HRC Attempt #1

  • Thread starter Thread starter crawdad
  • Start date Start date
5 Stars!I like the dry vocal version a LOT better.Excellent singing man.You have got a great voice crawdad.

*****
 
The vocal sounds good on both but i rather the "verbed" one......it just fits the song and vibe better.......if the Lord had intended us to record dry vocals, he wouldnt have given us Lexicons......










crawdad, check your PM's.....
 
Gidge said:
if the Lord had intended us to record dry vocals, he wouldnt have given us Lexicons......

Gidge, why did the Lord not give me a Lexicon? How did you get one?

I knew I should have gone to Sunday school....

:(


Oh by the way, Al. That -12 thing is just a target I go for. If it jumps to -6 I don't exactly start throwing my guitars around. I wait until the phone rings during a good take before I do that...
 
well, I used "Lexicon" just as an example....it really depends on which Lord you worship, the quality of reverb unit you get......mine gave me Waves plugins......the Lexicons are more for the Southern Baptists......of course the Jehovahs Witnesses just go door to door looking for reverb units to recruit......the Amish mic their water well to get reverb the old fashion way (the depth of the water controls the amount of veb)......the Catholics get that nice big church reverb but of course it isnt very portable and if you have younger boys in the band, you have to keeping beating the priest off of them (did i say beat off?!!).......















(if I offended anyone, or forgot to offend anyone, i aplogize sincerely)
 
man, do I want to go get the strat out, and J-staion, and freaking tare it up on this shit. some great bluesy, smooth playing going on here. I hope you don't mind. But!!!!!!! Shit. This is great.

Thanks,

Dan
 
Sounds great. Nice big sound. That vocal effect with the mics is pretty cool. Very smooth sound overall.
 
sounds great as always man!

damn... you fooled me with the natural reverb.
must be one of those tricks you have :)


great listen man... awsome!
 
Now that's what I wanted to hear!

Straight crawdad, no mixer, no ice.:D

You have the perfect voice for this kind of stuff. I agree with flat-9 on the "seasoned" thing. I like it.

You don't sound as much like Seger without the effects.;) That's a good thing.:)

I think you need a different mic though. While that one doesn't sound bad, it doesn't compliment your voice. I think you need something brighter & cleaner.
 
I was really comfortable sitting and listening to this. I`m familiar with your presentation now. It sounds like Al doing his thing, with or without the mics and toys. :)
 
Niiiice!!

Nice and tight, and I actually dig the stark, upfront ambience! Don't sell yourself short man, you're good au naturel!!

Kinda reminded me of Seger's Turn The Page, except yours isn't annoying. :D
 
Like a lot of others, I'm sure--there a WHOLE LOT MORE I'd like to be doing with recording. Writing, experimenting and trying to get to the next level, whatever that is. A few comments-

Lt. Bob--Yeah, its dry as a bone! Man, I am losing my mind. I can't remember if I used the V93 or the AT 4033, but I THINK the V93. Yes, it WAS. Its coming back. Well, they say memory is the second thing to go....:D

Scottboyer--Maybe the lack of verb is a good thing, but I'm like you--I want to swim in that stuff!

Gidge--you have way more recording skills than you may know. If you can get a Pacifica so sound so sweet through a modeler, you have something I WISH I had. I've never liked one modeled guitar track and I've played through 'em all. Just another thing I need to dive into more.

flat-9--too many whiskeys and smokes! between that and singing six nights a week, my voice is actually a wreck right now. I'm gonna get Roto-Rooter to snake it out or something. Or, gee...maybe cut the habits and get my sorry ass healthy again!:D

ChrisHarris--I'll take 'em--fake or real. At my age, it doesn't matter!

Kramer--so you like me naked--is that what you're saying?:D God, I was dying to reach for some room FX to stick that vocal in, but I bit the bullet for the HR crew--this time!

SluiCe--I hear ya. The -12 is just a guide not a rule.

dtb--I want to get some electrics in there myself. I just need the time when I can fire the tube amp up and blast. hard to find that moment around this house these days.

TexRoadkill--That no EQ thing IS smooth. Thats one of the things I liked about this experiment. Of course, I still wanted to tweak stuff, which would have totally changed it, I suppose. I think that with PERFECT mic technique and placement, I could actually go this way more often, but I still have some experimenting to do. Lord, I just need more time!

JMarcomb--I also did a mix sans the vocal effects. Doing the sliding tracks echo was something I always wanted to try. Those old studios used to use a speaker in a tank or room and mic the speaker for their reverb. The board would send right to a power amp and speaker and the mic would be a distance from the speaker, picking up the reflections from the tank. I was hoping to get that, but I got something else!

M. Brane--I've been searching for the right mic for me. I've had great results with several on SOME things, but then bad results too. My throat is raspy right now and I seem to have developed a supreme sibilance that I'm always fighting. Grrr....again, I need more time to dial things in.

Toki987--Yeah, its Al doing his thing! Lol!

Llarion--I DO dig the starkness too. I'm looking at it as another flavor for the pallette. I don't think I'd want to do a whole album like this, but a couple tunes--you bet!
 
Re: Great job!

M.Brane said:
Although I was kind of looking forward to hearing your voice straight-up. You don't need the vocal effects as much as you think you do!:p

That's what I was thinking: good singers like Crawdad don't need fx. This is absolutely amazing...

I LOVE the dry vocal sound, Crawdad. If you ever decide to ditch the fx, you got at least one fan left (ok, a silly dutch boy...perhaps that doesn't count ;) )

You rock!
 
It's great. What would be good now, I think, would be a great bluesy string arrangment, then maybe a little ambience over the whole thing (good ambience... I think that's the one thing that is really impossible in home recording, is not having those rooms and chambers that studios have, but maybe Samplitude and SIR will figure it out somewhat for us virtual types), and then master it and press it!

Macle
 
Man Crawdad,you could sound great with a RS mic and a cassette tape!
We don't need no stinkin reverb!:D

Great writing,singing,and playing as always.
Your vocals soar no matter how you record them!

Sometimes I think we all add too many effects,and do too much processing.
Mabey one of the lesson learned from this exercise is,less is more.
Or can be.

Pete
 
Hey Dad,
I havent read back all of the responses to this, so i hope im not redundant.
....first off, I LOVE the uncompressed and dry vibe of the vocals during the verses. It seems to give it its own effect that sounds very intentional. ...very intimate.
Re: the -12 thingy, Ive done a little experimentation w/ that myself, and I think i understand why its useful in a situation where you boost the gain in your compression. Im not sure its a good "blanket" thing to do in all tracking because of lost resolution that would occur when not using alot of gain, but definitely a cool thing to use when a person intends to boost the gain later.
Very nice Dad, and very very intimate...... I felt like i was there watching you sing this. ..beautiful.
gw/5
 
listening to "I Can't Change mix"...

I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but you sound a bit like Elvis here and there. In a good way of course. He's the man.

Laidback song. Not really my style but I wouldn't change the channel if this was on the radio. Vocals sound like they are in a different place compared to the rest of the mix. Maybe it's that echo/reverb. I'd use more reverb on the snare since this has room for it, being a slowie. No other mix comments. Song works and I suppose it's good for its style. I wouldn't know too much.

Hmm... you can forget all my comments if this was supposed to be unmixed :D (I'm a bit confused, since there's the other "can't change" on your site that has no description)
 
Wanted to jump in real quick here.

Tracking - Great

Playing - Great

Voice - Always the money card with you. "Reverbed" or dry. You could run your voice through a dog whistle and it would still come out sounding sweet! I really like how you acheived the reverb sound. Creative! I also like the dry. I would say the song calls for some reverb for sure. Maybe bring out the presence (dry vocal) some on the wetter version. Or just mix like you want it when this challenge is over :p

Song - Good. No really my style, but very well written as usual.

Nice!!!
 
This was obviously no real challange to you as far as instraments go.The vox sounds a bit "coffee canish".You are truely a great song writer.This is real top notch music.As good as anything I've heard from the lame ass radio.This could seriously become mainstream counrty/rock cross over-ish type rythm and blues.Like Bad Company and Stevie Ray.Uh-oh...that ride sounds crappy/fake.Mix is fine,fine,fine.Great lyrics,too.Nice job.
 
Back
Top