Well I think your interface is fine for what you're doing now. Are you using the presets on the amp or the Pod farm stuff? The lead sounds ok sort of a Santana PRS flavor. It's a little loud in the mix for me but overall I think the track is pretty darn good for 15 yo.
well that shows you have good judgement and ears right there. You'll do well.No, I can't stand the old pod farm tones. Just been working with Mic-ing mostly.
About the grammar, fair enough.
I will now read that article and then comment, thanks!
I'll just continue tuning to 440 and continue to sound better than the "free thinkers" trying to complicate things that are actually very simple.
But is it complicated though? I challenge you to find out two frequencies that when are mathematically doubled cause modulation noise using a multitone sine wave generator. Try to find a frequency that when is mathematically doubled will cause the combination to sound out of tune. Say for instance 200Hz and 400Hz, or 150Hz and 300Hz. What I'm challenging you with is this thought: If you can find a mathematical relationship between 2 tones in a musical scale (across the whole frequency spectrum) that always causes full resonance, why would you not be able to find similar mathematical relationships when determining the frequencies for the rest of the tones in the scale, why would it exist between two frequencies but not between all the rest? Because after all you HAVE been able to prove a mathematical relationship between notes in the frequency doubling case, it could have been different, but nature says it's not. Please think about this...
In a completely chaotic creation, you could never repeat anything, when you would try out 200Hz against 400Hz they would randomly be out of tune. But they are simply not. One can repeat that test an infinite amount of times, but the truth of nature is a constant, it always returns the same output. And it is this: Total unconditional love.
So why are you saying 440 tuning is "not in tune" but 432 is?
But is it complicated though? I challenge you to find out two frequencies that when are mathematically doubled cause modulation noise using a multitone sine wave generator. Try to find a frequency that when is mathematically doubled will cause the combination to sound out of tune. Say for instance 200Hz and 400Hz, or 150Hz and 300Hz. What I'm challenging you with is this thought: If you can find a mathematical relationship between 2 tones in a musical scale (across the whole frequency spectrum) that always causes full resonance, why would you not be able to find similar mathematical relationships when determining the frequencies for the rest of the tones in the scale, why would it exist between two frequencies but not between all the rest? Because after all you HAVE been able to prove a mathematical relationship between notes in the frequency doubling case, it could have been different, but nature says it's not. Please think about this...
In a completely chaotic creation, you could never repeat anything, when you would try out 200Hz against 400Hz they would randomly be out of tune. But they are simply not. One can repeat that test an infinite amount of times, but the truth of nature is a constant, it always returns the same output. And it is this: Total unconditional love.
So why are you saying 440 tuning is "not in tune" but 432 is?
What are you babbling about this time?
---------- Update ----------
He doesn't know what he is saying.
Hey chili, why is musicwater allowed to derail a thread with this nonsense?
Derailing a thread is a bannable offense, right?He shouldn't be...
I am way past being tired of it myself...
There needs to be a maximum number of ridiculous posts when infraction and ban becomes something we can do. I am sick of the stupid shit around here lately.
But is it complicated though? I challenge you to find out two frequencies that when are mathematically doubled cause modulation noise using a multitone sine wave generator. Try to find a frequency that when is mathematically doubled will cause the combination to sound out of tune. Say for instance 200Hz and 400Hz, or 150Hz and 300Hz. What I'm challenging you with is this thought: If you can find a mathematical relationship between 2 tones in a musical scale (across the whole frequency spectrum) that always causes full resonance, why would you not be able to find similar mathematical relationships when determining the frequencies for the rest of the tones in the scale, why would it exist between two frequencies but not between all the rest? Because after all you HAVE been able to prove a mathematical relationship between notes in the frequency doubling case, it could have been different, but nature says it's not. Please think about this...
In a completely chaotic creation, you could never repeat anything, when you would try out 200Hz against 400Hz they would randomly be out of tune. But they are simply not. One can repeat that test an infinite amount of times, but the truth of nature is a constant, it always returns the same output. And it is this: Total unconditional love.
An octave is an octave, no matter whether you start at 440 or 432...
Yeah....that's the part he either doesn't get, or is intentionally dodging.
I mean...nothing wrong with doing 432 or whatever else you prefer. The A= reference has been all over the place in the last few hundred years, with various frequencies being used, depending on prersonal preferences and music politics on the classical concert side of things.
Just don't sell 432 as some special/magical reference that somehow fixes all the 12 step octave tuning issues...432 doesn't change the intervals of the 12 step octave.
So why are you saying 440 tuning is "not in tune" but 432 is?
WTF does that ^^^ have anything to do with the A=432Hz VS A=440Hz discussion....???