CMunch
Well-known member
yep ..... until you dropped it. NOW what'll we do?
Try and come up with something original that will be of interest to the guitar players at HR.
yep ..... until you dropped it. NOW what'll we do?
Try and come up with something original that will be of interest to the guitar players at HR.
No need to totally exclude yourself there munch..
Save it for the cave multi.
yeah, but when do talk about tuners, we definitely have to give serious consideration to Locking Tuners. No guitar should be without them.
I like that except ..... the upper bout is rounded while the bottom is very sharp like an SG. I think you ought to try and meet the two in the middle somewhere.Here's a first stab at a surf design.
Some of my favourite records wouldn't be anything like as good if they didn't have slight tuning issues - White man in Hammersmith Palais by the Clash is one that immediately springs to mind. On the other hand some of the worst songs ever committed to any form of encoded music reproduction were performed on guitars with locking nuts, bridge fine adjustment tuners, etc. They are the work of Satan.
I know of Mutt's severe disdain for locking tuners despite the ambivalence in his post. He is just not going to let me get him worked up over it. Eh, I tried. Cheers Muttley!!!
yeah ...... locking tuners don't have squat to do with a guitar staying in tune better. They're simply useful for tossing a string on quickly.I have no disdain for locking tuners just the people who insist they will cure problems that they can't. That and the fact that a decent set of normal tuners is just as good if not better...
Just a sketch I was playin' with. And a Carvin just to show a pretty finish.
My mileage may vary!
Still think the lower bout is out of proportion. Needs to be less and rounder on the lower bout. It's a bit too firebird to my eye..
The headstock I have some ideas for. Ton's of ideas in for I'll post later...