Dampening . . .

  • Thread starter Thread starter chessrock
  • Start date Start date
Say, Harvey -

Its great to see you posting here again, you've been missed.

re: mucking about in head grilles -

Audio analysis technology is much more affordable than back when I worked in a lab with expensive MLSSA spectral analysis software and / or a dedicated $15K HP analyzer.

Now, a DIY'er can run spectral analysis on a mic, or capsule grille with the entry-level version of Cool Edit and a Panasonic electret capsule.

But here I'll agree with Marik and Flatpicker, there are some mods - those that have to due with transient response - that are across-the-board improvements and give better results with any signal source.

This idea of transient accuracy was the driving impulse (ha, a pun) behind David Blackmer's work leading to his Earthworks mics and preamps. (I worked for Dave for 14 years prior to Earthworks). I tried to get him interested in designing a new large diaphragm mic back in 1991 or so, but he wanted to hear accuracy and imaging on instrumental pick-up that only a small diaphragm feeding a fast transient response preamp could deliver. His goal was to capture, as accuratly as possible, at a new lower price point, rapid impulse sound over as wide a bandwith as possible with no phase shifts.

Does this sound good? Sure does with instruments, a bit clinical on close vocals perhaps.

The happy medium for me, is a still a big 'ol 25mm or 33mm capsule in a large, single mesh grille driving a fast response head amp.

What the proliferation of low-cost LDC means to me is DIYers have more affordable materials to work with and learn from!
 
Wouldn't putting a foam filter on that mic dampen it? I know the foam filter will cut some of the highs, but it should dampen it also... no?
 
Back
Top