He's not the only one who got that impression. See above. It's easy to see how anyone could get that idea.
Ok.....what if we let more die now and the economic downturn is not as bad as you predict? I 100% believe that any hard economic downturn can and likely will cost lives....as you say. How many is up for debate. That hasn't happened yet.......and maybe never will. What if it doesn't?
But surely.......actually purposely allowing more to die....if it comes to that....in this pandemic......purposely....as a matter of policy decision has to be saying that it's ok.
I really don't think you think that......but you have to be able to see why someone might think you do.
I'm not sure how you come to the conclusion that we would be "purposely" allowing more to die. You're just making an assumption...but then so are all the experts.
So what exactly are you suggesting...?
1.) It's unlikely that the economic crash would happen or that it would be that dramatic...so let's just all stay home and focus on the virus.
2.) Let's not even think about the possible economic crash and the 10x more lives it will destroy...let's just focus on the virus, and we'll worry about that disaster when it comes later on.
See...some of you are saying what's my "plan"...but I would like to know WTF is the long-term plan for everyone in this country, and not just the immediate focus on easing up the hospital overcrowding.
My buddy in CA had to go into the hospital on Monday for an intestinal issue...something totally unrelated to the virus. He was still there last night, hoping to go home today...and I asked him on the phone how was it in that hospital.
He said they had one section quarantined off for the COVID-19 patients...but the rest of the hospital was taking care of other health issues. The only concern was that all the staff would at some point rotate through the quarantined ward. He said they didn't test him, just asked if he had been feeling any symptoms of the virus, to which he said no...and they said when he goes out into the halls, he needs to wear a mask, otherwise, it's business as usual in the hospital for many patients like him.
So when we just focus on the hot spots like NYC, Chicago, now New Orleans...it paints a picture that fuels the fear and panic...but many places are not experiencing that kind of virus overload, and most people just feel ill, and then they get better.
For the last week or so...the US mortality rate has held between 2%-2.5%...with most of that happening in the hot spots where the shut downs are in effect.
So they are not having any significant effect on the numbers.
The USA has 330 million people of which 270 thousand are infected, but that doesn't mean sick and dying and needing ventilators...which is how things are being interpreted by the people living in fear.
Basically that's 0.08% of the USA population infected...which means 99.02% are not.
I'm just saying that there has to be some middle ground where we take care of the sick, and have the high-risk people stay at home and also let the healthy folks exercise caution guidelines and allow them to maintain some sense of normalcy for the benefit of everyone, for the long-term.
Nowhere in that is it suggested that we just "let people die". I'm saying that we may lose a lot more in the long-term if our perspective is too myopic.