Windows 7 is great for recording. Your information there is, sad to say, incorrect.
And fine, I understand the PC dilemma. However, I ran my studio for five years on a relatively modest Core 2 Duo machine (which I still use at home and works great). Even a Pentium 4 will have more power than a small Tascam Portastudio.
If you're sharing with your wife, however, that's a different thing altogether. That's limited access and I can understand the problem.
And USB stuff? You mean the interface? It's probably cheaper than your portastudio. A Focusrite 2i2 is like $150.
And on 24-bit being deemed ancient...
That's not likely in the near future, I'm afraid. Until PCM audio gets replaced altogether with something better, 24-bit is here to stay. Keep in mind the THEORETICAL dynamic range of 24-bit audio is 144dB. We are YET to produce gear that has thermal noise beyond 120dB and that is the biggest hurdle for inventing audio interfaces with higher bit precision. Additionally, if we don't need more headroom, why bother with new formats and bit depths? 120dB is more than enough for even the quietest music. Ever heard of DSD (Direct Stream Digital)? It's a "superior" format that works on sample rates like 5 GIGAHertz and has a bit depth of 1-bit (yup, you read right, 1-bit). Apparently it sounds great, but it FAILED. Why? It can't be edited easily. There are still some studios that are able to record in DSD but for the most part, 24-bit audio is still king.
And it's not about buying new gear for the sake of progress. It's about making your life easier and being able to record something without hassle. If you're happy with the workflow of a portastudio, then by all means. It's just that personally, I could never go through the hassle of bouncing from device to device just to accomplish a simple recording. It would render me uninspired.
Reel to reel tape is a different thing altogether. People record on tape for its sound and it's still an accepted and often coveted way of recording. You said it yourself. Your friend gets better recordings on it and that's the trump card. Hell, if I could record on tape these days, I would. And yes, people use what they know and I understand that fully.
And regarding recording getting in the way...yes...that is my exact point. My personal preference is to minimize the hassle of recording as much as possible and that's what prompted me initiating this discussion.
grimtraveller said:
Yeah. It's called preference and choice.
I may be astounded that lots of people in the world prefer to cook on an open fire or use a parafin stove. But they do, they're happy to do so and it's not for me to impose my ideas of ease and convenience on them because it's not what I would choose to do.
The word 'better' is subjective and as such, inherently emotive.....
Relax bro. Don't get your knickers in a knot over this. I'm not trying to slate anyone. I'm just sayin'...it's a little odd to record on a portastudio when,
in my opinion, it's so much less of a hassle to do it on a computer.
Cheers