TAE
All you have is now
Kool Aid Kool Aid taste great, wish we had some, can't wait!It depends on the propaganda people would buy into I guess.
Kool Aid Kool Aid taste great, wish we had some, can't wait!It depends on the propaganda people would buy into I guess.
Christian apologetics state that you can come to accept God's existence through reason.I think I know where you’re going with this. In Christian apologetics, it’s a common argument to say that objective morality doesn’t exist unless there’s a god. If that’s where you’re headed, I’m not on board. I think you can have objectivity derived from common agreement, so to speak. (Though I do very much subscribe to the idea that a higher power created the universe and life etc. I believe there is all kinds of evidence for it, but that’s a totally different discussion).
Hope that was clarified by the above.Not sure what this is about.
OK, but I was only referring to consensual / normal acts.
But that also begs the question... If it is no longer seen as disordered to be gay or to practice BDSM, why is pedophilia still illegal?
CuRREnt... issuesSorry, I musta got hypnotized. I blame it on thread drift. What's this thread about anyway?
“Natural law” changes as nature changes, I guess. The age of consent used to be lower. As people started living longer and healthier, as people stayed in school until older ages, the average age of getting married and having children went up as well.Christian apologetics state that you can come to accept God's existence through reason.
That said, I've been quite clear in saying that I will not argue a religious angle to the matter of abortion. Regarding pedophilia and s*xual disorders (which include the LGBTQ+ in my mind) though, there's nothing that makes it objectively wrong apart from the Judeo-Christian tradition, which teaches that it is wrong. All cultures cultures have regarded children as sub-human to an extent until the Judeo-Christian phenomenon, including the pinnacle of ancient civilization -- Rome -- where fathers were totally allowed to reject their children especially once they were born.
I do believe in natural law, which, from my understanding, should make you feel quite guilty if you rape someone. But as far as having s*x with consenting minors...
Hope that was clarified by the above.
brassplyer said:
Nobody can credibly dispute that a zygote/embryo is a living organism. A cluster of cells isn't a person - it has the potential to become a person.
A point I've previously stipulated more than once as in the very quote above is that a zygote/embryo is a living organism. It isn't a person.Is there then no distinction between a living organism and a person? In biological terms, "living" refers to cells able to generate more cells etc. Which definitely makes a zygote/embryo "alive".
brassplyer said:
You're aware that Africans have been slaughtering each other by the trainload - children born only to starve to death or be murdered or themselves become murderers. A while back there was an expose on areas in Africa where people cannibalize children because they think it wards off disease and evil spirits. Kids born into the inner cities where the odds of them being abused, neglected, become involved in criminality, end up in prison are far greater than the odds of them graduating from school functionally literate because they were born to someone who was incapable of birthing them into any other circumstance - they were doomed before they were born. All the horrifically abused kids born to useless parents who had no business having kids in the first place in all the case files you're never going to ever hear about - and all those who never even get reported to authorities. Crack babies, fetal alcohol babies, babies who die in dumpsters or similarly in the Third World and in the First World.
You completely missed the point I was making - if there was any kind of benevolent deity concerned about the welfare of humanity who regarded life as precious circumstances such as I've outlined, Africa among them, *wouldn't* exist. Africa makes a great example because it's been a violent, miserable corrupt shithole for so long but I also pointed out others.That btw is total BS. Instead of exporting abortion clinics to African countries, how about we send them real humanitarian relief? Again, it’s about treating the disease rather than the symptoms. Do you realize that the abortion industry widely propagandizes itself as a genuinely caring organization working for the betterment of mankind? Now I know what people mean when they say they laugh so hard it hurts… You’re just short of saying that women can lovingly kill their babies! I’m disappointed in the New York times’ effect on you, man @brassplyer. You would do good to look into Kamala Harris’ involvement in the prosecution of David Daleiden.
brassplyer said:
It's impossible for the religious to discuss it from a non-religious point of view - you're still driven by and your views are still colored by religious beliefs.
How do you feel about the unborn infant and child killing perpetrated or condoned by God in the Bible? It's okay because he's God?
It's intellectual slackerism to evade like that. We both know your convictions are rooted in religion - part of the problem are the endless contradictions and problems within the Bible that the religious have of course spent just as endless time trying to rationalize rather than say "You know what? This is a crock."What is really lame is that you are the first to mention the Bible despite your persistent claims to be an atheist.
brassplyer said:
Is it correct that you think that first trimester abortion should be illegal?
You're convinced you're entitled to impose your religious beliefs on others - speaking of my previous comment about the historical tendency of the religious to engage in intrusive authoritarianism.Yes.
Women who want abortions.
If murder were made legal, would you actively work for it to be made illegal, or would you just not murder people?
divorce, "birth control" of various sorts, gay behavior, etc.
Yeah I was trying to share and convey a little more about the why's than the who. Hopefully you gleaned that.Women who want abortions.
And this is why God created shame.....shame on you! Smelling dirty q-tips...That's not right!Sometimes I stick Q-tips in my ears, and then I smell them. I don't know why I do that.
What does it smell like?Sometimes I stick Q-tips in my ears, and then I smell them. I don't know why I do that.
Joe and Mika.What does it smell like?
Rising up through your hair?I was going to guess something pleasant like the warm smell of colitas.
Good guess.“Natural law” changes as nature changes, I guess.
This encourages me to venture to say that the way we enforce/interpret natural law has changed.Corporal punishment used to be common, now it’s not. Things we thought were “natural” no longer are.
So it's a living organism with cells and DNA characteristic of a human but what is the term for its kind?A point I've previously stipulated more than once as in the very quote above is that a zygote/embryo is a living organism. It isn't a person.
I don't care about how you perceive my beliefs. Do you actually have thoughts on why we tend to treat the pain rather than the wound:You completely missed the point I was making - if there was any kind of benevolent deity concerned about the welfare of humanity who regarded life as precious circumstances such as I've outlined, Africa among them, *wouldn't* exist. Africa makes a great example because it's been a violent, miserable corrupt shithole for so long but I also pointed out others.
Instead of exporting abortion clinics to African countries, how about we send them real humanitarian relief? Again, it’s about treating the disease rather than the symptoms. Do you realize that the abortion industry widely propagandizes itself as a genuinely caring organization working for the betterment of mankind? Now I know what people mean when they say they laugh so hard it hurts…
A basic fact about the source of my beliefs is that you can reason to the existence of God, more specifically the Christian idea of a God, through non-religious rationality, especially based on scientific truth. Not asking whether you believe that to be true, but would it make sense that we, if we are created by God and live in a world that is the brainchild of God, that His existence would be evidenced by His works?It's intellectual slackerism to evade like that. We both know your convictions are rooted in religion - part of the problem are the endless contradictions and problems within the Bible that the religious have of course spent just as endless time trying to rationalize rather than say "You know what? This is a crock."
No. I find it an abomination of the Human Race that we dare impose our hedonistic beliefs on a vulnerable segment of our race.You're convinced you're entitled to impose your religious beliefs on others
Please refresh my memory.- speaking of my previous comment about the historical tendency of the religious to engage in intrusive authoritarianism.