Which software are most studios using?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikerecord
  • Start date Start date
Quote Originally Posted by Murdersgalore View Post
I dunno. I think ProTools sounds ok but Reaper has a better high end sizzle to it. Unless you are using a Mac. Mac's are known to have a hyped low end while PC's are more scooped in the mids. Cubase LE is probably more flat than the rest but it makes it hard for me to play E dorian mode or sweep arpeggios. When are they gonna release Audacity for the Amiga?
Is this for real? Sometimes I miss sarcasm on the internet.

I've used ProTools on PC and Reaper on Mac, and various other combinations over the years, and this is definitely not true. They both take in whatever they are given...if this is for real, it may be the worst piece of information I've ever seen on this forum...if it's sarcasm, I guess it went over my head.
Click to expand...

It is absolutely real.
 
Murdersgalore said:
It is absolutely real.
Click to expand...

Nope, not a joke, he was for real.

Any evidence of this? I mean if I use Reaper on a PC and on a Mac, the Mac will have a hyped high end, and the PC will have scooped mids??? What accounts for this different EQ on different systems? Instead of outboard EQs, I'm just going to get a PC, a Mac, Reaper, Protools, Cubase, and anything else I can find and run my stuff through all of them until the EQ is right!!!

This is all BS for those who may not "get the joke".
 
I miss the good ol' days when manning1 would use any thread to plug Protracks!:D
 
Murdersgalore said:
I dunno. I think ProTools sounds ok but Reaper has a better high end sizzle to it. Unless you are using a Mac. Mac's are known to have a hyped low end while PC's are more scooped in the mids. Cubase LE is probably more flat than the rest but it makes it hard for me to play E dorian mode or sweep arpeggios. When are they gonna release Audacity for the Amiga?
Click to expand...


Church........
 
I didn't think different DAW's SOUNDED different. I thought they were just hosting programs with different features and work-flows. Does one really sound different than the other?
 
RAMI said:
I didn't think different DAW's SOUNDED different. I thought they were just hosting programs with different features and work-flows. Does one really sound different than the other?
Click to expand...

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
 
Mac's are known to have a hyped low end while PC's are more scooped in the mids



could that be more down to the file format that the daw works on rather than the h/w in the pc/mac or operating system.

aiff and wav :confused:
 
RAMI said:
You like that one. :)

It's probably the closest I'll ever get to you covering one of my tunes. :D
Click to expand...

Lol. I do like it. It was hilarious to me when you unleashed those 3 little words. :laughings:

I've been kicking around the idea of covering "Not To Love You" for a long time now. I really like that song. I know it's kind of bubble-gummy, but I think it's my favorite of yours. Real catchy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top