34B hi freq loss on record

  • Thread starter Thread starter evm1024
  • Start date Start date
All buffed up

Dr ZEE said:
me waiting for the show :D pls

Here are some photos of the heads buffed up and the tool used. I still need to do a full recalibration but as it stands it now is -3 db at 20kHz. Not bad.

Long as I had it apart I replaced the 4558/4559 opamps with OPA2132. I also noticed that it would be easy to switch it over to IEC-1 eq if one wanted.

I'll post a full response curve when I get a chance to cal it up again. Work has me tied up for the next week or so. Time will be short.

--Ethan

PS I suspect that a few hours tape motion will add to the polish....
 

Attachments

  • head1.webp
    head1.webp
    8.9 KB · Views: 40
  • head2.webp
    head2.webp
    10.4 KB · Views: 40
  • head3.webp
    head3.webp
    13.2 KB · Views: 44
  • dermel.webp
    dermel.webp
    9.8 KB · Views: 42
SteveMac said:
Jeez, the price. :eek:

The prices at USR are a bit high, but they were among the highest when they sold Quantegy tape, before and after the tape scare.

I look for prices to come down as more vendors pick up the RMGI line. It was just a few years ago that most tape houses gave us the choice of Quantegy or EMTEC. Hopefully they will all stock both again.

RMGI is way behind predictions... they are just now barely rolling out 1/2" tape and wider. The place we’re in right now is “so close but yet so far away.” Still some more waiting to go before we’re settled in. :)
 
Ethan,
I was just confused reading your initial post that you actually had the answer to the problem right in your hand and nobody really needed to tell you anything more.
Re photos of heads, they really need to be much more magnified to be of any use for diagnosis. The working faces of tape heads need to be viewed at least with some kind of magnifying lupe. I mean when looking at them with your eye. The most important area is the part where the tape actually touches the head, ie: the small area around the gap.
I seem to have spent much of the last 20 years staring at tape head faces through magnifying lupes, both before and after relapping. Since I'm not a youngster any more I need more magnification than I used to but even so, some sort of magnification (close up lens) would be necessary even for the younger folk.
Sometimes sticky shed muck can be very hard to remove and, if left on there for a long time, can corrode the surface because it seems to hold moisture.
Sometimes the head needs relapping because of this even though it's not worn in a mechanical sense.
You're right that recording tape itself can do an excellent final job of polishing the head face to perfection.
With good reel machines running at say 15ips it should be dead easy to get flat 20hz to 20khz specs. (In my area of high speed cassette duplication, running cassettes at 15ips, the aim is to get it flat to 80khz!) There should be no need to crank up play or record eq. If you are having to set trim pots anywhere near their extremes there is something amiss and checking the heads themselves is always a good place to start.
Best wishes, Tim
 
Couple questions about this

I have a couple questions

Is it always safe to buffer the heads?
Are all heads supposed to be "mirror like"?
What exactly is "the gap"
 
SteveMac said:
I have a couple questions

Is it always safe to buffer the heads?
Are all heads supposed to be "mirror like"?
What exactly is "the gap"

Steve, d-load THIS .pdf , there page 6/chapter II. (note: that's page 15 of the pdf file)
 

Attachments

  • gap.webp
    gap.webp
    3.6 KB · Views: 51
Last edited:
Well, I tried downloading it but this computer just doesn't have the wherewithall for a file that large I guess. Think I need a new computer.

EDIT: I did get to that page. Pretty interesting. I'll have to find a way to download that somehow.
 
Last edited:
I'll try to attach .gif pages...
 

Attachments

  • magnetic_head_01.webp
    magnetic_head_01.webp
    71.9 KB · Views: 32
  • magnetic_head_02.webp
    magnetic_head_02.webp
    32.7 KB · Views: 36
  • magnetic_head_03.webp
    magnetic_head_03.webp
    97.4 KB · Views: 31
  • magnetic_head_04.webp
    magnetic_head_04.webp
    85.2 KB · Views: 30
  • magnetic_head_05.webp
    magnetic_head_05.webp
    34.4 KB · Views: 30
two more pages
 

Attachments

  • magnetic_head_06.webp
    magnetic_head_06.webp
    94.3 KB · Views: 35
  • magnetic_head_07.webp
    magnetic_head_07.webp
    29.8 KB · Views: 27
Steve, it's kind of pain in the neck reading large pdf files if the file is not on your computer but on the server... well, it's still possible.
anyhow, ... this document contains some interesting information and illustrations as well... not all related to audio recording... but I'd say it does not hurt to have some general idea about all that stuff .. if you've got time to waste , of course :D
 
Dr ZEE said:
Steve, it's kind of pain in the neck reading large pdf files if the file is not on your computer but on the server... well, it's still possible.
Well it was a little on the chunky side. It might have been an idea to have given the file size. Now the B67 service manual is just evil. I'd never seen a 225MB PDF file before.
 
Back
Top