Lt. Bob said:
You can fail to understand or twist things around to fit your beliefs as you wish.
It's not a mischaracterization, or perhaps I wasn't clear.
You've said sarcastically in the past, maybe in this thread, "way to prejudge". I take it you're not fond of prejudgments? Someone prejudged Jimi would somehow cause a disruption, or whatever second hand nonsense was given as the reason for the
preemptive ban. Can we agree, then, prejudgment is a misguided intention, screwed up, or in the least worthy of a wee expression of sarcasm? Way to prejudge
, yeah?
You complained that Greg had been on good behavior, and it was ridiculous that he was banned just because some HRs had him in their sights no matter what. Jimi has been on good behavior, not only in the Tone Thread. He went to RR to participate in the Tone Thread just as he had here. We all know how that went, "one or more" members
had him in their sights no matter what and decided he should be excluded. Surely you would agree that is also ridiculous? Good behavior should get equal consideration, yeah?
One more thing you could address, if you would. Not to pick on you, i'm just asking your opinion. If as I suspect Jimi wasn't allowed in as a result of past political discussions here, and assuming RR has a no politics rule, would you agree that by banning Jimi it is breaking that rule in that the ban is essentially politically motivated? I hope i'm wording that correctly. To put it more simply, "That guy can't come here because this is a no politics zone, and i've never cared for his political views".-->?
Given a little unbiased thought, a lot of it just doesn't make sense, unless we're looking for examples of hypocrisy and self righteousness.