D
dintymoore
Guest
Even hotter than Lillian Munster:
[video=youtube;1TS5tvbYJsc&feature]video[/video]
[video=youtube;1TS5tvbYJsc&feature]video[/video]
Steve Marcus, longtime sax player with Buddy Rich, said that the criteria for whether music sucked or not was if it was mediocre or not.... you can be very bad and still get national recognition,TV interview spots and a record deal with a major label...
Geddy Lee a monotone? You've obviously never actually listened to any Rush tunes. You may not care for his voice but the guy is extremely talented.
Examples of really terrible singers: Bruce Springsteen, Mick Jager, Peter Garrett, David Byrne, Frank Sinatra..... There are just so many that the list would be huge.
The unfortunate truth is that 99.99999999999% of all band singers can't sing fort their life. It would be much easier to make a short list of the ones that actually can sing.
There are so many bands that would be incredible if they just got a good singer. I was thinking this the other day about the original Yardbirds, before they became Zeppelin and snagged arguably the best singer in rock history.
Another unfortunate truth is that non singers somehow think their opinion of what constitutes a good singer actually carries some weight. If someone don't know anything about a subject, it's best to say nothing, doing otherwise just advertises they have no ****ing idea.
Does it take a master carpenter to know if a defective table isn't likely to be sold to the Queen ?Another unfortunate truth is that non singers somehow think their opinion of what constitutes a good singer actually carries some weight. If someone don't know anything about a subject, it's best to say nothing, doing otherwise just advertises they have no ****ing idea.
though. But not the first bit.If someone don't know anything about a subject, it's best to say nothing
Now Jetglo ~ that doctor that you out diagnosed, he's ..... he's a human doctor. Right?
I didn't agree with what that poster said either. I'm a most disageeable chap !Firstly, I was mainly aiming at the poster I quoted who started with the ridiculous statement that only .000000000001% of band singers can sing for their life,
Oh I agree with that in part. Before my Dad died my little brother diagnosed his ailment correctly ~ the Docs again disputed it only to announce three months later what my brother had been telling them. It doesn't make him an expert and that's why I made the quip about me having watched medical dramas. It certainly doesn't mean every layperson's pronouncement is right, neither does it mean experience counts for nothing. Experience should give one the edge........but no one is infalible and that very experience can blind one to things that actually a novice can pick up. The history of recorded music demonstrates that a thousandfold.Finally, I've managed to out diagnose a doctor before too, but this hasn't lead me to offer my opinion up on all things medical since. I'm afraid I subscribe to the view that experience is everything, without it, you should refrain from being critical of those who do what you cannot. I can't stand the "I just know" types who consider actual experience an insignificant detail.
Geddy Lee a monotone? You've obviously never actually listened to any Rush tunes. You may not care for his voice but the guy is extremely talented.
Examples of really terrible singers: Bruce Springsteen, Mick Jager, Peter Garrett, David Byrne, Frank Sinatra..... There are just so many that the list would be huge.