
johneeeveee
New member
more specifically...
... i, too, think it would be more informative to see what acoustic guitar sizes (dreadnought, om, oo, ooo, jumbo, etc), and woods (spruce, mahogany, maple) folks are getting certain results with when recording. brand name is kinda secondary to me, personally.
i tend to like smaller bodied guitars for recording... more even tones from top to bottom to my ear (i don't like the "woof" of dreadnoughts. my personal favorites are a collings om sized guitar (spruce top, brazilian rosewood), and a much less expensive, all mahogany martin 00-15 that practically records itself. of the bigger guitars i do dig the round shouldered gibsons, but i don't own one... yet
as stated by others, i agree that the player is a HUGE part of it. i know some guys who can make total crap ring like a bell.
peace - jv
... i, too, think it would be more informative to see what acoustic guitar sizes (dreadnought, om, oo, ooo, jumbo, etc), and woods (spruce, mahogany, maple) folks are getting certain results with when recording. brand name is kinda secondary to me, personally.
i tend to like smaller bodied guitars for recording... more even tones from top to bottom to my ear (i don't like the "woof" of dreadnoughts. my personal favorites are a collings om sized guitar (spruce top, brazilian rosewood), and a much less expensive, all mahogany martin 00-15 that practically records itself. of the bigger guitars i do dig the round shouldered gibsons, but i don't own one... yet

as stated by others, i agree that the player is a HUGE part of it. i know some guys who can make total crap ring like a bell.
peace - jv