Do you really buy that expensive recording software?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fantastic_Mad
  • Start date Start date

Do you buy that expensive recording software, or just download it?(Read authors post)

  • I buy it. I like to support the creator.

    Votes: 564 41.2%
  • I download it. To hell with the creator.

    Votes: 305 22.3%
  • I do both. I have mixed feelings on the subject.

    Votes: 501 36.6%

  • Total voters
    1,370
Status
Not open for further replies.
Pinky said:
The only people that seem to have the greatest objection are those who HAVE paid $600+ for the software they use. It's almost a badge to allow them to bash others on internet forums. lol
The only badge I see here is on the guys using the internet to justify their stealing. Let me see one of you go into guitar center and steal the latest copy of cubase from them. You would stand there and tell them there is nothing wrong with stealing software while they cart your ass off to jail? I think not, but you'll sit there all day long hiding behind a keyboard and do it.

Why not try going to Barnes and Noble and leaving a quarter to cover the cost of the plastic while you steal the latest copy of your favorite music? You can tell them of course that they don't lose anything this way because you wouldn't have bought it anyway, right? Again, I think not, geesh, talk about hiding behind a badge :eek: :o :D :D
 
NYMorningstar said:
Why not try going to Barnes and Noble and leaving a quarter to cover the cost of the plastic while you steal the latest copy of your favorite music? You can tell them of course that they don't lose anything this way because you wouldn't have bought it anyway, right?

Nice! ;)
 
Wow are people actually trying to justify stealing? :eek:

Doesn't matter if the companies don't lose actual physical property or money/profits, or if you "wouldn't buy it anyway". It's still stealing. At least live up to what you do. Cowards.

Oh, and there's plenty of cheap good gear, and cheap software just as, if not more capable than most expensive software. There are no reasons to steal.

Even if I work in a 'pro' studio and have plenty of nice gear to work with, I still love the home recording aspect, and working with what you have. I have no respect for anyone who steals their software or anything they use.

But go ahead. Chances are you won't make the most of it anyway and it will do you no good. You will still wonder why your recordings are lacking. And maybe one day you will realize the software has nothing to do with it. It's your lazy nature.
 
NYMorningstar said:
The only badge I see here is on the guys using the internet to justify their stealing. Let me see one of you go into guitar center and steal the latest copy of cubase from them. You would stand there and tell them there is nothing wrong with stealing software while they cart your ass off to jail? I think not, but you'll sit there all day long hiding behind a keyboard and do it.

Why not try going to Barnes and Noble and leaving a quarter to cover the cost of the plastic while you steal the latest copy of your favorite music? You can tell them of course that they don't lose anything this way because you wouldn't have bought it anyway, right? Again, I think not, geesh, talk about hiding behind a badge :eek: :o :D :D


BECAUSE! IT IS PHYSICAL PROPERTY! If You steal a hard copy of cubase they actually manufactured the discs, manuals, packaging, sold it to guitar center for a wholesale price for it to be sold to people. You're taking something that has actual monetary value, not just theoretical, or projected value. It's always the worst comparison, and people keep making it. Don't you know the difference between taking a physical thing that has investment made in that exact copy of it, vs making a copy of something which hasn't cost anyone for that exact unit. The second the software companies have to pay for every digitial copy they make of software, then this will be a good arguement...it really isn't a good comparison man. Barnes and noble didn;t manufacture the book man. They paid a wholesale price which was beyond what it cost to make, otherwise the printers, and book publishers, writer, etc wouldn't make any money. Ripping off a retail outlet is totally different, no matter how many times you want to compare it.
 
Nameless said:
Wow are people actually trying to justify stealing? :eek:

Doesn't matter if the companies don't lose actual physical property or money/profits, or if you "wouldn't buy it anyway". It's still stealing. At least live up to what you do. Cowards.

Oh, and there's plenty of cheap good gear, and cheap software just as, if not more capable than most expensive software. There are no reasons to steal.

Even if I work in a 'pro' studio and have plenty of nice gear to work with, I still love the home recording aspect, and working with what you have. I have no respect for anyone who steals their software or anything they use.

But go ahead. Chances are you won't make the most of it anyway and it will do you no good. You will still wonder why your recordings are lacking. And maybe one day you will realize the software has nothing to do with it. It's your lazy nature.


actually, most cheap gear sounds like shit, cheap software tho...tere's lots of good cheap software... however with things such as sample discs...there are no acceptable cheap alternatives to the high end orchestral libraries. Nothing... It's not stealing man...it's all just manipulating information... to steal something you have to actually take something physical from someone or some company. Making a copy isn't stealing anything, unless you are replicating it for resale or something of that sort (i.e. stealing an idea)

People are hillarious how they call people cowards as one of the first insults they can think of, even if it has nothing to do with what they're talking about. You always hear on the news, someone blows someone's head off...what cowardly acts... umm no, totally fucked up, but not cowardly... Look the word up in the dictionary. :)
 
SouthSIDE Glen said:
Give it up guys. We've heard it all, read it all, been there, done that, there's nothing there, and it gets really boing after a while.

I can't believe you seriously played the Jack Kennedy card. I was joking about that earlier. The only young zealot cards you haven't played yet and are about to are the Roswell/Area 51 card and the "MSH and I are both 'one of them'" card stating that the only reason we are arguing so vehemently against you guys is because we are members ourselves and we're just trying to spread disinformation to keep zealots like you quelled.

I got news for you guys. You want something to be paranoid about? *Everybody* is a member of that group except for you. There is no shadow conspiracy, it's right out in the open; it's called the real world. It's you guys that are hiding in the shadows. You guys are all alone and the more you protest the real world, the more alone you will become.

You have a choice; go on blaming your irresponsibile software theft on the people who assasinated President Kennedy (LOL, now there's a sentence I never thought I'd have to type :D) and find yourself increasingly alienated and alone in this world. Or you can just grow up, take responsibility for your own lives and make a change by being an example to others instead of blaming God-as-conspirator for your own troubles.

I don't have any more time for this crap. Back to the real world for me.

G.


wow, the connections you make are hillarious. The people who killed kennedy have nothing to do with software companies... however big media companies ARE in bed with some of the same people who are in the circle of fuckers that most likely were responsible. Who really knows though, maybe it was mother terisa conspiring with pope hitler youth, and santa claus...wasn't oswald though.
 
and with all that said...


*FART!*

don't take yourselves so seriously! have a drink and laugh like hell!
 
TerraMortim said:
BECAUSE! IT IS PHYSICAL PROPERTY! If You steal a hard copy of cubase they actually manufactured the discs, manuals, packaging, sold it to guitar center for a wholesale price for it to be sold to people. You're taking something that has actual monetary value, not just theoretical, or projected value. It's always the worst comparison, and people keep making it.
It is what it is. Are you trying to say the paper and plastic are worth $600?
 
TerraMortim said:
BECAUSE! IT IS PHYSICAL PROPERTY! If You steal a hard copy of cubase they actually manufactured the discs, manuals, packaging, sold it to guitar center for a wholesale price for it to be sold to people. You're taking something that has actual monetary value.
Physical or not, property is property. Software DOES have actual monetary value, and when it's stolen, that's theft of service or theft of labor.

If you fixed my car by pulling dents, rotating the tires, brushing out the interior, etc.; all work which involved no parts replaced or installed, and then I just told you to fuck off, I'm not paying you the labor costs, there's no monetary value in what you did because you put nothing in the form of physical value into the car, you'd call me a thief.

If you were a speechwriter for a living and I took a copy of your speech that you were selling for some amount of money and used it to my advantage to make money and told you your speech was worthless because it was just words, just information, and therefore had no value, you'd call me a thief.

And when you call companies that you steal from regularly like Steinberg, Waves, Sonic Foundry and Cakewalk "big media companies", that's proof that you haven't the slightest idea of what you're talking about. They are a lot smaller, and have a lot bigger bills than you think. Your average local Wal*Mart store has more employees than your average software company. On top of that, the audio software company only sells a tiny product line to a fairly small market instead of thousands of products to the entire general public, and has an average employee salary of over $50K instead of a bunch of GEDs and retiries working for minimum wage plus. Add to that the fact that these companies only exist because their operating costs are paid for by seed money and loans (typically in the $10M - $30M range) from VCs and other financial institutions, and have to keep sales revenues going just to pay those loans and monthly bills.

BTW, I don't hear any of you conspiratorial anarchist slackers complaining that a UA or a Manley hardware box costs ten times more than an Alesis or a Behringer when the actual cost in physical materials are fairly the same. Why? there is only one reason why. Because the hardware is too hard to steal, so you accept the fact that if you want the good stuff that you gotta earn it.

Grow up, get a job, and work for a living. Only then will you ever come close to understanding the true definition of value and stop coming up with lame excuses and false religions for stealing toys that you want but don't really need and certainly can't afford.

G.
 
Last edited:
SouthSIDE Glen said:
Physical or not, property is property. Software DOES have actual monetary value, and when it's stolen, that's theft of service or theft of labor.

If you fixed my car by pulling dents, rotating the tires, brushing out the interior, etc.; all work which involved no parts replaced or installed, and then I just told you to fuck off, I'm not paying you the labor costs, there's no monetary value in what you did because you put nothing in the form of physical value into the car, you'd call me a thief.

If you were a speechwriter for a living and I took a copy of your speech that you were selling for some amount of money and used it to my advantage to make money and told you your speech was worthless because it was just words, just information, and therefore had no value, you'd call me a thief.

The thing is, while your comparisons are MUCH better than the usual stealing a car or ripping off gear at music stores comparison, you have to realize that you are still talking about someone doing one specific job per unit sold. They don't re-develop the software for every single disc printed. You know what I'm saying?

SouthSIDE Glen said:
And when you call companies that you steal from regularly like Steinberg, Waves, Sonic Foundry and Cakewalk "big media companies", that's proof that you haven't the slightest idea of what you're talking about. They are a lot smaller, and have a lot bigger bills than you think. Your average local Wal*Mart store has more employees than your average software company. On top of that, the audio software company only sells a tiny product line to a fairly small market instead of thousands of products to the entire general public, and has an average employee salary of over $50K instead of a bunch of GEDs and retiries working for minimum wage plus. Add to that the fact that these companies only exist because their operating costs are paid for by seed money and loans (typically in the $10M - $30M range) from VCs and other financial institutions, and have to keep sales revenues going just to pay those loans and monthly bills.

You don't really listen to what people say, do you? Never said that man. The only software company in cahoots with any media is probably Adobe that I know of, and even that from what I've seen is very distant. I've said over and over again to you that there's a big difference between software developers and big media, and I have a different set of ethics for each industry. You might have selective reading, not sure why you make the exact opposite connections to what I say. Also, I don't have any software from any of the companies you mentioned (I'm a mac guy) also man, I DO buy software. I have some software that is pirated, but my general mindset is as soon as I can afford it, I support the creator by purchasing it. There are a few pieces of software that I think are grossly overpriced and will probably never buy (such as the adobe creative suite...HOLY CRAP!), but hey if I ever have the means to drop that much money I'd buy it...great suite of software. I do have a good ethic with software as well as music. I support the creators of the software as much as I am able. Anyway, you're really reaching for stuff here Glen. Big media is big media, software companies are software companies. Never even alluded to there being a connection between the two.


SouthSIDE Glen said:
BTW, I don't hear any of you conspiratorial anarchist slackers complaining that a UA or a Manley hardware box costs ten times more than an Alesis or a Behringer when the actual cost in physical materials are fairly the same. Why? there is only one reason why. Because the hardware is too hard to steal, so you accept the fact that if you want the good stuff that you gotta earn it.

I often do. Music and audio gear is REDICULOUS! You know what? I almost never buy new gear (unless it's computer related). These companies charge an arm and a leg for their gear simply just because they can, and frankly that's wrong. So, that is my rebellion, as little as it really matters anyway, I buy used gear pretty much exclusively (why the hell not? People usually take care of their music gear better than their own children). MUCH cheaper, and I've never been burned on a piece of gear yet.

SouthSIDE Glen said:
Grow up, get a job, and work for a living. Only then will you ever come close to understanding the true definition of value and stop coming up with lame excuses and false religions for stealing toys that you want but don't really need and certainly can't afford.

And finally, again you ignore selectively things people say (no wonder you can know some of the facts of reality and deny it's truth). You obviously ignored my response to your first moronic pre-planned, pompous, and downright rude script you repeated on this subject. So much for your abstinance from chest pounding half-wit banter, that lasted a whole, what, three posts? I was just waiting for master Glen to tell me how it is (HA!). I just knew it, it's your charactor.

So, my response to you is: Fuck you for your condescending attitude. I work very hard for a living, and provide very well for my family, you dipshit. I am far more motivated than most people, for your information. I've lived a life that people like you could only imagine. Next time, instead of making yourself look like a dumbfuck who doesn't understand half of what people say to them, READ BEFORE YOU REPLY! You come accross as condescending because you are. You are not the center of the universe, and like almost everyone in the earth, myself included, you matter about as much as a silent fart coming out of a dogs ass. A humble attitude would do wonders for you. In short: Go fuck yourself, you rude, condescending, self-important, ego-centric prick.

Have a nice day.

oh and P.S. to the cowardly (see? I dun actually used du wurd currectly) little shit who keeps neg repping me for no fucking good reason. Grow a brain, and realize that if someone dissagrees with you, it's OOOO KAAAAY! That's how you get to a thinking level above a common monkey, discussing beliefs with everyone, people you dissagree with, as well as the like-minded. And while your at it, grow a set of balls and a dick you sniveling little worm, and sign your neg reps, instead of hiding.
 
Last edited:
TerraMortim said:
The thing is, while your comparisons are MUCH better than the usual stealing a car or ripping off gear at music stores comparison, you have to realize that you are still talking about someone doing one specific job per unit sold. They don't re-develop the software for every single disc printed. You know what I'm saying?
I had a big, long, itemized reply typed out, but it's just not worth it. You don't read my posts any better than you claim I read yours.

Yeah, my attitude changed. This stopped being an "intellectural discussion" the instant you and Pothead went off on your wild conspiratorial tangent and exposed yourselves and your true root motivations for defending piracy. It's not chest-beating on my part, it's calling a spade a spade to say that I don't waste my time condescending to paranoid anarchist slackers. You guys don't deserve the rights you abuse.

G.
 
SouthSIDE Glen said:
I had a big, long, itemized reply typed out, but it's just not worth it. You don't read my posts any better than you claim I read yours.

Yeah, my attitude changed. This stopped being an "intellectural discussion" the instant you and Pothead went off on your wild conspiratorial tangent and exposed yourselves and your true root motivations for defending piracy. It's not chest-beating on my part, it's calling a spade a spade to say that I don't waste my time condescending to paranoid anarchist slackers. You guys don't deserve the rights you abuse.

G.

I was gonna say, I realised I was flogging a dead horse with this thread a few weeks ago. Unfortunately nothing you or I or anyone else could say will change the way people are because they all think they are perfectly justified. So screw it I say. Better off putting energy into something else and let them all wallow in their own shit. ;)
 
legionserial said:
I was gonna say, I realised I was flogging a dead horse with this thread a few weeks ago. Unfortunately nothing you or I or anyone else could say will change the way people are because they all think they are perfectly justified. So screw it I say. Better off putting energy into something else and let them all wallow in their own shit. ;)
The only reason I even came back to this thread yesterday was because I'm too much of a gentleman to let Morningstar alone in the woods with those Robin Hoods ;).

Besides, legion, these posts are not my fault. I have been drinking flouridated tap water my whole life, so thanks to the CIA I am nothing but a mindless mouthpiece minion of the Tri-Lateral Commission now. :eek: :rolleyes: :D

G.
 
Last edited:
TerraMortim said:
The thing is, while your comparisons are MUCH better than the usual stealing a car or ripping off gear at music stores comparison, you have to realize that you are still talking about someone doing one specific job per unit sold. They don't re-develop the software for every single disc printed. You know what I'm saying?

That's the nature of the software business.

A band only records their CD once. So they should only be able to sell it once, right? And then they should re-record the whole thing (spending a lot of money, not even a fraction of what the software industry spends) before selling a 2nd one?

All of your arguments are weak.
 
SouthSIDE Glen said:
I had a big, long, itemized reply typed out, but it's just not worth it. You don't read my posts any better than you claim I read yours.

Yeah, my attitude changed. This stopped being an "intellectural discussion" the instant you and Pothead went off on your wild conspiratorial tangent and exposed yourselves and your true root motivations for defending piracy. It's not chest-beating on my part, it's calling a spade a spade to say that I don't waste my time condescending to paranoid anarchist slackers. You guys don't deserve the rights you abuse.

G.


THERE YOU GO AGAIN WITH YOUR POTHEAD SH*T! WTF YOU GOTTA GET PERSONAL, AND START WITH THE NAME CALLING? SLACKER? I'M WORKING 12 HOURS A DAY 6 DAYS A WEEK! I BUST MY ASS EVERY DAY! FAR FROM A SLACKER! THERE YOU GO JUDGING OTHERS AGAIN! SORRY I DECIDED NOT TO GET INTO IT WITH YOUR SORRY ASS, BUT I JUST DON'T HAVE TIME! ~I'm a slacker because I don't spend my whole day posting on forums? I don't deserve the rights I have, not because I steal (which I don't), but because I won't join you in bashing, and judging the ones that do? You know nothing about me.
BTW, Mr. Intellect, if you are going to use the word "intellectual", learn how to spell it. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
ACIDROCK, grow a set, and sign the neg feedback you leave next time.
 
Toker41 said:
THERE YOU GO AGAIN WITH YOUR POTHEAD SH*T! WTF YOU GOTTA GET PERSONAL, AND START WITH THE NAME CALLING? SLACKER? I'M WORKING 12 HOURS A DAY 6 DAYS A WEEK! I BUST MY ASS EVERY DAY! FAR FROM A SLACKER! THERE YOU GO JUDGING OTHERS AGAIN! SORRY I DECIDED NOT TO GET INTO IT WITH YOUR SORRY ASS, BUT I JUST DON'T HAVE TIME! ~I'm a slacker because I don't spend my whole day posting on forums? I don't deserve the rights I have, not because I steal (which I don't), but because I won't join you in bashing, and judging the ones that do? You know nothing about me.
BTW, Mr. Intellect, if you are going to use the word "intellectual", learn how to spell it. :rolleyes:
You'd better be careful, little one; my robed and hooded brothers at the Fed might find out about you. One phone call and you might be reverse IP traced and found by the NSA, kidnapped and drugged by the CIA, and forced to work as foot masseuse and back hair shaver for George Schultz - for no pay, BTW, yet forced to pay income and social security tax anyway - never to be seen or heard from again by your Lone Gunmen buddies who, by advocating software theft to others while simultaneously denying in public that they do it themselves, are the last bastion of freedom defending us from the evils of globalized capitalism.

G.
 
Last edited:
SouthSIDE Glen said:
You'd better be careful, little one; my robed and hooded brothers at the Fed might find out about you. One phone call and you might be reverse IP traced and found by the NSA, kidnapped and drugged by the CIA, and forced to work as foot masseuse and back hair shaver for George Schultz - for no pay, BTW, yet forced to pay income and social security tax anyway - never to be seen or heard from again by your Lone Gunmen buddies who, by advocating software theft to others while simultaneously denying in public that they do it themselves, are the last bastion of freedom defending us from the evils of globalized capitalism.

G.

I NEVER advocated software theft. I simply don't attack, or judge others that do it. There you go trying to feel better about yourself by judging others. Get off your soapbox, and get a life.
 
Toker41 said:
I NEVER advocated software theft.
You've spent this entire thread advocating it.

And as far as your 12/6 schedule goes, let's see... that's 72 hours a week. Let's be generous and say that you spend only an average of 6.5 hours a night sleeping. That's another 45.5 hours. Another 4 hours a day for eating, shit/shower/shaving, commuting, etc., adds another 28 hours to your weekly schedule. That adds up to a total of 146.5 hours a week you spend just working, sleeping and eating.

In a total of 168 hours a week, that leaves you only about three hours a day to spend living the rest of your life, including apparently becoming an expert at global politics and business management. Yet you still have time to waste in the "New Rep Point Thread" adding meaningless and useless rep points to your total (you've added another 3000 or so points just between your last post and this one; more than fine people like Tom V. have earned in several years here of actually meaningful and useful posting), and yet you bitch about all the negative rep you get because of the ludicrous posts you make here. And still you have time to, by your own words, sit "in the studio all day" because it's too cloudy out to mow the lawn.

My life is what it is, and it's out in the open. Everybody knows who I am and what my resume looks like. I don't remain anonymous, spend time collecting bullshit rep points, make up a fake life and bullshit about it to strangers on the Internet. Talk about going to bizarre lengths in a need to feel better about one's self. Look in the mirror, son.

Don't drink the flouridated water, Mulder; the Smoking Man could be knocking on your door at any time and you want to be alert.

G.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top