bouldersoundguy
Well-known member
you need to copy the track, and shift the second track 15-20ms. This will make it sound thick and full. Also will give you contrast left to right.
Never do this.
you need to copy the track, and shift the second track 15-20ms. This will make it sound thick and full. Also will give you contrast left to right.
Never do this.
Thank you. I second that vehemently.
Third. I've heard of doing this with double-tracking rhythm guitars, that doesn't seem too bad.
REAL bad idea. This is just a comb filter generator.you need to copy the track, and shift the second track 15-20ms. This will make it sound thick and full. Also will give you contrast left to right.
Ah, yeah I heard of it sort of like "You can do it, but it's not the best route" sort of way. Just to give it a stereo feel, where you have one track hard left and the one that's just a few milliseconds off hard right. I haven't recorded any rock/metal music in a while, but I usually just play it twice as tight as possible.No, even for guitars recording the same part twice by actually playing it twice is generally the best way to go. Duplicating tracks doesn't accomplish any good.
Ah, thanks. That looks really useful. I'm going to look into it.Here's a great tool(beside your ears) to make sure you are not over doing the master limiter. TT Dynamic Range Meter - Fight the Loudness War
you need to copy the track, and shift the second track 15-20ms. This will make it sound thick and full. Also will give you contrast left to right.
I guess no one likes my idea. I have found it to work great on my recordings. I can understand if you have money to invest in nice plug-ins but I have about 100$ in my studio. Here is my youtube channel. You can hear the effect on the guitars and I think it sounds fine. I even used it on the little solo in the middlde of the song.
Impossible.wmv - YouTube
solo is at 2:12
I made a video on this topic, but I can't post it here because I haven't made ten posts yet. Google for the title and you'll find it:
How to master a song loud - and, the price you pay
Or, maybe someone helpful could post the actual link for me ?
Ian
[Heads off to look for other threads to post in and increase his post count]
Quite the opposite. Unless you really meant they only "sound" louder, then I'd agree possibly. But, in actuality, modern recordings are WAAAAYYYY louder than any Who recording.The who recordings sound SO much more loud than modern music.
Quite the opposite. Unless you really meant they only "sound" louder, then I'd agree possibly. But, in actuality, modern recordings are WAAAAYYYY louder than any Who recording.
Yes, that's all I'm referring to. I thought I made that abundantly clear. Relax. Nobody's disagreeing with you.Technically, the modern stuff may MEASURE louder and I believe this is what you're referring to..