DrewPeterson7
Sage of the Order
...and maybe I dreamed it? Who knows, but it was an observation I remember seeing quickly in passing that stock with me.
Someone (Rob maybe?) mentioned not loving "wide" acoustic micing strategies because an acoustic guitar isn't really a "wide" instrument, so trying to create a single take recording with a very wide stereo spread was kind of like trying to create something that didn't exist in nature, and if you wanted that kind of spread, double track it.
And, maybe I made this up or maybe it was something I really did see around here, but it was something I was just skimming that really stuck with me. I think this is probably a large part of why over the last decade I *have* switched from various stereo strategies to simply recording two tracks with one mic a piece and panning hard L/R. Most "wide" stereo approaches I've tried left me feeling like something was missing the wider the stereo spread got, and while I hadn't really thought much about it I could see using some room mics to create space around a more central guitar and adding stereo spread via distance and depth, even something fairly moderate like one neck joint mic and another mic over the body from ear position felt like there was something missing in the middle when panned hard L/R. Basically, if it's just one guitar, I want "mass" more than width, and the reason for that is as a guy who often sits and plays an acoustic I'm not used to experiencing it on a huge stereo stage.
Idunno. For an interaction I may have totally made up and was a very quicky-skimmed in passing thing if it really happened, it generated some real philosophical musings over why I like what I do like about recording an acoustic guitar.
Someone (Rob maybe?) mentioned not loving "wide" acoustic micing strategies because an acoustic guitar isn't really a "wide" instrument, so trying to create a single take recording with a very wide stereo spread was kind of like trying to create something that didn't exist in nature, and if you wanted that kind of spread, double track it.
And, maybe I made this up or maybe it was something I really did see around here, but it was something I was just skimming that really stuck with me. I think this is probably a large part of why over the last decade I *have* switched from various stereo strategies to simply recording two tracks with one mic a piece and panning hard L/R. Most "wide" stereo approaches I've tried left me feeling like something was missing the wider the stereo spread got, and while I hadn't really thought much about it I could see using some room mics to create space around a more central guitar and adding stereo spread via distance and depth, even something fairly moderate like one neck joint mic and another mic over the body from ear position felt like there was something missing in the middle when panned hard L/R. Basically, if it's just one guitar, I want "mass" more than width, and the reason for that is as a guy who often sits and plays an acoustic I'm not used to experiencing it on a huge stereo stage.
Idunno. For an interaction I may have totally made up and was a very quicky-skimmed in passing thing if it really happened, it generated some real philosophical musings over why I like what I do like about recording an acoustic guitar.
