the behringer chronicles....

  • Thread starter Thread starter radiorickm
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
geet73 said:
I understand what you mean, it's just that I didn't take notice to any of it.

Whatever works, works. A Behringer mixer isn't going to ruin a recording.

....or make it sound any better!
 
noisedude said:
*sighs again*

i dunno why i bother.
Some people are just hell-bent on learning the hard way, noisedude.
You can lead a horse to water, but...
...he'll still buy a Behringer mixer.
 
i reckon if yamaha had made their MG mixers silver or charcoal instead of blue there would be no debate on this now, Q. i will say it again, if anyone wants my UB1204 mixer, as new, boxed and still working (you can't include that in saying 'as new') they are welcome to buy if off me. i'd love that last bit of dough to upgrade!
 
Re: Remeber guys, this IS HOMErecording.com.

chessrock said:

. . . And I very politely pointed out to you a better brand right next to it that wasn't past it's date and came from healthy cows and cost exactly the same, what would you do? Thank me?

What mixer are you pointing to that's exactly the same cost as a Behringer mixer? I have the UB2442 Behringer and searched around for months for the best price for the most options; what's the exact same price that offers just as many possibilities? I mean, don't get me wrong; I would love to have an M12, but that's about $500 out of my price range.
 
well you can look at 2nd-hand mackies for a start. there's loads around and they last well, unlike some other brands i seem to discuss a lot ...

here's my example though, www.digital-village.co.uk, which i've only done to settle this argument as far as possible once and for all:

Behringer UB1622FX £146
4 IMP pres, two stereo mixes. Real noisy FX.

Yamaha MG12/4 £126
6 pres, two stereo busses. No FX.

Yamaha MG16/4 £175
10 pres! 2 stereo mixes. No FX.


when you realise you can have a better mic mixer for less than the behringer you start to realise what a false economy they are. for £30 more you HAVE to take the 16/4 and have a PROPER piece of gear.
 
I never said it would make it better. I just said that it won't ruin a recording, unless there's something actually wrong with the mixer.

I understand that they are not the best you can buy.. I was too impatient to find a better deal. I needed a mixer.

I feel I'm arguing about abortion.. heh.
 
I think where the misunderstanding is occuring is this: Some of the people on this board aren't all that serious about recording and some are.

Guys like myself . . . or Michael or Mr Q, etc. etc. like to concern ourselves with making things sound good. Or at least as good as they can possibly be. We like things that have what would be considered to be good sound quality. We're kinda' funny that way -- in almost an obsessive/compulsatory way, we admit.

Where the confusion comes in to play is that guys like us oftentimes assume that everone is just like us. :D When we'd probably just be a lot happier if we realized that some people don't really care if the milk isn't fresh -- they just want something to put in their coffee because they don't like to drink it black.

For those of you who are in this boat, understand that guys like me do not look down on you or put our noses in the air at you. Please understand this. In fact, many of you would be pretty damn cool to hang out with because you're probably a lot more laid back than guys like us who obsess all the time over sound. :D

Now I'm not sure how familiar any of you guys are with the 3 to 1 rule as far as most internet boards work: that's 3 lurkers to every 1 poster. In other words, the vast majority of the people garneshing information from boards like this are not even participating. We're basically just a bunch of fools performing for other people's sheer amuzement. So understand that when I bash a Behringer product, I'm doing it mostly for their benefit. You gotta' figure at least one out of the 3 lurkers is going to be concerned with getting good sound, and avoiding poorly-built and unreliable products . . . so we try to throw them a bone from time to time.

I hope this clears a few things up for you.


Sincerely,

Chess
 
Re: Re: Remeber guys, this IS HOMErecording.com.

88fingers said:
What mixer are you pointing to that's exactly the same cost as a Behringer mixer? I have the UB2442 Behringer and searched around for months for the best price for the most options; what's the exact same price that offers just as many possibilities? I mean, don't get me wrong; I would love to have an M12, but that's about $500 out of my price range.

I can say that I have had a Behringer MX8000 and a Mackie 24/8bus (same as the behringer). I thought the Behringer was a better mixer. Then I got my Allen and Heath 32/4 and saw the light. The same fools that are bashing the behringers are using the Mackies which are a huge pile of shit. At least the behringers are 1/2 the cost (if not 1/3 the cost ) of the Mackies. Mackies are no deal and a used Mackie is even less of a deal. So, it is nice that people bash the Behringers, but if you have a Mackie and think you are above the "behringer" crowd, you would be wrong.

Therefore, I would recommend a Behringer board if you are on a serious budget because Mackies are not better by any means and cost a whole lot more with no step-up in sound. If you can wait and save $$$, then bypass both and look to the Allen & Heath and Souncraft mixers.
 
Re: Re: Re: Remeber guys, this IS HOMErecording.com.

acorec said:
I can say that I have had a Behringer MX8000 and a Mackie 24/8bus. I thought the Behringer was a better mixer.
...
I would recommend a Behringer board because Mackies are not better by any means

i guess you're entitled to your opinions. it's a shame that in this case you're WRONG . never mind.
 
Re: Re: Re: Remeber guys, this IS HOMErecording.com.

acorec said:
The same "fools" that are bashing the behringers are using the Mackies which are a huge pile of shit.

Why do people like YOU consider peeps who "bash" Behringer mixers "FOOLS", "MORONS" ""IDIOTS" etc !!?? What is up with that!!??
I have NEVER, EVER labled homiez who use & swear by Beh products any negative names nor have I, in my almost 4 years here, ever read a post from a so-called "Beh-Basher" where they referred the Beh owner "STOOPID"! There is no need for childish, name-calling when others disagree with you.



At least the behringers are 1/2 the cost (if not 1/3 the cost ) of the Mackies. Mackies are no deal and a used Mackie is even less of a deal. So, it is nice that people bash the Behringers, but if you have a Mackie and think you are above the "behringer" crowd, you would be wrong.

How could you make such a statement!? Sure the Beh is CHEEEP-er, but in a comparison I presented to you a while back showed how the VLZ's rated higher in performance.
1st, the input sensitivity ratings for Mackies Pre's hover somewhere @ +23-25 dbu's while Beh's MX desks rate @ +14-16dbu's which is basically unsuitable when using hi-sensitive mics
in kit-micing applications.
Mackies internal power supplies are robust and in combination with using scaled down resistance values of 3 or 4 with very low impedances, flattens thermal noise to a minimun causing no audible artifacts. Behringer MX's uses large transfomers built close to the thier audio circuit path, which produces excessive amount of heat and noise which most will tell you, adds sound-noise thru the channels, especially audible when gain is increased!
I could go on and on but I'm trying to work on one of my crappy-@ss songs and am wasting too much time trying to convince you.


Yo' acorec, hey man I like and respect you and hope you attend JAMFEST4! There's nuthin' wrong in stating your opinion,but leave out the name callin' bruh!!

Peace!
Q.rM
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Remeber guys, this IS HOMErecording.com.

MISTERQCUE said:
Why do people like YOU consider peeps who "bash" Behringer mixers "FOOLS", "MORONS" ""IDIOTS" etc !!?? What is up with that!!??
I have NEVER, EVER labled homiez who use & swear by Beh products any negative names nor have I, in my almost 4 years here, ever read a post from a so-called "Beh-Basher" where they referred the Beh owner "STOOPID"! There is no need for childish, name-calling when others disagree with you.





How could you make such a statement!? Sure the Beh is CHEEEP-er, but in a comparison I presented to you a while back showed how the VLZ's rated higher in performance.
1st, the input sensitivity ratings for Mackies Pre's hover somewhere @ +23-25 dbu's while Beh's MX desks rate @ +14-16dbu's which is basically unsuitable when using hi-sensitive mics
in kit-micing applications.
Mackies internal power supplies are robust and in combination with using scaled down resistance values of 3 or 4 with very low impedances, flattens thermal noise to a minimun causing no audible artifacts. Behringer MX's uses large transfomers built close to the thier audio circuit path, which produces excessive amount of heat and noise which most will tell you, adds sound-noise thru the channels, especially audible when gain is increased!
I could go on and on but I'm trying to work on one of my crappy-@ss songs and am wasting too much time trying to convince you.


Yo' acorec, hey man I like and respect you and hope you attend JAMFEST4! There's nuthin' wrong in stating your opinion,but leave out the name callin' bruh!!

Peace!
Q.rM


I call the people who have equipment that is more expensive, but continually bash others who CANNOT AFFORD ANYTHING BUT behringer products "fools". You bash Behringer products pretty often and never consider the feelings of the people who CANNOT AFFORD ANYTHIN BUT behringer products. Most people just ask about a product and want to know if it will do the job. The fucking truth is that most behringer equipment will do a fine job. Some won't. But, it is YOU who lump everything they make into the same barrel. This whole newsgroup is just getting way out of hand and there are too many "wanna-be-pros" running around.

So, to answer your statement, when you bash products, peopole who buy those products don't feel too good. Wnen I post about products, good or bad, I post from experience and try not to bash the bad. I just tell the facts. Here is a fact: I had a Blue Tube that blew up within 6 months of ownership. I told peolple about it. Does this mean that all presonus products suck? No. It was MINE that did. If someone wanted to buy one, I would just tell them that there are better pres out there and that would be that.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Remeber guys, this IS HOMErecording.com.

acorec said:
I call the people who have equipment that is more expensive, but continually bash others who CANNOT AFFORD ANYTHING BUT behringer products "fools". You bash Behringer products pretty often and never consider the feelings of the people who CANNOT AFFORD ANYTHIN BUT behringer productS
.


"Consider the feelings of people" !!?? Ooooh , I'm sooooo sorry If I made anybody cry!! That statement has to be the most childish thing I've read in defense of a Behringer product! Come on man,
grow the eff up!!!

And as far as Behringer products are concerned, I own & USE the AutoComm, Composer,a pair of ECM8000's, The Intelligate and the Edison so I DO NOT BASH ALL THINGS BEHRINGER nor do I own ALL TOP OF THE LINE GEAR so PLEASE do yourself a favor and STOP using that excuse.
Dude, I BASH BEHRINGER MIXERS, DSP's and thier Customer dis-Service Dept and that is all I BASH!!!

The bottom line is if you wanna buy a better product then Behringer, JUST SAVE A FEW $$$ MORE; CHECK E-BAY, PAWNSHOPS what-ever-the-f#ck, but take your weak-@ss defense of Behringer mixers to some-1 who doesn't know any better!!!!

[/B][/QUOTE]

Peace
Q.rM
 
I'm done with this thread!

Go on radiorickm and give us your updates on your UB!

Again I apologize to you for destroying your thread! I'm sorry!

Peace
Aaron
 
MISTERQCUE said:
I'm done with this thread!

Go on radiorickm and give us your updates on your UB!

Again I apologize to you for destroying your thread! I'm sorry!

Peace
Aaron

Some behringer users that are less professional than MrQ:
Tom Abraham
FOH Engineer
Garbage, Eve 6, Queensryche

Don Airey
Keyboards
Deep Purple
UK

Kenny Aronoff
Drums
Alice Cooper, Bon Jovi, Joe Cocker, Mick Jagger, Ricky Martin...
USA

Alice Cooper
Recording Artist

John Rabbit Bundrick
Keyboards/Vocals
The Who, Free, Mick Jagger...

Mel Gaynor
Drums/Vocals, Composer/Producer
Joan Armatrading, Elton John, Robert Palmer, Simple Minds, Goldie

Sammy Peralta
Producer / Writer Remixer / Jazz Musician
Gloria Estefan,Janet Jackson,Mariah Carey

SAE
Educational institution for audio, multimedia and digital film

Geoff Whitehorn
Guitar/Vocals
Roger Chapman, Free, The Who

John Volanski
Electrical and audio engineer

Peter Wolf
Composer, Arranger, Producer

I guess these people REALLY have no clue about being "pro"

Maybe you can e-mail them and tell them that they are "stupid" to buy behringer products?
 
YO ......Mr Q!
Sorry you're mad about this......but I've made the same point. When some newbie has already bought a Behringer mixer .........you shouldn't use such nasty insulting terms to describe his purchase. It's just a matter of courtesy. When you tell someone that he's bought a "piece of crap" and that it amazes you how people make such stupid decisions and so on , ..... you're insulting the guy that bought it whether you intend to or not. There are more friendly ways to suggest that he should move to something better when he can.

Now Chessrock makes an excellent point that I hadn't thought of.......that the responses are mainly meant for those still making their buying decisions. I can see that is an important issue and totally justifies pointing out that there are better mixers out there.

I just wish everyone would be a little more considerate of newbies' feelings and not be quite so denigrating about it.
 
Ummmm excuse me radiorickm;


Yo' acorec, you're an @ss-hole and now you are 1 of 2 people on my "IGNORE" list! :mad:

'Nuff said!:mad:





We will now return you back to your regularly scheduled program.
 
MISTERQCUE said:
Ummmm excuse me radiorickm;


Yo' acorec, you're an @ss-hole and now you are 1 of 2 people on my "IGNORE" list! :mad:

'Nuff said!:mad:





We will now return you back to your regularly scheduled program.

You can certainly dish it out but you can't take it. Amazing (not)

BTW, I don't really understand about "ignore list". I thought we were dealing with adults here. Oh well, what can I say?
 
Lt. Bob said:
YO ......Mr Q!
Sorry you're mad about this......but I've made the same point. When some newbie has already bought a Behringer mixer .........you shouldn't use such nasty insulting terms to describe his purchase. It's just a matter of courtesy. When you tell someone that he's bought a "piece of crap" and that it amazes you how people make such stupid decisions and so on , ..... you're insulting the guy that bought it whether you intend to or not. There are more friendly ways to suggest that he should move to something better when he can.

Now Chessrock makes an excellent point that I hadn't thought of.......that the responses are mainly meant for those still making their buying decisions. I can see that is an important issue and totally justifies pointing out that there are better mixers out there.

I just wish everyone would be a little more considerate of newbies' feelings and not be quite so denigrating about it.

Ahhh come on General Bob, you know I could NEVER,EVER argue with you!! That's not fair!!!:(

I was doin' fine until you jumped in!!! ;) ;) :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top