bbs. Sounds like it would have been way cool. Isn't that something like the units that a couple of manufacturers like JL Cooper make? I thought I saw something like that if I understand
Yes, except I had a knob, fader, switch as if it was a neve input channel. This way analog guys like myself can enjoy digital, without having to use a mouse, keyboard, etc. was a neat idea, didn't pan out as well as I'd have liked.
Did you EVER get Tascam to listen to you 'bout
that programming issue. Since their bbs is gone? haven't been
Tascam promised me the "Moxa" protocol - the data stream that
the TM-D4000 series mixers communicate with a PC, for full system automation. They had software, but it didnt support surround mode where as the mixers did, so it was useless in that regard. Also, for every mixer you have (you can cascade up to four, to operate as one unit), you need a seperate PC and another copy of the software. Thats about as counter-intuitive as it gets, and surely a waste of PC's.
Also, their software didn't like to coexist with other software, like sonar XL for example... strange lockups and other odd problems.
They made a good attempt, what I wanted to do was take their idea, and expand it to what it should be, then give it away to whoever wants it. The mixers were discontinued, the software is no longer updated by tascam, I saw no harm in taking what should have been an awesome product, and making it awesomer if thats a word.
The DM24 came out so Tascam *I think* didn't want the old hardware to be deemed useful. However, after investing a lot of time, research effort, and paying a programmer friend of mine to shell out the entire application, they never gave me the Moxa protocol and by that time I was so frustrated I dumped the project, and decided I will not be purchasing any new Tascam products in the future. Used stuff yes, but I won't be giving their corporate entity any of my money. After putting my money ($11K)where my mouth was and to end up with nothing, I'm through with them.
Had they given me the protocol specs, I could have had 4 mixers cascaded together, running on one PC, full automation, in surround mode, as if it was one, giant 128 channel console. whats not to love about that? I also had it developed for Mac, PC and Linux, so no one is shut out. Oh well, another lesson learned. There was one cool guy there (Jace) who eventually left and went to Line6, he was really trying to help me out, however corporate didn't really do what they said they'd have done.
So instead, I spent a tremendous amount of time working through midi-automation of the TM-D1000's that I have (eight in all), which works fine. I have all eight mixers independantly controlled and I've sold all but one 4000. I only needed stereo buss anyway, so the smaller units give me more channel space per foot than the bigger mixers. Plus, the smaller units are available on skank-bay, one dies, buy another for $300 and call it a day. The TM
D4000, while built very well, has some quirks because they dumped the product before it could be finished.
corporate was getting their digital ass kicked on the DM-24 thing, but I'm no digital guy. I just know there were some pissed people posting their "digital woe is me" stuff and giving
Sonically, the DM24 is awesome. I was very impressed with it and seriously considered purchasing four to replace the TM-D4000's, then I decided 'what the hell am I thinking?' No thank you. If I ever purchase "real" consoles the DM24 is not on the list... I'd spend the money to acquire the new O2R's or two DMX's. Someday when I have more money. Right now a row of TM-D1000's do the job just dandy.