just skimming the surface and I'm sure I'll figure out the answer to that one eventually.
Another plus for the BR-20T transport: I am shocked at how quickly it resolves to a new timecode position...the overshoot is so minimal. Way different than my 58 was with the ES-50/51, though I was never able to set the ES-50 to the specific characteristics of the 58 because the ES-50 needs to have two machines connected in order to complete the auto-setup procedure.

Tim, BTW, I meant to comment on your BR-20T vs. ATR60-2T thoughts and yes I think you would be just tickled with either one. The ATR60 likely has a bit more robust transport but the BR may actually be a better *sounding* deck but that is totally subjective and based on other's comments that may or may not be reputable...I think you'll have an easier time finding the BR though.
ALSO...Tim, here are spec sheets on the pins, receptacles and hoods for the Microlynx sync cables...the parts are JAE. The spec sheets at least have part number references so this will aid in the search. Can't recall where I found these spec sheets, but here they are in .pdf:
https://www.torridheatstudios.com/ftp/share/Documentation/TimeLine/TimeLine%20Microlynx/machine%20interface%20cable/