Ampex MM-1000 Story...

  • Thread starter Thread starter sweetbeats
  • Start date Start date
Couple quick updates...

This is cool. You know how I had pretty much resigned myself to the fact that I wasn't going to have the stainless steel covers for the amplifier card bays? My MM-1000 came without them...not too uncommon for the 440/MM-1000 family as they ARE kind of in the way of amp card trimmers and so often operators would take them off and never put them back on...but I DO have a set from the 440-8 I parted out but some of those are pretty beat up and I was going to use a couple of the nicer ones for my 440C halftrack project anyway...so having less than half of them for the MM-1000 in 16-track trim and some of those being kind of trashed and what with the typical asking price for those covers when you can find them I figured "aw it looks pretty cool without them" and that was that...until an acquaintance of mine and fellow MM-1000 owner rediscovered a box of 42 of the things amidst his collection of spares and made me an offer I couldn't refuse that included S&H on 12 of them (I have enough good ones to make the count 16)...he even reglued the cork pads that are on the backside of the covers and polished them up...picked out "the best ones" for me...they all even have the original captive stainless button-head socket cap screws for fastening them to the electronics chassis. And he wrapped each one in pastic wrap, separated each one with a layer of closed-cell foam sheeting...wow. I was just totally impressed. I couldn't resist unwrapping 8 of them and mounting them to the electronics and you know what? They really do look kinda cool, and you know me...I just like having things be "complete" anyway.

Here's the set still wrapped up:

IMG_2893_1_1.JPG


I've never seen so many in this good of shape all at once.

And here they are on the machine:

IMG_2895_2_1.JPG


IMG_2896_3_1.JPG



And I'm still waiting for bearings to arrive so I'm continuing on with dabbling in the 16-track conversion, the ugliest part of which will be installing the the main harness. Have to clean it up and inspect it first so I dug it out of storage and for the next while I'll pick away at scrubbing it up, cleaning all the connector contacts and opening up the Cinch Jones connector hoods and checking the condition of the solder joints and the female sockets.

I really think its a pretty solid assembly, just needs cleaning up, though there are a couple rogue wires I need to trace back and see what they are there for.

Here it is on the floor by the MM-1000 which is where I imagine it'll be for awhile:

IMG_2897_4_1.JPG



Notice, for perspective sake, that the panel at the bottom of the picture is a 2U standard rack-width panel. Some wire there...

Okay, last thing for now is that I know how Ampex crammed another 8 channels of cabling into that head connector housing...looks like later transport plates have a slot cut out for the cables to pass through rather than the hole directly above the reel idler flywheel. Same guy that sold me the cardbay covers was kind enough to send me pics of his machine's innards and in the picture below you can see all those fat wire assemblies dropping straight down from the underside of the transport plate, and you can see the viscous reel idler flywheel toward the right. Well, the hole in my transport plate is right above the flywheel. In fact that flat metal plate is a deflector to keep the wires from dragging on the flywheel, but notice none of my friend's head cables drop down anywhere near that deflector. Why? Because his has a slot that goes most the way across to the lifter linkage hole. This makes it possible for the cables to drop down through the transport plate much closer to the head connectors which means less stuffing of the wires horizontally under the housing...they just go down and through. Funny thing is that I think his is a pretty early model, but mine must be earlier. And no I'm not going to try and drill additional holes in the 5/8" thick heat-treated steel plate.
 

Attachments

  • MM-1000 wiring 008.webp
    MM-1000 wiring 008.webp
    41.7 KB · Views: 100
Last edited:
Okay, last thing for now is that I know how Ampex crammed another 8 channels of cabling into that head connector housing...looks like later transport plates have a slot cut out for the cables to pass through rather than the hole directly above the reel idler flywheel. Same guy that sold me the cardbay covers was kind enough to send me pics of his machine's innards and in the picture below you can see all those fat wire assemblies dropping straight down from the underside of the transport plate, and you can see the viscous reel idler flywheel toward the right. Well, the hole in my transport plate is right above the flywheel. In fact that flat metal plate is a deflector to keep the wires from dragging on the flywheel, but notice none of my friend's head cables drop down anywhere near that deflector. Why? Because his has a slot that goes most the way across to the lifter linkage hole. This makes it possible for the cables to drop down through the transport plate much closer to the head connectors which means less stuffing of the wires horizontally under the housing...they just go down and through. Funny thing is that I think his is a pretty early model, but mine must be earlier. And no I'm not going to try and drill additional holes in the 5/8" thick heat-treated steel plate.

Pretty strange that they weren't like that from the start, since one would assume the Mirasound 24-track was likely one of the first machines. It would be interesting to know how that was setup.
 
Well, Luke, for perspective's sake you ought to consider that the Ampex AV division was more like a custom shop than a industrial production machine. That may sound like a negative and I guess it's all in how you take it, but to clarify that a bit from a subjective standpoint I'm not talking about hacks in a messy shop. Brilliant, brilliant people in a very high standard environment, but what I read is that Ampex audio was often times kind of behind the 8-ball in terms of planning ahead on product development; that they were often reacting to relatively urgent needs or opportunities rather than steering the ship on a well-planned course. In one sense this meant that they were exercised in putting some impressive products together in a relatively short amount of time, and on the other hand it meant that many times they missed the boat on getting it right the first time with certain aspects of products. There were issues of tumult that stemmed from marketing, engineering and production not always being on the same page. These are my subjective insights so don't take this as de-facto information but just my impressionistic overview which has been shaped by statements from people that worked there, people that served in the audio industry during those times as well as more universally accepted historical documents and compilations.

My point is that your rhetorical quandry seems more fitting if we assume that Ampex product development was methodical, but it often wasn't. The MM-1000 is a perfect example. Industry starts murmering "more tracks", Ampex's response at first-blush is "nah", then when the murmerings get louder and there is news of other companies exploring 16-track 2" and Ampex is approached to build a 16" headblock assembly they respond with "ohmigoodness we better jump on this...uh...uh...here! Let's use this here and those there and..." You see what I'm saying?

Now in one sense that would seem to say that the MM-1000 isn't refined or that their development process wasn't refined. Its NOT and it WASN'T! The MM-1000 is wrought with all sorts of "Huh? What th'...why'd they do THAT?!" With the introduction of the MM-1200 Ampex finally got the idea of the MM-1000 "right". Does that make sense? And even at that there were issues with the machine that were worked out through field updates but those were more micro detail issues rather than things like the (figuratively speaking) miles of unsupported tape on the MM-1000 which pose big challenges on minimizing scrape flutter. And the MM-1100/1200 still have quite a bit of it unsupported tape when compared to machines like the 3M M-series machines.

So me having these impressions of Ampex causes me to grin when I read your statement "Pretty strange that [the transport plates didn't have the slot cut for more head cables] from the start, since one would assume the Mirasound 24-track was likely one of the first machines." You're expecting too much. :) They weren't that methodical. The AG-1000 was put out in a hurry, and suddenly Mirasound is using that machine pretty much around the clock for the next 3 years, and hits are coming out and the new rage is 16-tracks and then 24-tracks and studios are buying the MM-1000 in spite of its kludginess.

Remember that the transport plates on the MM-1000 are straight from the VR-1100 quad VTR. There are holes all over those plates that have nothing to do with anything on the MM-1000. With the dress panel off it is a fun little activity for me to look at pics of the VR-1100 and go "oh THAT'S what goes there" and so on and so forth. A suggestion has been made that, because the VR-1100 didn't sell well, was obsolete by the advent of the AG-1000 and that Ampex overran production on the VR-1100 tht they were likely pretty excited to have a place to use the assemblies collecting dust on the shelves. As I believe my MM-1000 is a very early unit the transport plate is VR-1100 breed...it hasn't been significantly modified or manufactured for MM-1000 specific use as later plates may have been as they ran out of VR-1100 stock...even the late MM-1000 machine had holes threaded or otherwise that had nothing to do with the MM-1000. Looks like my friend's MM-1000, even though still an early model benefitted from changes to deal with head cable routing. Mine didn't. It *works* with the 16-track cabling but is tight. My friend's may have been modded by Ampex so that it would work with the 24-track cabling. Mine may have been made before the 24-track option was ready and actually available.

Look at this picture of a VR-1100:

VR-1100.webp


That's the video block under the supply reel and the audio block to the left of the pinch roller. No lifters on the audio block, okay? My head cabling goes through the hole for all the video head stuff which is also where the reel idler roller goes through to the flywheel which also was non-existent on the quad VTR, and my lifter linkage assembly goes through where the audio cabling would go through for the audio block on the quad VTR!

Look at this picture again of that section of my transport plate:

IMG_2870_5_1.JPG



You can see the big hole that my head cabling goes through which would accomodate all the video head cabling and the vacuum line plumbing to curve the tape for the video head on the VTR, and lookit the slotted hole and round hole right where the audio block would be on the VTR which is used to mount the grounding block and to pass the lifter linkage on the MM-1000. Looks like my friend's machine has the slotted hole extended all the way over to the "video cabling/plumbing" hole.

Its all part of the "custom shop" M.O., my friends...

Part of what draws me to the MM-1000 is that work-in-progress aspect. It doesn't get in the way of how the machine sounds, or its reliability and performance. It really is a relatively simple machine but its got mass and audio "balls" that are inseparable from its kludginess. It is part of its character, that "custom shop" aspect, and for me, personally, it is very "American"; the entrepreneurial spirit of my country, and what sometimes blooms when you pit capitalistic pressures with American ingenuity...you often get something wonderful that includes idiosyncrasy. And when that dynamic occurs with a product that is developed to enable an art form, well, that is just something really special. And to widen the scope a bit Ampex really is a very "American" story considering the drama and brilliance if its founding members and chiefly Alexander Poniatoff and their European descent. Its a good story. So there really is a whole mix of attachments to this particular machine for me personally.
 
Last edited:
Oh, and also, notice that the Marasound AG-1000 headblock assembly was placed right over that hole for the video cabling/plumbing...no jockeying of the head cabling...why did they move the block over to the right and bring the reel idler to the right on the MM-1000? I have no idea...have to think about that one...

AmpexDSC00789.jpg
 
Last edited:
My friend's may have been modded by Ampex so that it would work with the 24-track cabling. Mine may have been made before the 24-track option was ready and actually available.

What I was getting at was that I would have *thought* the Mirasound MM-1000-24 would have been one of the first machines off the line, due to the existing history with Mirasound and such. And that any knowledge gained from building that would have been applied to subsequent machines.

Then again, I suppose it is possible Ampex was focusing on getting 16-track machines into studios and a good number of those were produced prior to the 24-track being delivered to Mirasound. Thinking about it, I guess CBS (at least) did go to 16-track in 1968, and perhaps Mirasound didn't go to 24-track until spring or early summer 1969 based on that Edwin Hawkins single. It would be interesting to know the timeline specifics there.
 
According to Dale Manquen (product manager for the MM-1100) in a 2004 posting to the Ampex Mailing List, the first MM-1000 24 track machines had erasure and noise problems caused by the narrow tracks and the long cables to the sidecar unit holding the last 8 channels.

They figured that 24T was not going to be a viable format, and abandoned development. They were subsequently forced to try again once MCI and 3M proved it could be done successfully.

Regards

David Ollard
Thin Brown Line
 
According to Dale Manquen (product manager for the MM-1100) in a 2004 posting to the Ampex Mailing List, the first MM-1000 24 track machines had erasure and noise problems caused by the narrow tracks and the long cables to the sidecar unit holding the last 8 channels.

They figured that 24T was not going to be a viable format, and abandoned development. They were subsequently forced to try again once MCI and 3M proved it could be done successfully.

Was that before or after they delivered one to Mirasound in 1969? When did MCI and 3M release their 24-track machines?
 
3 steps forward and 2 steps back.
Cory, for what it's worth, pretty soon there will be NO steps back. At least..that's what I keep telling myself.


:facepalm::D
 
Is this over the top?

I'd started cleaning up the wiring in the 16-track main harness. I was using a terry towel, toothbrush and window cleaner. Squirt-squirt, scrub-scrub, wipe-wipe, squirt-squirt, wipe-wipe...on to the next little section. I realized that it was going to take forever. I decided, since today was relatively warm and dry, to get a container of mild detergent solution and the same toothbrush setup outside with a hose handy to be able to just dip the toothbrush, scrub-scrub-scrub-dip-scrub-scrub-scrub and then hose off larger sections, doing whatever I could to avoid getting anything in the connector housings which I will still disassemble, inspect and clean later...just trying to get 40 years of scunge off the wiring.

I got most of it cleaned up probably better than the window cleaner method in much less time. The trick is to get it very dry afterward and as quickly as reasonably possible. I've got our dehumidifier, an air circulator and the cadet heater going in the studio...let that go for...awhile.

Is this over the top? I just don't really like mystery dirt and scunge.

In all honesty getting this harness installed is probably the thing I'm MOST intimidated about with the 16-track conversion in terms of getting it cleaned up, pulling the 8-track harness, and getting this one in.

Here's my very scientific/sterile cleaning station. :facepalm:

WP_000000_1_2_1.jpg
 
Last edited:
That's not over the top, it's prudent! You've been so meticulous with cleaning up the rest of the machine, it makes sense to do this too! Lemony fresh sure beats 40 years of storage must and tobacco-y studio stank.

I don't relish having to work with those harnesses. Makes me think of what's lurking under my console's patch bay. I SO hope I don't have to deal with those suckers too much :D


On a side note, I wonder how many zip ties these manufacturers went through in a week :D
 
I don't relish having to work with those harnesses. Makes me think of what's lurking under my console's patch bay. I SO hope I don't have to deal with those suckers too much :D


On a side note, I wonder how many zip ties these manufacturers went through in a week :D

That harness must weigh about 30lbs and sections of it have a mind of their own...hard to manipulate. I'll be glad to be done wth it.

LOTS of zip ties but MOST of the ones that look like black zip ties are string.

Taking apart the power switch panel and this one has the nice later model features with the 110V outlet and the jack for a brake release footswitch and you know what? There's another one of those cool gihugic open-frame relays behind the housing related to the brake release function. Cool. Another thingy that goes *KLACK*. :cool:
 
Man...its...its going to be a bit of a logistical project just figuring out the best procedure for getting the 8-track harness out and the 16-track harness IN...
 
Well I'm not gonna say yet...for one reason I don't know if it is what I hope it is yet, and secondly I really enjoy the funny things you guys come up with trying to guess.
 
A Stephens and a Quad8. In a shed. Free for the taking off Craigslist.
 
You got a retired space shuttle, didn't you Cory? Gonna need a LOT more Deoxit and wood stick swabs for that one...
 
Back
Top