In another post, I asked why my recordings sounded GREAT in my headphones, but not so great after I mixed down and played the tape in other tape players. The replies I got were that headphones can't be used as trusted monitors for mixing down. I can easily believe that because I heard the difference myself....... But here's a question: Where did that GREAT sound in my headphones come from? Did it not come from my analog 4-track?
Granted I've been unable to get a mirror image of that sound mixed onto the final tape as of yet, (I'm a recorder of no more than 2 months experience), but since I heard it to begin with.... it must have been in there.
If in the future, my mixing skills improve and I'm able to duplicate that absolutely AWESOME headphone sound (that was playing from a 4-track analog source), perhaps the new question will be this.... If the pro's could still tell a slight difference in the quality, would increasing that minimal sound quality difference be proportional with the cost difference of their gear and my "budget" gear?
Perhaps the pro's would disagree that the sound difference would be slight? We'll, as a non-pro studio recorder..... I guess that makes me pro-everyday-joe..... So, then perhaps another good question is: Who's my band's audience anyway? A bunch of everyday joe's or a bunch of pro recorders?
While I do want the best sound I can get, (& I appreciate ALL of your input), my mission is to get my band's sound out to the people so that my band can progress... Not necessarily to get my recording skills out to the people so I alone can progress.... (That's a good thing, huh..... Otherwise I'd better not hold my breath, huh?)
If I can accomplish this mission with gear thousands of dollars less than the pro's, it sort of seems like the budget gear was the right tool for the job...