Oktava Omni vs Cardioid Frequency Response
Marik said:
Re: omni. In theory, the omni capsule should be stiffness controlled and tuned into top range. That's the reason why they don't do LD true omnies--too large to get good and long lasting tension. Decrease of back-chamber volume with sealing the back helps to increase tuning resonance. Have you had chance to measure it?
How its top end? On the other hand, knowing your passion for "Russian sound", I am sure some top roll off would not bother you much... .
Still haven't set up my studio and done any recording after the move so I'd say I'm still recovering.
I found my analysis files comparing my omni mod Omni MK-219 with a cardioid MK-219. Both mics have had their HF boost discs removed so the response at 12kHz is down 3.5dB from a stock mic. I'll give the general trend of the high frequency end of the response curves...
Cardioid MK-219, HF boost disc removed:
on-axis:
3kHz 6kHz 12kHz
0dB +2dB +3dB then sharp cutoff above 14kHz
Omni MK-219, HF boost disc removed,
on-axis:
3kHz 6kHz 12kHz
0dB -1dB -3dB
-90 degrees
3kHz 6kHz 12kHz
0dB 0dB -7dB
-180 degrees
3kHz 6kHz 12kHz
0dB -3dB -9dB
then sharp cutoff above 14kHz in all cases.
So my omni mod MK-219 on-axis is down about 9.5dB at 12kHz compared to a completely stock mic, down 6dB from a boost-disc removed mic, but...it is only down 3dB from flat at 12kHz which makes for a good room mic. By aiming the room mic either toward or away from the source I can control the spectral content of the room vs direct sound.
Actually, the on axis sound for close mic'd vocals is pretty nice - there is a clarity that comes with removing the back wave propagation nessessary to create the cardioid pattern. I've used it with great success for voice-over work in a near-anechoic announcers booth
As a point of reference, compare the frequency response of these Octavas with a Studio Projects C1 which is up about 12dB at 12kHz!