Lets talk Stereo recording

Oh, I see. Sorry, misunderstood. (y)

"That's not without it's problems as, then, you lose the natural left/right bleed that the pianist would have heard."
Although I'm just realising this isn't as much of an issue because the microphones picked that up already.

Then yeah, I guess recording at ear position and playing back on headphones should be pretty convincing.
 
Oh, I see. Sorry, misunderstood. (y)

"That's not without it's problems as, then, you lose the natural left/right bleed that the pianist would have heard."
Although I'm just realising this isn't as much of an issue because the microphones picked that up already.

Then yeah, I guess recording at ear position and playing back on headphones should be pretty convincing.
Don't forget to put the mannequin head between the mics to get your true binaural recordings!


1789830449834.webp
 
Doesn't really make much difference.
There stereo image is still totally different to what you'd hear from speakers.
If the stereo image is what we hear - which I agree with - that gets the point I'm making - is tracking in stereo a thing - or a result of the speakers? I know you can record stereo - but then you hear the playback and that's stereo - but if you record two mono signals to tracks - using the piano as an example - then is it stereo? The Playback would say it is because you are hearing the sound spread across the field between the two speakers - right?
 
In my view, yes. You're using two separate channels to record different left/right information so yes, stereo.
 
Not really what I said. What's the point of this?
Feels like it's heading towards a pointless gotcha.

I mean, if you capture with some kind of left+right setup, and playback with some kind of left + right setup then it's stereo?

The word pretty much always needs qualification anyway.
A stereo effect, a realistic stereo capture, a stereo mix? They're all different things.
The common point is that left and right are not the same.
 
Back
Top