
rob aylestone
Moderator
The thing that really annoys me is when they harvest the net for their data but never think to return with the conclusions. Its rubbish research for a poorly designed degree.
When people do it properly, you get loads of university paperwork, telling you who is monitoring and controlling. They give you university research rules and warn you of your entitlement to withdraw at any time. The entire thing is different. I am not sure how it is in the US, but here, unis often have to spend much of the first year improving students research skills, and their forumative work before they can produce conclusions. I wonder if the ones we get are set designed to reveal the flaws, and uncover the bad research techniques. They smugly submit them and get them ripped to shreds. I really do suspect this is behind the daft ones. In my day, a supervisor said NO to most things that passed their desks.
When people do it properly, you get loads of university paperwork, telling you who is monitoring and controlling. They give you university research rules and warn you of your entitlement to withdraw at any time. The entire thing is different. I am not sure how it is in the US, but here, unis often have to spend much of the first year improving students research skills, and their forumative work before they can produce conclusions. I wonder if the ones we get are set designed to reveal the flaws, and uncover the bad research techniques. They smugly submit them and get them ripped to shreds. I really do suspect this is behind the daft ones. In my day, a supervisor said NO to most things that passed their desks.