sweetbeats
Reel deep thoughts...
My 58 was designed to operate with a fluxivity of 250 nanowebers. I thought that was equivalent to a +6 tape, as the 58 was also designed around 456 tape which is a +6 tape right?
Well, the folks at Tascam told me 456 is a +3 tape, and then I saw references that 250 nWb is equivalent to +3.
I decided to let it go as I figured "The deck was setup for 250nWb and 456 tape".
Last night, looking through the latest Full Compass catalog I see RMGI SM911 (a 456 equivalent) listed as a +6 tape...!
I can't let this go. I *think* I know that there isn't a direct relationship between fluxivity and operating level, but there is *some* relationship, right??
I should know this...if somebody tells me "Dude, this topic is worn out...go back and re-read the reference materials a the MRL site!" I'll do it, but no matter what, I gotta get my brain around this.
Well, the folks at Tascam told me 456 is a +3 tape, and then I saw references that 250 nWb is equivalent to +3.
I decided to let it go as I figured "The deck was setup for 250nWb and 456 tape".
Last night, looking through the latest Full Compass catalog I see RMGI SM911 (a 456 equivalent) listed as a +6 tape...!
I can't let this go. I *think* I know that there isn't a direct relationship between fluxivity and operating level, but there is *some* relationship, right??
I should know this...if somebody tells me "Dude, this topic is worn out...go back and re-read the reference materials a the MRL site!" I'll do it, but no matter what, I gotta get my brain around this.