RawDepth said:
Too many people just settle for whatever sound they happen to get on the first take and then spend hours trying to change it. ...And then later wonder why the final mix didn't come out that good. Then they log on here and ask what EQ setting or compression setting will fix it all.
If you want great sound you've got to earn it, starting from the start...the room, the instruments, the mics.
RawDepth
R,
You nailed it. This applies to all recorded tracks.
This has been a point of frustration for me over the years.
Back in the day when all I had was tape, people worked their butts off to get good performances. You ocassionally spent time punching in fixes here and there.
Now since you have the ability to mangle, move, edit, tune... WHATEVER, people are getting lazy. Not the recordist necessarily,for now he has to spend the hours in editing and mixing that should have been spent in experimenting with placement and working up performances.
It NEVER sounds as good. I can create a Frankenstein track in perfect time / tune that never sounds as good as a good performance with the right mic.
It is the expectations and work ethic of the new breed of folks being recorded. When I try to force the issue of retakes and coached performances, many think it a ploy to rack up the hours... thats when I wish they had their own good producer... but many producers now days know a little about computer based edits, and think they are doing their band a favor by telling you...good enough! fix it later.
You know... just because you CAN do something does not mean you always WANT to. I have the ability to take out my own appendix but I dont want too...
Well enough ranting...
Tom