Which 16 channel mixer with high end preamps?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hemmick reef
  • Start date Start date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am looking at 16 channel mixers, and wonder what sort of price/make/model would have top quality preamps and eq?

I want to use the hardware mixer with cubase, rather than mix in the box or use a control surface - I want some analog in the chain somewhere and simply want the hands on approach to recording and mixing (if you know what I mean).

The only problem is paying for a mixer with a bunch of preamps when I only really use one or two at a time, but I will need the eq and channels to mix.

Hope this makes sense


Thanks

I don't really have a lot of experiance with "high end" gear but this post kind of concerns me:confused:

I think of mixer's preamps as being more workhorse preamps for applications that are not critical. In studio applications where a product indeed has to conclude with a very high quality recording, dedicated preamps would have been used to add a particular texture of colour to compliment a source. Kind of like selecting a microphone. So if you are spending lots of money & time trying to find a mixer that will have "high end" preamps I can only see this being a waste of money for the simple fact that the money was not directed to the correct equipment eg dedicated mic preamps. Mixers are selected for their own characteristics, but this is not one of the requirements stated in your post. So in my opinion, when thinking about buying a mixer for a "high end" application connectivity, features, busses, eq section, modular ability, reliability, maintenance... I see these things as much more critical, onboard preamps would be one of the last things that concern me as I would already have those preamps sitting & waiting.

Sorry for not being much help ;)
 
Yeah we've had the one here for quite a while now. Ive only been able to do limited recording thru the pres in my sparse free time. The pres are definately not as sterile as most things you'll find built into interfaces, thats very easy to hear. They have made them more "vintag-ey" sounding for sure. I personally like them better than Onyx pres and I like them better than my Fireface800 pres I'm pretty sure. In fact if it had digital expansion, even a single ADAT port, I would have replaced my own FF800 with one already.

As proficient as I *think* I am, I haven't really been able to nail the compressor like I want. But I have happened upon some good compressor sounds by accident. Once I figured out where all the ins/outs showed up to my non-cubase software I found it to be quite useble in things like Sonar, Reaper, etc as well.
 
Thanks for the review!

Is there any way to control plugins with the knobs of each channel?
That´s what I´m looking for in a DAW control surface...
Not just faders, but a little control about plugins on every channel...
 
Thanks for the review!

Is there any way to control plugins with the knobs of each channel?
That´s what I´m looking for in a DAW control surface...
Not just faders, but a little control about plugins on every channel...

No you can't control plugins from the mixer. It is not a control surface in that sense.
 
Yeah, its control functions are very basic and limited. Pretty much just stop, play and record transport functions. No knobs or faders do anything beyond that.
 
Yeah, its control functions are very basic and limited. Pretty much just stop, play and record transport functions. No knobs or faders do anything beyond that.


Yeah, as far as knobs and stuff on the mixer. There are some nice monitoring features that only work with Cubase. There are some people who have hooked up an external control surface with the n12. That can be found at the gearslutz thread.
 
i would go for a mackie 16x8. they don't make em anymore but there are always some on ebay. the pres are pretty good but probably not as good as the ones on the toft boards but the routing and mixing capabilities on the board are endless. i have a lot of experience with the mackie 24x8 and i really like it. its pretty much the same as the 16x8 expcept with 24 channels. this board is about as low as u can get cost wise without compromising quality so if u have more cash i would go with the new toft boards
 
FWIW, i don't think i've ever heard anything good about the 24*8...that seems to be probably the most-universally panned console out there, behri's aside
 
Thats because the Mackie 8 buss stuff has many known issues including longevity, poor sounding Preamps, even worse EQ, crosstalk etc....
 
ok, before you reply to my comment, have you ever even used that console, I will admit that the preamps aren't very good and the studio that I go to that uses one uses the board as a connection point for some good pres. And the studio has had it for about 5 years so it does last long but thats because they get it fixed up about once a year or two. And I do like the eq on the board and if you don't, the board is so good with routing, you can just patch in a good eq.
and the 8 busses and meter bridges are a great add on that usually don't face problems. The only real problem with this board is that the ribbon cables can shake loose with some really low-frequency stuff.
 
Mackie could have done so much more with their 8 buss consoles...............but they didn't.

Soundcraft came close with the Spirit Studio range, quite acceptable preamps, musical EQ, better "stamina" within the bussing capabilities, better design, etc., etc and then they showed how it could be done with the introduction of the Ghost.

:cool:
 
ok, before you reply to my comment, have you ever even used that console, I will admit that the preamps aren't very good and the studio that I go to that uses one uses the board as a connection point for some good pres. And the studio has had it for about 5 years so it does last long but thats because they get it fixed up about once a year or two. And I do like the eq on the board and if you don't, the board is so good with routing, you can just patch in a good eq.
and the 8 busses and meter bridges are a great add on that usually don't face problems. The only real problem with this board is that the ribbon cables can shake loose with some really low-frequency stuff.

Actually, yes. I have both seen and used Mackie 8 buss consoles MANY more times then I would like to have, and I stand by my statements. In fact, we have even owned some. Thankfully those are almost all gone now. What good are having 8 busses if they slur the sound and are also victim to crosstalk? The direct outs are a little more resistent to the crosstalk, but whats the point in having a console at all if any time you want to do something you have to patch in a preamp and an EQ? I also would not talk about a consoles longevity if it has to be "fixed up" every year or two. At least not such a small limited console. I have had plenty of Allen Heaths that bounced in and out of trucks several times a week, in and out of smoky bars and clubs several times a week, and just plain been abused that lasted for 5 years or more without needing repair work at all. Personally, the EQ on a Mackie VLZ series console is about as shitty as it gets. 8 busses is not all that rare either, nor necessary at all in a home recording setup where things are typically tracked form direct outs anyhow and mixes are done in a DAW application. Even in live use 8 busses is certainly not a necessity when only mixing 8 or 16 channels. So the Mackie meters might be ok, but what are all these routing features that the Mackie offers that makes it so different form a dozen other consoles on the market in a similar price range? I think the one thing the Mackie consoles did have going for them was the price point that they entered the market at WHEN THEY FIRST CAME OUT. Now a console like that is a dime a dozen and often times even cheaper. At the time they came out however, options were certainly more limited so they did serve a good purpose. Since then however Mackie has been very slow to release any sort of new product or change with any sort of real impact with the exception maybe of their studio monitor line, but other companies were hot on the heels of that one two.

I completely understand people having bought Mackies in certian scenarios and budgets, but options are now (and have been for a while) available so the "budget" excuse is no longer as valid. Plus, this thread was about "16 channel mixers with high end preamps". In my opinion, Mackie should have never come up in this discussion. Granted the Onyx stuff sounds MUCH better in many ways (preamp, EQ, noise, usability, longevity so far etc...) but I would still not consider it to be high end preamps.

If I were to have to answer this question today, the Toft would be the closest starting point, but still not very highly regarded as having high end preamps, although its EQ may more than make up for that. A Midas venice would also be a good starting point. After that you would probably have to make the jump to Neotek, API, Neve, DaKing, Chandler, certain vintage Trident consoles etc.... all of which do have preamps and a overall sonic quality which is pretty widely considered to be "high end" even when compared to other great sounding outboard preamps. This all comes at a price though, but it also maintians its value which nowadays may be more important then ever to consider.
 
Back
Top