Halion
New member
mshilarious said:
That's just what I was going for
Everybody seems to dislike the backing vox, but even though they are somewhat out of tune, I find them quite workable and definately worth something to the mix.
That's just what I was going for
Everybody seems to dislike the backing vox, but even though they are somewhat out of tune, I find them quite workable and definately worth something to the mix.
Disposable
New member
Nope, Ocnor, I don't listen to every mix that's posted up here...
I've not time, as I have dial-up,
I would be spending hours downloading them all.
Let alone listening time.
I listen to a couple here and there though.
I've not time, as I have dial-up,
I would be spending hours downloading them all.
Let alone listening time.
I listen to a couple here and there though.
K
Kainz
New member
Halion said:That's just what I was going for
I must say I'm waiting forward to hear your mix
Hopefully it is something different
I really haven't had any inspiration with the backvox.. They are indeed out of tune and have been sang with a bit too much "complexity" in it for a back vox. So it may be quite possible to make something nice out of these. So as I said, I'm really looking forward to hear your mix
ocnor
Lord Of The Thighs
That's exactly the point I was making. The judging is done by personal preference because true objective criteria doesn't exist.mshilarious said:Volunteer to manage that for PMC #12 and I bet xfinsterx would be happy
Seriously, gimme a list of objective criteria and I'll publish results, but I won't judge that way. It's too easy to mix by the numbers and still sound like poo.
HAPPY B-DAY Finster!
mshilarious
Banned
ocnor said:That's exactly the point I was making. The judging is done by personal preference because true objective criteria doesn't exist.
Getting a bit tired of this . . .
If I recall correctly, your mix was -11dB RMS. That's about 3 dB too loud, especially for a premaster.
Read this:
http://www.prorec.com/prorec/articles.nsf/files/8A133F52D0FD71AB86256C2E005DAF1C
How's that for objective?
If my memory is faulty, and that was somebody else's mix, the point is the same: objective criteria are being used in judging.
Disposable
New member
Hmm...
That's, IMO, a little too nit-picky,
And I sincerely hope that isn't a judging criteria...
That's, IMO, a little too nit-picky,
And I sincerely hope that isn't a judging criteria...
giraffe
i love negative rep
here's mine
here's mine.
i really had fun with this, thanks.
(back to listening to other entries)
ah crap, i just realized it's like 10 megs.
if thats too big a problem for anyone just let me know and i'll put up a smaller one!!!!
here's mine.
i really had fun with this, thanks.
(back to listening to other entries)
ah crap, i just realized it's like 10 megs.
if thats too big a problem for anyone just let me know and i'll put up a smaller one!!!!
Disposable
New member
Hey Giraffe. I think you have taken the most artistic approach of all the mixes I've listened to so far...
And I have to say that makes yours my favorite. Good job.
And I have to say that makes yours my favorite. Good job.
mshilarious
Banned
Disposable said:
This is the last post I'll make on this thread on my theory of judging--please post on this thread if you want to continue the discussion:
http://www.homerecording.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=156225
Disposable
New member
mshilarious said:
Reading that takes a lot of the fun out of this...
It's likely I'll experiment on my own with these tracks,
And may or may not enter the contest...
Thanks for the reference though ms.
Somehow I get the feeling you are an aspiring actuary...
giraffe
i love negative rep
yea, i'm starting to realize i'm fairly alone on some of my ideas, make sure you listen to mine through to the end, some of the most fun stuff i did.
ocnor
Lord Of The Thighs
mshilarious said:
We seem to be talking about 2 different things. I was in no way referring to your critique of my mix or anyone else's mix. My curiosity was with the way the contest is judged not with you personally. I thought you of all people would be interested in what the difference in the results might be with different judging methods.
I doubt that I will even submit an official entry now as I seemed to have inadvertently pissed you off.
mshilarious
Banned
ocnor said:
No, it takes a lot more to piss me off than that. I am concerned that this thread is getting very long with this discussion and there's still three weeks to go, so please, let's pick it up on the other thread.
X
xfinsterx
New member
ocnor said:
Whoa,Whoa,Whoa!!
Dude Ocnor, Please by all means submit your entry!
I think we are getting off base here.
More than judging, winning prizes, or even mixing, i wanted these contests to be a place where we can all hang out and have fun with each other, while learning!
I understand your points with the judging Ocnor, and they are valid, good points!
How's about you and i talk about co-ordinating a different style of panel for PMC12? Im always open to ideas ok?
But bro...dont pull your entry ok?
Thanks.
-Finster
K
Kainz
New member
ocnor said:
Cmon.. Don't pull it out
bennychico11
...
xfinsterx said:Thanks buddy!
Actually Jack's gonna get aquainted with my steak marinade (gonna BBQ) before he gets started on me!
God im a sap for BBQ.
Carry On!!
birthday?? shit dude....happy b-day!!!
Come to KC and I'll make (actually buy...since I can't cook worth a crap) some REAL bbq
M
MacLes
New member
HAPPY BIRTHDAY, CHRIS !
X
xfinsterx
New member
bennychico11 said:birthday?? shit dude....happy b-day!!!
Come to KC and I'll make (actually buy...since I can't cook worth a crap) some REAL bbq
Youd be suprised to know im actually from Kansas.
Witchita.
Thanks Ben.
G
geet73
OMG!
Happy birthday, duder.
Dogman
Unkle Ticklefingers
May must be the month. Happy B-Day Chris.
And, if benny is buying, I just may drive to KC.
Ed
And, if benny is buying, I just may drive to KC.
Ed
