Soloing: when to use major or minor pentatonic

  • Thread starter Thread starter cordura21
  • Start date Start date
gusfmm said:
I'm not mentioning "impressive" facts about anybody just for the sake of sounding intelligent. I've studied and learned contemporary harmony using Schomberg's book, and that's why I was recommending it to everyone. Talk to anybody who's got formal quality music theory training and you'll hear this book highlighted over any other method, provided you've got at least basic harmony studies before, as it's not the easiest one to use, but it's certainly the cornerstone of modern harmony.

The first time I thought it was a typo, but the man's name was Arnold Schönberg, or Schoenberg as transliterated into English.

For anyone not involved in this snowball fight who hasn't heard Pierrot Lunaire, I highly recommend it.
 
cordura21 said:
Thanks guys.
It doesn't seem logic to me since a dominant seventh chord has a major 3rd, while the minor scales 3rd is, well, minor.

And since C is E's relative minor, can you play E major pentatonic ( I guess you can)?

EDIT: SORRY, I MEAN D#

C# is E's relative minor.

Oh, sorry, just saw your edit: yes, but you'd call it Eb.
 
gusfmm said:
This is so BS that I don't think you even thought about it when you wrote this. Or perhaps you did... probably...
What if I play C Ionian over a C7 chord? What if I played a whole tone scale over a C7 chord? What if I played a disminished scale over a C7 chord? What if I played a (let's use guitar player's terminology) minor pentatonic scale over a C7 chord? How about the relative harmonic minor? Or perhaps A Aeolian???
Is any of those LESS TECHNICALLY CORRECT than your Mixolydian??? For God's sake.

In a TECHNICAL, THEORETICAL sense, yes they are less correct. Here we go:

The reason most people don't play Ionian over C7 is that the B clashes with the Bb.

The reason most people don't play whole tone over C7 is that the F# and G# clash with the G. (We're not talking about an altered C7 here.)

You could play a diminished scale over an unaltered C7 and it won't clash. Only the half-whole diminished though. The whole-half diminished would clash. And of course most people play a diminished scale over 7th chords with altered 9ths.

The reason most people don't play a minor pentatonic over a C7 chord is that the Eb would clash with the E.

The reason most people don't play the relative harmonic minor (in this case A harmonic minor) over a C7 chord is that the G# would clash with the G and the B would clash with the Bb.

A Aeolian is the same as C Ionian. You repeated yourself there. The B would clash with the Bb.


Now, if you study any basic jazz improv book, they're going to tell you the same thing. I really don't understand why you're being so pedantic about this. You obviously know that the Mixolydian if the 5th mode of the major scale, and you're dead set on saying that dominant chords ALWAYS suggest the key a 5th below (and you still have yet to explain a blues progression using that logic), so the "technically" correct mode for a 7th chord would be Mixolydian. I really don't understand the big deal about this.

I didn't say it's the only scale you can use; I didn't say any other scale was wrong. But just as Dorian is the "technically" correct mode that corresponds to the ii chord, Mixolydian is the technically correct mode that corresponds to the V chord. ANY basic book on jazz improv will second this. I challenge you to find one that doesn't.

Oh yeah, of course, if you pick those you are interested in and on top of that, you use only triads. So let me reformulate your question and still use your same F major example:

What if you got:
F Am Dm C
Can you tell whether this is F major again?

No. Those could be in C major of F major. What's your point? My point was that you don't need a V chord to identify a tonal center and I proved that. What's your point?

Now, had you used tetrads, then it'd another whole ball game. And not only that, but we haven't even gotten into harmonizing a minor scale such as the harmonic minor, or melodic minor. There are certainly much more possibilities there.

What does this have to do with the price of eggs? Again, my point was that you don't need a V chord to identify a tonal center.

A dominant chord ALWAYS defines a key center, and go back to your Harmony 101 school books. Even if the chord doesn't resolve to the tonic but to a relative V, or a substitute V7 or II-V7 progression, as is the ABC of Jazz music. Each V7 defines a especific key center. The way you play on those chord changes is by identifying the harmonic center of each "cluster" of chords (normally by recognizing the V7) and playing on the key of the I (tonic) chord corresponding to that. There are other ways too. And often, even the V7 is missing, so you have to "understand the context" of the chord changes.

Again, you still haven't answered this question. So, if you have a blues in C, and the chords are C7, F7, and G7, then should be thinking of playing in the keys of F, Bb, and C, respectively? If you think I don't know what a "dominant" chord is, or why it's called "dominant," then you're just simply mistaken. All I'm saying is that there are exceptions to this rule. A blues is the most obvious of all. If you have a stream of ii-V chords, then yes it's obvious that the V chord is the clue to the temporary key. But I could name a hundred songs where the I chord is a 7th chord. And in those instances, the 7th chord is NOT implying the key a 5th below! It IS the tonic! How can I put this more plainly?

Talk to anybody who's got formal quality music theory training and you'll hear this book highlighted over any other method, provided you've got at least basic harmony studies before, as it's not the easiest one to use, but it's certainly the cornerstone of modern harmony.

The "cornerstones" of "modern" harmony had been in place long, long before this book.
 
Of course it's logical that a 7th has a major 3d. It's a major chord.

Let's look at the way a 7th chord is built, using C as our starting point

The root note is C.

The third is E, which is 4 semi-tones above C (that's our major third, it's this note that gives us the tonality of the chord).

The fifth is G, which is 3 semi-tones above the E (a minor 3rd) and 7 above the C (a perfect 5th).

And, finally, the seventh is Bb, which is 3 semi-tones above G and 10 above C, which is a minor 7th.

If the intervals were min 3rd, maj 3rd, min 3rd it'd be a m7, but it's M3rd, m3rd, m3rd: I.E. A Dominant 7th (for it to be a Major 7th the sequence would have to be M3/m3/M3)

:)
 
mshilarious said:
The first time I thought it was a typo, but the man's name was Arnold Schönberg, or Schoenberg as transliterated into English.

For anyone not involved in this snowball fight who hasn't heard Pierrot Lunaire, I highly recommend it.

Yes you're correct. But he's made so many typos throughout this, I didn't bother correcting him.
 
yeah, well, I know how a Dominant 7th is made. The thing is, if it's a major chord, how can you play a minor scale?
 
cordura21 said:
Thanks guys.
It doesn't seem logic to me since a dominant seventh chord has a major 3rd, while the minor scales 3rd is, well, minor.

And since C is E's relative minor, can you play E major pentatonic ( I guess you can)?

EDIT: SORRY, I MEAN D#

You're right cordura, it doesn't seem "logical." But that's the enigma of blues. It's become commonplace to use that sound (the minor 3rd against the major 3rd) in bluesy styles. In fact, it's a big part of what sounds "bluesy" about it. Generally, you won't "resolve" your lines on the minor 3rd note. You usually use that note in the midst of a line or you sometimes hang on it a bit to create some musical tension.


And just a quick note regarding gusfmm's answer to your question, I wouldn't say it's terribly common to use the minor pentatonic built off the root of the IV chord. In a normal C blues, F minor pentatonic over F7 is going to sound a little sour. You don't hear this sound very often at all. Granted, you will hear it occasionally, but it's a far less common approach.

For a good example of someone who mixes the minor and major pentatonic over the I chord (C minor pent and C major pent over C7), listen to B.B. King.
 
AH!

Well, if it's a C7, then I guess the relative minor would be A in the Phrygian mode.

Right?
 
famous beagle said:
But when people say to approach a ii V I progression with "Dorian, Mixolydian, Ionian," that's just a waste of time. If you're in the same key the whole time, you don't need to worry about modes.

Amen to that.
 
famous beagle said:
You obviously know that the Mixolydian if the 5th mode of the major scale, and you're dead set on saying that dominant chords ALWAYS suggest the key a 5th below (and you still have yet to explain a blues progression using that logic), so the "technically" correct mode for a 7th chord would be Mixolydian. I really don't understand the big deal about this.
Well, to me it's definitely clear that there are countless things part of this discussion that go beyond your understanding. I wish you'd disclose your name, so that we all could check out your Hal Leonard's books.
But I have to admit and agree with you on one thing: One cann't deal on a thread like this with someone who is constantly changing arguments and putting words on another's mouth. It's become pointless and I'm sure all your crappy argumentation won't help much others.

But the following is really aggravating:

famous beagle said:
The "cornerstones" of "modern" harmony had been in place long, long before this book.
Could you base your idea on something and not be so vague, everyone wants to learn something (well, but you).
Please enlighten us on who/what, before Schonberg (thanks mshilarious), put in place the foundations of contemporary harmony?
 
Last edited:
mshilarious said:
The first time I thought it was a typo, but the man's name was Arnold Schönberg, or Schoenberg as transliterated into English.

For anyone not involved in this snowball fight who hasn't heard Pierrot Lunaire, I highly recommend it.
Thanks for the correction.

I'm sure most people have heard at least once the famous "Fire Bird Suite", which is still very tonal harmony-wise. "The Rite of Spring" is also kind of commonly heard, but is leaning more toward atonality. Pierrot Lunaire is probably the culprit of Schonberg's evolution into atonal music, and specifically his creation, the Dodecaphonism.

Glad to see you suggesting it.
 
gusfmm said:
Thanks for the correction.

I'm sure most people have heard at least once the famous "Fire Bird Suite", which is still very tonal harmony-wise. "The Rite of Spring" is also kind of commonly heard, but is leaning more toward atonality. Pierrot Lunaire is probably the culprit of Schonberg's evolution into atonal music, and specifically his creation, the Dodecaphonism.

Glad to see you suggesting it.

Those first two are Igor Stravinsky.
 
gusfmm said:
Well, to me it's definitely clear that there are countless things part of this discussion that go beyond your understanding. I wish you'd disclose your name, so that we all could check out your Hal Leonard's books.
But I have to admit and agree with you on one thing: One cann't deal on a thread like this with someone who is constantly changing arguments and putting words on another's mouth. It's become pointless and I'm sure all your crappy argumentation won't help much others.

But the following is really aggravating:


Could you base your idea on something and not be so vague, everyone wants to learn something (well, but you).
Please enlighten us on who/what, before Schonberg (thanks mshilarious), put in place the foundations of contemporary harmony?

Again, it's "Shoenberg." At least, that's how to type it without an umlaut (the little double dot) over the letter. In German, that double dot substitutes for an "e" after the vowel with the mark. So you can either write "Schönberg" or "Schoenberg," but not "Shonberg." That's a different name, and it's pronounced differently.

What I meant by my comment is that basic tonal harmony has been around since long before the Baroque period. Unless you mean something different by the term "modern harmony," who cares who wrote the book? The "rules" or conventions had been in place long before his time.

Please tell me, what goes beyond my understanding? What could you possibly tell me about music theory that I don't know? I really am curious. I don't claim to be a know-it-all, but I am very educated when it comes to music theory. Feel free to test me on anything you'd like. Here's a little test for you. What are the three types of Augmented 6th chords and how do you spell them?
 
famous beagle said:
Here's a little test for you. What are the three types of Augmented 6th chords and how do you spell them?

I-T-A-L . . .
 
famous beagle said:
What I meant by my comment is that basic tonal harmony has been around since long before the Baroque period. Unless you mean something different by the term "modern harmony," who cares who wrote the book? The "rules" or conventions had been in place long before his time.
See what I'm saying? Now you go for the tangent saying that TRADITIONAL HARMONY....blahblahblah.... and unless I meant something else by blahblahblah...
Of course modern harmony means something different. In short, as you're taking this to a non-sense dead-end, read about Schonberg, atonal music, Schonberg's book and educate yourself a little. Then you'll understand what modern/contemporary harmony is and what I meant by it.


famous beagle said:
Feel free to test me on anything you'd like. Here's a little test for you. What are the three types of Augmented 6th chords and how do you spell them?
Several things that you've missed all over this thread (I can't help it... you said Mixolydian was the only technically correct, sketched crappy arguments on why the others were not so correct, and then you agree that one of them, the diminished, should at least, be as correct as your Mixolydian...). No need to squeeze the stone anymore.
As for your question, leave that for some kid. Even if a German, Italian or a French didn't know the answer, they could always do an Internet search and get trillions of sites explaining it.
I'd be nice, again, if you were so kind to point us out to one of your various books, I'm really curious.
 
mshilarious said:
Those first two are Igor Stravinsky.
Very good mshilarious, glad I'm not alone. And the reason I mentioned Stravinsky's music is because some times HE is mentioned as the first one to truly break with the TRADITIONAL TONAL harmony and go ATONAL. Those two pieces are real art works.

Schonberg music was, in the beginning, very tonal and sort of following the lines of romantic music. Then he evolved into atonality, and later on created the so-called serial-music based on dodecaphonic series. Pierrot Lunaire is perhaps his most known piece, but there is another very interested piece, a Canon, he wrote for Alma Mahler, shortly after her husband Gustav (who Schonberg respected a lot) died.
 
I want to hear a collaboration between famous beagle and Gusfmm in the mp3 Mixing Clinic. It'd be a duel - one on the L channel, other on the right, trading phrases like in the movie Crossroads with Steve Vai and Ralph Macchio musically duking it out.

Tim
 
Timothy Lawler said:
I want to hear a collaboration between famous beagle and Gusfmm in the mp3 Mixing Clinic. It'd be a duel - one on the L channel, other on the right, trading phrases like in the movie Crossroads with Steve Vai and Ralph Macchio musically duking it out.

Tim

But Steve Vai defeats himself . . .

I can't put together the rhythm changes I suggested without people laughing at my drumming, but I wish someone would :confused:
 
gusfmm said:
Even if a German, Italian or a French didn't know the answer, they could always do an Internet search and get trillions of sites explaining it.

Which is an excellent resource that didn't exist when I studied theory. You pretty much had to take a class, or slog your way through books without the multimedia aids.
 
But Steve Vai defeats himself . . .

Dunno, I think he was defeated because he was EVIL. How can the devil's guitar slinger win against hot classical guitar played on electric?

Tim
 
Back
Top