
grimtraveller
If only for a moment.....
To me, this is one of the wheels on which the entirety of recording history turns. It's partly true that there's probably no need to be so 'Mother Inventive' these days, but this misses the point. Throughout recording history, things have been used in ways not intended by the manufacturer/inventor. The electric guitar/amp/distortion combo that we love so much was a total accident of history. Amps didn't have distortion. They existed so the soft noodlings of jazz guitarists would be heard ~ just. Then players started turning up all the settings and liked the sound and the feedback.Sometimes, not having all the gear you would like makes you use things in ways that the manufacturer never intended. Limited gear is the mother of invention.
Half the reasons mic placements became so important was because engineers were trying to capture sounds that at the time were impossible to get. But by trying to achieve one thing, they found something unexpected. Limited gear led to British studios having to break rules that they had imposed on young musicians because the public picked up on the sounds that these guys were making.
The list goes on.
Furthermore, it's fun trying to make the most with the least. Until it's so limiting that the fun becomes frustration.
Only you can really know if something has become limiting. And if it has......Don't sweat the gear, until it starts to bug you with its limitations. Spend more time researching gear than buying it. Record on.
Again I say it ~ it's paradoxical. Yes, it matters ~ to those to whom it matters. And no, if you are happy with what you have that isn't high end and expensive, then no, it doesn't matter. Personally, I'm not on some endless quest to make 'better' music. I do want to make music that I like and that I'll be listening to in my old age, if I make it to there. My recording and mixing however, does need to get better. Most of the gear I have is pretty low rent but it does what I want it to do. Last summer, I was given a £300 mic, which, for me, is astronomical. I'd never spend that on a mic. On a recorder, yeah, but not a mic. But to many other users here, a £300 mic doesn't even begin to make it as a tambourine mic ! And they're right, there's no reason for them to use what, to them, is a shitty artifact.I'm not sure how clear it was that my question wasn't "does high end gear sound different", which it clearly does but, "does having it matter"?
I still think cheap guitars sound great.
But I'm also right. I like the sound of what it picks up and I can see that it's different {better} than my old Shure Prologues and so I can see the argument both ways. Having said that, it gives me scope and helps me think in terms of "Ok, I'm going to record XYZ....what mike shall I use".