
superspit
idiots unite!
Oh sure
just like sm57 and d-112 sound the same
"flat sound"? Does that mean "accurate"? If so then yeah, I hate it so bad when something does *exactly* what I tell it to. I would so much rather it does some random shit
Here is *some* of my rack gear
![]()
![]()
![]()
If I thought for one second that there was something audibly "worse" about using plugins, I could just plug the rack gear in. For the most part, far and wide, I don't. Sometimes if I will plug in the eventide or the m5k for reverb, but when the session is over I'll take an impulse and add it to the library, so that hopefully I won't have to bother the next time.
Of course, eventide and tc electronics are "just" dsp, but I've even seen some people say "digital hardware FX can be ok, but digital software FX will never be" Huh?
Plugins are not all good at providing that feedback loop to your brain the was *some* one knob per function hardware units are. This can cause people to rightly not like them. But claims about their sound being inferior in any way are downright silly
maybe it's (the rack thing) just a 'tactile' thing?......
I think when he used the word 'flat' it wasn't in the 'accurate translation' sence..(and I suspect you knew that Pipey!!)

Yeah, logic tells me that you're right about the differences in DSP units and Plugs. (or lack thereof!).....I was thinkin of racks that provide classic 'digital' processing of the incoming signal.....I never considered the 'DSP' side of things on this topic.
Anyways...to digress, have you guys seen plugs that have a 'processor intensity or 'amount of use'' function?.......There is one on the 'Ambience Reverb' plug (which I actually like alot!)....now turn down the amount of prox control, and the whole thing goes to shit!...(sorry...course sounding and choppy)......
I think I'm just being silly now....but I bet some of you would see the irony in this!!......


