Mixdown EQ: NAB or IEC?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lo.fi.love
  • Start date Start date
lo.fi.love

lo.fi.love

Functionally obsessed.
I'm going to realign my mixdown deck for a different operating level. It's set up for NAB equalization right now and I'm interested in changing it to IEC EQ for a couple of reasons.

The question is, is 15ips w/ IEC EQ a common enough format among the mastering studios which accept 1/4" tape? For some reason I thought that 15ips NAB was more typical, but I don't know where I got that.

Thanks!!
 
Any professional mastering facility in possession of pro level analog 1/2 track stereo deuces and the trained engineers to run them will be able to quickly recalibrate to accommodate either set up. NAB may be more well known because it is an older standard that goes back to the era when noise reduction was not in use, but I don''t know if that makes it more "typical" or relevant.

Cheers! :)
 
In my experience (admittedly in the UK, not the USA) CCIR/IEC equalisation is more common than NAB at 15ips. However, as The Ghost of FM says, any decent facility should be able to recalibrate in moments--I'd be worried about a place that couldn't. I used to even have a simple passive circuit I could put into the output of a tape machine that could do a conversion. Ah, memories!
 
I could have the wrong impression, but I somewhere got the idea that IEC was a flatter sound, like digital. Not that one is better than the other but for mix down it seems to make sense to mix down to IEC. But in my tracking experience, I've liked the sound of my NAB decks better.
 
Any professional mastering facility in possession of pro level analog 1/2 track stereo deuces and the trained engineers to run them will be able to quickly recalibrate to accommodate either set up. NAB may be more well known because it is an older standard that goes back to the era when noise reduction was not in use, but I don''t know if that makes it more "typical" or relevant.

Cheers! :)


Mastering clients should provide tones for proper alignment for their tapes, regardless of set-up eq on their own machines.
 
Regardless of any perceived pros and cons comparing the two standards, in real world terms NAB is the North American standard and IEC is the European standard equalization for half-track mastering decks.

IEC tape played back on a NAB machine is going to sound all wrong and visa versa. NAB is the most common in the United States, Canada and Japan by far. New half-track Machines destined for the US were factory set for NAB EQ unless requested otherwise. Most US and Canada studios use/used NAB EQ.

While most mastering facilities that still accept tape should be able to accommodate either standard, some may not and there are other things to consider. If you want to playback other people’s tapes or your own older tapes you’re out of luck, unless your deck has a simple switch to change EQ. Most decks require changing internal jumpers, switches or adding internal components… resistors, caps etc, and recalibration after the change. Even some Otari Machines, which have an external NAB/IEC switch need internal tweaking for the repro side of things.

IMO there are no compelling reasons to use IEC on a half-track unless you live in the UK, Europe or Australia. It’s all about standards for the region you live in. Before the Internet you just didn’t see debates over these EQ curves. It was never about which was better. They aren’t competing standards, but simply and accidentally different EQ curves that were adopted as standards over time in their regions of origin.
 
Also, don't NAB machines have marginally narrower tracks?
 
I could have the wrong impression, but I somewhere got the idea that IEC was a flatter sound, like digital. Not that one is better than the other but for mix down it seems to make sense to mix down to IEC. But in my tracking experience, I've liked the sound of my NAB decks better.

In my experience, and on my Otari MX5050 2-track, NAB equalization boosts around 60-140 Hz and kind of tapers off some of the high frequency response.

My Otari has a switch on the rear to toggle between NAB and IEC, and just to see what would happen, I tried IEC. Granted my tech set up the deck for NAB, but when I recorded something with IEC eq and played it back, the bass seemed more 'correct' and there was slightly more detail in the higher frequencies.

Thanks for your input everyone!
 
Also, don't NAB machines have marginally narrower tracks?

don't confuse format with eq. Maybe you're thinking about the NAB standard halftrack standard vs. The European DIN standard which, yes, has slightly thicker head cores and thinner guard bands than the NAB standard, but this has nothing to do with eq. There are NAB standards about all sorts of things tape machine related and otherwise.
 
Back
Top