Mix contest

  • Thread starter Thread starter caryindy
  • Start date Start date
Fusion2 said:
ok, where's BB?... your post count dropped off the scale when this contest finally got moving, no, not your opinion :D your mix please ;)

then your opinions... heh...
Been busy... mixing an album at the moment, so I'm not sure when I can get to it.... it's on my task list though!
 
The original server was much faster, but even at the current file location I downloaded the files to my job this morning and it took 40 minutes.

MM and blue bear - I'm very eager to hear your mix. :) I hope you are able to post one.
 
mixmkr said:
my $.02... none of the mixes have yet to improve on the original

you can have your 2 cents back. Most of the mixes are a huge improvement on the original rough mix.
 
I'm having trouble just finding where everyone's versions are, sifting through all these pages.

Once everone's done, can we maybe put all of them together on one page . . . or at least all the links together on the same post?
 
I have been wanting to go back and fix my mix a bit with some sugguestions that I have heard from people so far.

Is this cheating?:D
 
Caryindy: Thanks for the good input.

caryindy said:
Intro - I think the balance between the guitar and the vocal is a bit off. Perhaps having the acoustic a bit louder there would make things better. Vocals are dry. That's not bad by definition, just sounds a little naked with just the acoustic guitar.
Yep, should have added some verb here for sure and the vocal is definitely "up front". Could have balanced this better.

When the drums come in, they are over powering the rest of the band. There's something off in that drum fill at 0:35. If you were getting paid to mix this, this may have been an area where you would do a little fixing. In this case, it happens to be the kick drum coming in too early for the last two hits of the fill. Take a look at how the kick is not synced to the beginning of the bass guitar part.
Yeah, that's mainly the snare (with all that reverb). During the chorus sections I think I've got it balanced better, but I probably should have toned it down in the beginning. Also right about the fill. I noticed it and if I were doing this for credit would have tried to fix it.

Did you use some sort of plug-in on the bass? I hear something like distortion???
All I did to the bass was a little compression (if memory serves) and a slight EQ adjustment to fatten the bottom end. It seemed to take on a little "rumble" that was unintentional, but I kinda liked it so I didn't mess with it.

I like how you split the vocals at 1:02. Nice. :)
At least I did SOMETHING right ;)

You took out that last guitar line. Again, in the real world scenario of mixing for a client, you may have upset the guitarist. Perhaps you could have taken the guitar track and sent it out through a miced amp to re-record it and fatten it up. You could also try a plug like Amplitude. Take a listen to my mix and see if you think the guitar line sounds any fatter than the original. I'm surprised nobody picked up on that.
Again, you're right. If I were doing this for a client I would not have done this without their agreement. This is just a personal thing, but that last guitar phrase didn't work for me. It didn't really fit with anything else in the song so I tried to have the ending line up more with the solo section. Taking out that guitar phrase was done quite abruptly and is why the rest of that guitar section isn't any louder in the mix. I did use a little EQ on that guitar part, but not much since I kept it kinda buried.

One final comment on my mix: On the last chord there was an open string on each of the guitar parts that rang longer/louder than the rest. These notes weren't exactly intoned to one another which set up a flange-ish thing I didn't like. I was dropping the guitar parts one-by-one to see if I could find the culprit. When I got back to just the acoustic, I thought it sounded kinda neat alone. So voila, an artsy ending. The only question is, should it have been louder?

Gary
 
Voxjockey-

Check your mix in mono. I've never heard a mix do this before. It's weird. When I switch it to mono, the acoustic completely disapears!
 
fenix said:
Voxjockey-

Check your mix in mono. I've never heard a mix do this before. It's weird. When I switch it to mono, the acoustic completely disapears!

Ahhh the mixdown goblins are out for Halloween a bit early! Are you sure you're getting a full mix of the stereo channels in mono mode? Mine sounded OK, but if I listen to just the left channel the acoustic disappears because it's panned right. Either that or I need to replace David Copperfield in Vegas :D

Gary
 
You guys need to quit copying those damned accoustic tracks and hardpanning them out of phase. :D
 
Kramer said:
I've listened to all the mixes at least 10 times each in the last few days,and IMHO caryindy posted the best mix hands down,and I posted the worse 20 minute mix on record.:eek:

None of the mixes sounded "mastered" compared to commercial CD's.

Did any of you guys A/B with a commercial CD for comparison?

I thought your mix was pretty good, I can't remember exactly now and I don't know which one it is. I seem to recall it had a nice warm sound to it.
 
voxjockey said:
Mine sounded OK, but if I listen to just the left channel the acoustic disappears because it's panned right. Either that or I need to replace David Copperfield in Vegas :D

Gary

ah, maybe that's what i did.
 
Kramer said:
I've listened to all the mixes at least 10 times each in the last few days,and IMHO caryindy posted the best mix hands down,and I posted the worse 20 minute mix on record.:eek:

None of the mixes sounded "mastered" compared to commercial CD's.

Did any of you guys A/B with a commercial CD for comparison?

I thought your mix was pretty good, I can't remember exactly now and I don't know which one it is. I seem to recall it had a nice warm sound to it.
 
Kramer said:
None of the mixes sounded "mastered" compared to commercial CD's.

That might have something to do with the fact that not many of us here can quite afford the luxury of sending some song we threw together for a mixing competition on homerecording.com off to a mastering house. :D Would've if I could've, but that might not have been very fair competition. :D
 
Blue Bear Sound said:
Been busy... mixing an album at the moment, so I'm not sure when I can get to it.... it's on my task list though!

alrighty then, this mixfest has turned out "very impressive" imho...

ok all you lurking techs, post em... ;)
 
the more i tweak (posted tips) the more ways i find to enhance, at this rate, i'll finish my mix by 04 i'm sure ;)

addictively tech, rewarding, etc, imho... eh, at my age it rivals sex, naw ;) almost though...
 
Doug H said:
I thought your mix was pretty good, I can't remember exactly now and I don't know which one it is. I seem to recall it had a nice warm sound to it.

Thanks Doug.:o I've listened to these mixes so many times,and now Im sick of this song.LOL.Mine sounds worse to me each time I listen to it.I pointed out caryindys mix as just a reference as to what sounded the "best" to me.Just my taste of course.ALL of the mixes sound good.That one just stood out to me after listening to them all numerous times.I burned them onto a disc and they all sound pretty even on a Car Stereo.

I think mixmkr is right about none of the mixes actually getting much better than the original one.

Im a novice(I SUCK AND I KNOW IT) at this stuff but it's fun to play around with!
 
chessrock said:
That might have something to do with the fact that not many of us here can quite afford the luxury of sending some song we threw together for a mixing competition on homerecording.com off to a mastering house. :D Would've if I could've, but that might not have been very fair competition. :D

Well I know that.LOL.I just mentioned that because the phrase "mastered" was used in a couple of posts in this thread.:p

I think when most people around here use the word "master",they really mean "final MIX".
 
Kramer said:

I think when most people around here use the word "master",they really mean "final MIX".

to expand on that, it would be "final mix cuz i don't have enough money to get it pro mastered."
 
I realize this may be construed as somewhat biased, but to say that none of the mixes were an improvement over the initial rough mix? ahem! :D I'm a/b'ing a couple of them right here, and there's just no comparison. Kick, snare, electric guitar . . . all much more present. You'd almost have to be deaf not to hear it. Then again, my view is going to have an obviously biased slant.
 
Back
Top