D
ds21
New member
what is a good mic for a female with a very strong sibilance? nothing too expensive, maybe in the $500 range, definitely under $1000, how about one of the tube mics? don't need any presence peak in the 7K range!
C
chessparov
New member
Electro-Voice EV RE20 (or PL20).
And it usually sounds good (or better) on most any other singer to boot.
Chris
And it usually sounds good (or better) on most any other singer to boot.
Chris
A
AGCurry
New member
ds21, nothing smooths out sibilance like a good ribbon mic. For less than $500, try a Beyer M160, M500, M260, or M130, or a used Shure 300, 330, or SM33.
For a little under $1000, you can get a new AEA R84, which is a great microphone.
For a little under $1000, you can get a new AEA R84, which is a great microphone.
C
chessrock
Banned
These are both excellent suggestions from Chessparov and Curry.
As far as condensers go, you might check out the Audio Technica 4050. I've found it to be a very non-sibilant mic for most singers.
Groove Tubes MD1-B is also a sleeper.
As far as condensers go, you might check out the Audio Technica 4050. I've found it to be a very non-sibilant mic for most singers.
Groove Tubes MD1-B is also a sleeper.
B
Big Kenny
New member
Where in Wisconsin are you? I've got a couple you could try out.
RE20, Groove Tube 1B, AST4033, Baby bottle, senn441
I'm in Wales right in between Milwaukee and Madison
In His Name
Big Kenny
RE20, Groove Tube 1B, AST4033, Baby bottle, senn441
I'm in Wales right in between Milwaukee and Madison
In His Name
Big Kenny
C
chessrock
Banned
Big Kenny said:
Another good one.
L
lbcstudios
New member
at 4040.. although this mic is only about 300.. under ur 500 u wanted to spend... i recorded my cousin with it.. she was about 6 inches away... it had some mad sibililance... never used a baby bottle tho.... good luck -LBC
Blue Bear Sound
New member
I second the Beyer M160... it's great for VO or vocals where sibilance is an issue.
B
bgavin
New member
The Beyer M160 and M260 appear very similar.
Can anybody comment on the differences?
Can anybody comment on the differences?
A
AGCurry
New member
I have one of each. They LOOK different (shape of head). The main difference to my ears is that the M160 has a greater proximity effect - which you could also call greater bass response, I guess. I think the 160 was designed for music recording, where the 260 was designed for the spoken word.
B
bgavin
New member
The docs on the M260 specifically point out an HPF circuit to reduce proxmity. I also notice the response plots are different, and the M160 has a higher rolloff.
Similar threads
