Why Do Boutique Preamps Cost So Much?

I am sorry Smithers but you have promulgated a few common myths and misnomers there.

There is no such thing as "RMS" watts. We measure electrical power as the product of an RMS VOLTAGE and an RMS CURRENT. The result is watts, pure and simple. Pedantry? Sure but I expect companies writing specifications to be electrically educated.

It is also a gross oversimplification to say transistors go into ***t or bust distortion and valves don't. The overload characteristics of any power amplifier depends upon how much or if any negative feedback is used. Because of the way transistor PAs are now made* they have to have a lot of NFB. Valve guitar amps have very little or even none (AC30 e.g.)

NFB keeps distortion low until a certain 'break point' then WHAMMO it shoots up. Such an amplifier would be of little use to a guitarist. However, hi fi VALVE amplifiers have this sudden rush of distortion much the same as solid state.

Valve amps ARE louder watt for published watt but not I would say in that 5 to 1 ratio. It is hard to specify since both amp types are so variable in design but 2 or 3 to 1 would be my bet. The higher volume of valves comes about mainly because they have a much higher output resistance than most SSTate amps. Typically for a 30W valve amp with no NFB Z out will be around 50 Ohms. Now, speaker voice coils get hot and thus their resistance increases. This is called "Thermal Compression" and if such a speaker is fed from a very low source resistance, i.e. a sstate amp, the current in the VC will fall and so therefore the input power. A valve stage will keep pumping in the current and thus keep the volume up.

*Not always the case. The venerable Quad 50E was essentially a transistor version of a valve circuit and you could I think remove or reduce the NFB and get a more gradual overload characteristic. LOVE to get my hands on one!

Dave.
 
I am sorry Smithers but you have promulgated a few common myths and misnomers there.

There is no such thing as "RMS" watts. We measure electrical power as the product of an RMS VOLTAGE and an RMS CURRENT. The result is watts, pure and simple. Pedantry? Sure but I expect companies writing specifications to be electrically educated.

It is also a gross oversimplification to say transistors go into ***t or bust distortion and valves don't. The overload characteristics of any power amplifier depends upon how much or if any negative feedback is used. Because of the way transistor PAs are now made* they have to have a lot of NFB. Valve guitar amps have very little or even none (AC30 e.g.)

NFB keeps distortion low until a certain 'break point' then WHAMMO it shoots up. Such an amplifier would be of little use to a guitarist. However, hi fi VALVE amplifiers have this sudden rush of distortion much the same as solid state.

Valve amps ARE louder watt for published watt but not I would say in that 5 to 1 ratio. It is hard to specify since both amp types are so variable in design but 2 or 3 to 1 would be my bet. The higher volume of valves comes about mainly because they have a much higher output resistance than most SSTate amps. Typically for a 30W valve amp with no NFB Z out will be around 50 Ohms. Now, speaker voice coils get hot and thus their resistance increases. This is called "Thermal Compression" and if such a speaker is fed from a very low source resistance, i.e. a sstate amp, the current in the VC will fall and so therefore the input power. A valve stage will keep pumping in the current and thus keep the volume up.

*Not always the case. The venerable Quad 50E was essentially a transistor version of a valve circuit and you could I think remove or reduce the NFB and get a more gradual overload characteristic. LOVE to get my hands on one!

Dave.
My first guitar amp was a 70s Carlsbro Scorpion 2x12 all solid state combo. That amp was very loud, had twin channel and sounded bloody great overdriven, so yes, you are right, apologies. I forgot about that one Dave 😉👍
 

Attachments

  • lhbu6jg77o3sq7w18xta.jpg
    lhbu6jg77o3sq7w18xta.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 2
The ART MPAII is a much respected amp, despite its modest price. It is on my shopping list.
Ive had a couple of these MPA and even the rare "blue" Art MPA used in the SOS article. Well designed unit , great reviews and cosmetically well done.

When I had the Art MPA or UA 610 Preamp ran in clean mode I never heard a difference. And so the two channels, cheaper price, and SOS article confirmation is attractive for the MPA. Ive had repair issues with MPA VU meter but Ive had bad pots on a Limited Edition LA610 too.

I always thought a MPA/VLA setup would be great. If I could time travel Id grab them for $100 each used. Now its $500 a pair used?

For me if I had to choose my fav over all the preamps Id go ISA One.
 
Audio transformers cost money.
From what I read, it seems transformer use is desirable, because they can be overdriven, whereas driver circuits can't.
 
Audio transformers cost money.
From what I read, it seems transformer use is desirable, because they can be overdriven, whereas driver circuits can't.
This is a common claim but in the case of input transformers I think the idea is more in the mind of the user than electrical fact?
A mic pre amp maker might claim an overall distortion figure of say 0.02% (that is not really that good) at say +4dBu output. I cannot see therefore that the input transformer can be delivering any audible effect to the signal? In any case, even quite a poor quality mic traff would handle way more signal than most mics could put out and you would not expect the likes of Neve et al to USE poor quality transformers!

Yes, there are pre amp and compressor designs that deliberately arrange the capability to drive an OUTput transformer into distortion but that is rather a special case?

I am pretty sure the guys at Maida Vale and Nashville used THE best transformers they could lay their hands on!

Dave.
 
Back
Top