Behringer B5 mic

  • Thread starter Thread starter tcoma
  • Start date Start date
freshmattyp said:
DJL - You might want to put a link to the thread that this quote actually appears in, since it's completely unrelated to this discussion. In fact, you seem to be implying that you and Alan have buried the hatchet. Has that actually happened?
Yeah, I guess it is a little confusing, so here you go...

I originally said “ADDED... this is my way of saying lets move on and bury the hatchet, and start over... what do you say?” in this http://www.homerecording.com/bbs/sh...ge=25&highlight=bury the hatchet&pagenumber=7 thread... and Alan replied with “Well now, maybe we can use this one more time to bury the hatchet. I have asked you this three times since Stephen has passed.

Last time, how about letting it go and no more attacks on either side... So you know, I am not looking to Spam anything, so you don't need to think that.

You're Call!” in this http://www.homerecording.com/bbs/showthread.php?threadid=111225&perpage=25&pagenumber=2 thread, and I replied here in the thread your reading now.

So anyway, yeah I think we buried the hatchet already and if Alan is really here to help us all, it would be nice if he would start by posting some pictures of inside the C4 for us.
 
I'm curious as to why you didn't post your reply in that particular thread. Not that I'm expecting anything like a straight answer from you.

If you're so dang curious about the C4's, buy a pair from somebody with a return policy and photograph to your little heart's content. Why is it that I suspect you want the pics to come from SP so you can validate your latest crackpot theory that the B5 is really a C4, and all SP did was buy an OEM mic off the shelf from 797. Is that close?

You seem to be the only person dying for these pictures.
 
freshmattyp, I don't think I'm the only one who would like to know how much difference there really is between the B5 and C4, and even if I am the only one... I'd still like to know. However, if your not interested that's ok with me... but then I really think it would be best if you'd just butt-out and quit trying make something out of nothing.

So Alan, did we bury the hatchet... and if so, how about helping me and others out and posting some close up pictures of inside the C4.

PS... please post the close up pictures of the C4 that is currently being sold. But if you'd like to post pictures of the mods that Brent has added to the C4, that would be nice too... you know, maybe the people who already own C4's would like to add the mods to their C4's. Maybe the same mods could be added to the B5 also?

It's nice to know your back on this mic forum just to help us and not to spam us. Thanks again.
 
Last edited:
I recall waaayyy back (possibly well before they were released), it being said that Brent Casey was working on the design of the C4 mics. That, coupled with the fact that the C4's were to my knowledge, in the market place before the Behri B5's should dispel any questions regarding who copied who. Behri already had their LD mics available and common sense says that they would have been on the lookout for a SD mic to release. The C4 concept, with it's additional capsule was a prime candidate for Behri's poaching habits and it's a fair bet that considerable dollars (or Chinese yen or whatever) were paid to 797 to get them to produce the B5 in the time frame involved. It is quite possible that Behri had inside info from someone at 797 and that they new all about the C4's long before we ever saw them.

DJ, if you are so desperate to see the inside of these mics, why don't you just email Alan and ask instead of repeatedly posting it here. Personally I don't think it's that big a deal, I almost know what I would see if the C4 and B5 were opened up.

:cool:
 
ausrock said:
I recall waaayyy back (possibly well before they were released), it being said that Brent Casey was working on the design of the C4 mics. That, coupled with the fact that the C4's were to my knowledge, in the market place before the Behri B5's should dispel any questions regarding who copied who. <snip>
I rememeber that too.
ausrock said:
DJ, if you are so desperate to see the inside of these mics, why don't you just email Alan and ask instead of repeatedly posting it here. <snip>
If Alan is really on this mic forum just to help, he'll post the C4 pictures... and if he's not here to help, he won't post the pictures... it's as simple as that.
 
DJL said:
If Alan is really on this mic forum just to help, he'll post the C4 pictures... and if he's not here to help, he won't post the pictures... it's as simple as that.
Hmmm... you must must be a republican. :)
 
This is threatening to become Groundhog Day.

Whether or not Alan chooses or is able to post pics of any sort has no bearing on the level of help he wishes to or is able to give here and throwing down the gauntlet at him with a post bordering on the confrontational won't help.

:cool:
 
How about someone just do a comparison on the C4 & B5
by listening which is what really counts anyway.
I own a B5 but not a C4 and it really don't look like I could take it apart without breaking it without special tools.
I don't have all the experience that some of you guys do but I can tell you that the B5 self noise seems to be less than my SP C1
( I'm happy with both mics )
 
DJL said:
If Alan is really on this mic forum just to help, he'll post the C4 pictures... and if he's not here to help, he won't post the pictures... it's as simple as that.

Jesus, I thought we finally killed this thread yesterday. Apparently you all are not aware of my reputation as a serial thread killer.

DJL, your reasoning defies logic. At this point, I doubt Alan is even still reading this thread. Give it a rest, it's not gonna happen. You're doing the rain man thing again.
 
freshmattyp said:
Jesus, I thought we finally killed this thread yesterday. Apparently you all are not aware of my reputation as a serial thread killer.

DJL, your reasoning defies logic. At this point, I doubt Alan is even still reading this thread. Give it a rest, it's not gonna happen. You're doing the rain man thing again.
He's right DJL. If you wanna see the insides, this certainally isn't the way to go about it.
 
Flatpicker said:
He's right DJL. If you wanna see the insides, this certainally isn't the way to go about it.
I agree, and I already gave up on Alan posting the C4 pictures here on the mic forum.
 
Phylbee said:
How about someone just do a comparison on the C4 & B5
by listening which is what really counts anyway.
I own a B5 but not a C4 and it really don't look like I could take it apart without breaking it without special tools.
I don't have all the experience that some of you guys do but I can tell you that the B5 self noise seems to be less than my SP C1
( I'm happy with both mics )
797 Audio in China makes both the Behringer B5 and Studio Projects C4 mics, and my gut feeling is the B5 and C4 may be closer to each other than some would like to admit.
 
freshmattyp,

I have a feeling 797 Audio in China ripped off PMI (Brent Casey) for the C4 mic design and sold them to Behringer for their B5... that's where I'm headed with this, besides just wanting to know how close the B5 and C4 really are to each other. I have a feeling this kind of business pratice happens all the time to distributors, mic companies, and etc when dealing with the Chinese factories.
 
Funny, I thought I proposed that same theory earlier. :D

The following is a comment by someone who saw the mics close up, I believe at the Summer NAMM. For my part he shall remain nameless unless he chooses otherwise and I hope he doesn't mind my quoting his comments from another BBS. BTW, it wasn't Alan Hyatt!!!........................"The grille is completely different, and the frequency response plot is way different for the cardioid head. The altered frequency response is in the high-end with the C4 having two +2dB bumps around 8.5K and 11K and the C5 having a broad +3-4dB hump centered at 15K. Whether this is due to the capsule or the electronics is anybody’s guess (I bet Behringer knows ),.......................".

Behringer have shown too many times that they have no conscience when it comes to copying others' designs and when they do, they almost inevitably undercut the copied product to ridiculous levels.

:cool:
 
ausrock,

I think I read something similar somewhere... maybe I read the same thread, I don't know. Anyway, without looking at the insides of the B5 and C4 (side-by-side) your guess is as good as anyones. Were you ever able to find any other mics that look like the Behringer B5 and Studio Projects C4 mics that were also made by 797 Audio in China?
 
ausrock said:
...The following is a comment by someone who saw the mics close up, I believe at the Summer NAMM. For my part he shall remain nameless unless he chooses otherwise and I hope he doesn't mind my quoting his comments from another BBS...
I confess – it was me. Actually, I was the one who told Alan about the B5.

I was at Summer NAMM and had already chatted with Alan, Justin and Brent, (great folks, btw) and strolled over by the B’ger booth where I noticed the B5. Of course I knew right off they’d copied the C4, so I grabbed a brochure and took it back to Alan. Thinking he already knew about it, I jokingly made reference to it as “B’ger’s C4”. He was kind of like… “Huh???” That’s when it hit me that he didn’t know.

I really felt bad for those guys because I knew they’d been working on it a long time. Heck, I’d even seen a proto of the C4 there the year before. Coming from an engineering/manufacturing background, I know the dis-heartening feeling when years of work is copied by others and they freely profit from your design, so I sympathized greatly.

Alan had a very good attitude about it, though. I’d have been rip-roaring mad, but he just shrugged it off and said something like “Oh well, stuff like that happens sometimes.”

Funny thing was, Brent and Justin made a bee-line over to the B’ger booth (with me following) where Brent just reached up, grabbed the B5 off it’s display, screwed off the capsule and started looking it over right in front of the B’ger guys. They just stood around whispering to each other - probably plotting an escape route in case Brent and Justin started kicking their butts! :D After we looked it over, Brent screwed the capsule back on and we just walked away. Those B’ger guys never said a word to us.

Brent was quick to point out that the B5’s inferior capsule grille would hurt the high end, which tells you B’ger must have been forced to change the design (probably by 797 for fear loosing of SP’s business) by some degree. In other words, I see no other motive for intentionally making an inferior “copy”. Later I looked up the frequency plot graphs of the two mics and they were as described in ausrock’s post.

Anyway, ever since that day I’ve wondered about the possible similarities. Alan was nice enough to jump into this thread and inform us of the situation (something other company owners rarely do). Alan said that 797 told him they were different, he believes 797, and I believe him. And to me, it’s kind of uplifting to think that maybe there is some justice to the situation since B’ger didn’t get away with copying them completely. The B5 is probably a Nady (also from 797, I believe) with interchangeable capsules and switches. It for sure has the same grille!

Bottom line: you can not get a new “C4” for $79. After all, that’s what this was all about, wasn’t it?
 
<Those look like MXL 603s.>

They come with three capsules. The size and body style is different. I zoomed their graph on Photoshop--look the same as 603 on mid and HF, with "nice" as they call "presence" peak of 6db on 9-10 Khz, but actually, this peak is a result of poor damping. The LF look little different, probably because of different back chamber construction, and different proximity effect. Oh yeah, the 603 is a subcardioid.
 
Back
Top