use a A/D converter instead of the A/D of your digital recorder ??- Pls advise

  • Thread starter Thread starter Papoola
  • Start date Start date
P

Papoola

New member
Hello, do you get significant audio improvement when plugging a digital signal directly into your multitrack recorder (Korg D 16) avoiding using the A/D converter of the multirtrack ??
I can understand that the 386 has more sweety and No-clipping harsh signals compared to my digital gear, but does this sound logic ??

Both equipment are 24 bit, so mainly it will be the quality of the converters. The dbx 386 cost 50% of my korg D 16 so it is supoosed to do his job more accurately, isn't ???
Dbx 386 has Digital out and i will supply with it my korg recording operations.
Do you approve ???
 
The converters, not to mention the mic pre in a DBX 386 are better than the ones in your D-16. You should get better results.
 
Art has a digital i/o box that may save you some big bucks while doing that task

Track rat. You are from ballwin mo. Im in the kansas city area myself. How far is ballwin from here (It seems there is a handful of us from arround kc).
 
Basiclly, it's St. Louis. About 300 miles. A good friend of mine lives in Olethea (is that spelled right?) and commutes here to record about every two weeks. Sometimes I take Amtrac there to party my brains out.:D
 
I think its olathe, Im just a stones throw literally from there.

st louis huh, How bout those royals. sweeping those cardnals again.

cant wait to see what the chiefs are going to do with all of the former rams 9 AFTER THE CHIEFS/ RAMS GAME THIS YEAR i WOULDNT HAVE CHANGE A THING)

sorry the caps lock got stuck on. E mial me as soon as you come to town and Ill have the place cleaned up.:D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top