Recording Engineer said:
You're getting into "reputation based on past product here", which people on this BBS, yourself included, have snickered at in the past.
Look, RE. You're basically clueless on Mike, Sytek, his product, his manufacturing etc. etc.
As much as I am clueless about Davisound.
However, my point is that they are both very similar in a lot of ways. Both of them have horrible web sites. One is garrish and overdone . . . the other is woefully lacking in information. Either way, none of them speak well of the company.
Another similarity is that neither of the guys play the name-dropping game, the endorsement game or the review game. And purposely so, because both are technicians who's sole focus is on the product. Hell, Mike doesn't even speak English all that well.

These aren't marketing guys by any stretch.
Ultimately, you've got two companies with very similar philosophies. The difference being that one goes around over-hyping the fact that they're "not overhyped."

A true contadiction in itself. Davisound boy puts together this garrish, annoying web site in order to spread the message that he's not a garrish company.

Now that, to me, raises some red flags.
Not to mention the fact that, despite their lack of schmoozing and marketing hype, Sytek has managed to get positive magazine reviews and industry endorsements anyway. Now that amazes me. Magazines generally don't review products unless they're advertisers. For Sytek to get reviews like that without spending a single advertising dollar . . . and without ANY self-promotion really says something to me.
Shit, Alan surfs and posts on the boards, hustling his ass off all freakin' day and buys ads left and right in order to get the kind of press for SP that Sytek does while hiding in their little warehouse/shop in a small Chicago suburb . . . not even making so much as a peep unless someone tries real hard to draw him out of his cave.
I don't snicker at guys who can manage that. That's called "bullshit detector reports negative."