Liberace and Elton John seem kind of gay to me. Hasn't stopped them from selling a few, though, huh?seeming kind of gay is not a musical criticism ..........
Absolutely a complete and total non-factor in whether music is good or not.
Liberace and Elton John seem kind of gay to me. Hasn't stopped them from selling a few, though, huh?
Opeth. No contest.
Enjoy, and you're welcome.
Opeth - Harvest
youtube.com/watch?v=EqWdCRYEZGE
Opeth - Atonement
youtube.com/watch?v=KeKUsdSD4fk
Many did, both during the 60s and beyond.Screw the Beatles http://www.rogerjosephmanningjr.com/projects/jellyfish/
I think it's because I'm an Australian that I can't take AC/DC seriously.
They were, to the minds of my generation at least, and largely as a result of seeing them on pop music television programs, a pop band. They did a rockin' good take on pop but that's what they were - along with Slade, T Rex and such like.
BCC's 1st & 2nd albums are terrrrrrific but I haven't decided about the 3rd yet.
Deep Purple did some good stuff but their lyrics were purple without being deep.
Sabs - the classic albums up to & including Sabotage are simply classic. 13? I bought it but I think it draws on too much from the 1st 3.
Beatles? I have the LPs. I have the mono mixes but, in the endthey're not a band I play often. Once or twice a decade to be honest.
I find it funny that anyone ever likes or dismisses a band based on their 'category' such as "I don't like them .... they're a pop band"
What in the hell does what people call a band have to do with the music?
Answer ..... nothing.
I hear what you're saying but it doesn't compute for me ....
I totally get it. If someone says to me, "Hey Greg, check out this tejano rap group". I'll be like, "go fuck yourself" because I know there's no way I'm gonna like it.
well yeah .... but that's a pretty specific description.
But things like 'pop' or 'rock and roll' are so general and vague they're almost meaningless.