Who Is Better Jimi Hendrix or Jimmy Page

  • Thread starter Thread starter jrhoden
  • Start date Start date

who is better Jimi Hendrix or Jimmy Page

  • Jimi Hendrix

    Votes: 62 28.3%
  • Jimmy Page

    Votes: 35 16.0%
  • they both kick ass

    Votes: 64 29.2%
  • who cares

    Votes: 58 26.5%

  • Total voters
    219
I read in a guitar magazine in the early 80's that Hendrix did not create the backwards guitar thing (lead guitar playing backwards in song)

I didnt get my info off the internet

Im sticking with what I said...call me full of crap all you want.

Unless the article was misinformed im sticking with what I read.
He probably didn't "create" it. I think the Beatles did it first, though I'm not sure of the chronology. But even if it wasn't his invention, that doesn't make him a better or worse guitar player. As was mentioned before, Jimi was his own engineer in the studio, for some of his greatest work. So, it's not as if we're talking about some average guitar player who only sounded better because of studio tricks. Jimi was awesome just playing straight blues without any "effects".

Led Zeppelin didn't invent reverb. But it doesn't make Jimmy Page less of a great producer for using it so inovatively.
 
I agree

Like I mentioned in a later post...both guitar players are legends and created some classic riffs that a lot of guitar players tried to emulate at some point in time.

As for the live stuff...I dont really care for Page or Hendrix live stuff however for the most part both of them were usually stoned out of their tree.

The studio work speaks for itsself and is great though.

Ive been watching old zep videos from their site.

This video is probably the best live stuff they have

Harmonica sounds awesome

The rest of the videos are not that great fro me.

http://www.ledzeppelin.com/video/nobodys-fault-mine-knebworth-1979#comment-5804

I posted about Roberts harmonica playing.

:cool:
 
Live Hendrix isnt that great...studio work sounds great but you have to give credit to the guys mxing it as well because he didnt sound like that live.

...whereas, I've heard some STAGGERINGLY good live (and live-in-the-studio) Jimi, and some awful live Page. Both guys had on and off nights, and I'm not going to get into the debate here (I have my preferences, but they're just that - preferences), but that it's at least worth mention that I know a LOT more people who considered Page a "sloppy live player" than I do Jimi. Granted, I think Page's reputation for sloppiness is overrated (and part of it was probably intentional - by the end, he realized no one actually gave a fuck how cleanly he played, they just wanted to see this larger than life rock god with a guitar slung to his knees), but all the same you're one of the few guys I've ever heard claim Page was more consistent live than Jimi.
 
I like them both. Both guys had soul. Both guys were innovative. Both guys were great song writers. Both guys had good tone.

Impossible for me to pick betwen the two.
 
War heroes

Most guitarists havent really heard Hendrix best guitar stuff. If you've ever heard the mostly Instrumental Album War Heroes, I think anyone would pick Hendrix. Too this day I dont believe anyone has taken electric guitar that far.
 
Most guitarists havent really heard Hendrix best guitar stuff. If you've ever heard the mostly Instrumental Album War Heroes, I think anyone would pick Hendrix. Too this day I dont believe anyone has taken electric guitar that far.

Yes, "War Heroes" is awesome. But, a lot of the guitars on that are played by some guy named Jeff Mironov, or something.
 
While I agree that his post was full of shit and totally un-informed, I have to point out that he wasn't talking about Jimi playing a right-handed guitar backwards. He was refering to the reversed recordings (backwards) like on "Are You Experienced?".

----------------------------------------------------------------

While there are some recordings of Hendrix live where he's a bit sloppy, there are also hours and hours of great live Hendrix. One needs to listen to someone for more than 3 minutes before they think they can make a judgement on how good or bad they are.

Oh Ok I get it now but still it was all jimmy for the most part. he did most of the Mixing dubbing and editing of his music He was quite a genus in that aspect as well that not many know about.
 
Jeff Mirinov did not play on War heroes. He played a few rythem tracks on "Crash Landing":p
 
You never heard Jimi play acoustic, have you???:rolleyes:
I saw this programme on the South bank show about 15 years ago about Jimi and at the very end as the credits were running, they played a clip of him playing the acoustic. It was pretty mesmerizing but that may have been because, until the clip Rami posted, I'd never seen him play acoustic.

I read in a guitar magazine in the early 80's that Hendrix did not create the backwards guitar thing (lead guitar playing backwards in song)

I didnt get my info off the internet
He probably didn't "create" it. I think the Beatles did it first, though I'm not sure of the chronology.
There had been a novelty song with backwards recording prior to 1966 but in rock, the first constructive and deliberate use of it is the lead guitar in the Beatles' "I'm only sleeping". This might surprize people who would cite "Rain" and "Tomorrow never knows" but "Rain came about by accident (depending on who you believe it was either John Lennon putting the tape on the wrong way round or George Martin in the experimental climate of 'Revolver' thinking it was a good idea on "Rain) and "Tomorrow never knows" has Paul McCartney's "Taxman" solo cut up and spun in backwards. But "I'm only sleeping" was the first time they actually consciously put it in as part of the song.
After the effect, for a couple of years, backwards recordings in songs were relatively common. Hendrix, like many of his ilk, seized upon the prevailing ideas of the times and put his own inventive spin on it.
As was mentioned before, Jimi was his own engineer in the studio, for some of his greatest work. So, it's not as if we're talking about some average guitar player who only sounded better because of studio tricks.
To be honest, I don't think any of the mid to late 60s groups were made to sound good by studio jiggery pokery. The songs and performances were there. The studio gadgetry were good enhancers. And a number of artists at the time were interested in sonics and pushed those boundaries. Hendrix was one of them. He had a studio built though he didn't record much there before he died.
Jimi was awesome just playing straight blues without any "effects".
One of the first things I ever read about Hendrix came from Alexis Korner. He said "He was the personification of black music.....Hendrix had this horrible feeling that he wasn't playing the blues. Such an idea coming from someone that was able to play the blues as well as he could I found very strange. The trouble was that he didn't play it in the watered down form which had come to be accepted as the blues. Amazingly, he felt guilty because he was playing it perfectly". Phew ! :eek:
Led Zeppelin didn't invent reverb. But it doesn't make Jimmy Page less of a great producer for using it so inovatively.
Jimmy Page was once asked what innovations he had come up with, if any, on "Led Zeppelin" and he said he pioneered the use of backwards echo on songs like "You shook me". It was noticing him always listed as producer on the Led Zeppelin Lps that first tweaked my desire to get involved in the engineering/production side of music as well as the playing and writing bit.
 
It's been an interesting thread. I think a better question would have been "Which do you prefer and why ?" rather than who is better. There'd be just as much debate.
I think Hendrix was an amazing guitar player but I still think he's over-rated. What I mean by that is this; nearly every time his name comes up, it's as the pinnacle of guitar playing as if everything before was just twaddle waiting for him to come along and nothing since can possibly hope to attain his heights. But this simply refuses to take into account the climate in which he appeared. Guitar had taken over from the piano and saxophone as the dominant rock'n'roll instrument and many excellent players were around or emerging. Some never fulfilled their potential, many did. And so many of them contributed to the evolution of rock guitar. Hendrix wasn't unimportant or a bit part player, on the contrary, and no doubt, he opened doors. He was one shining jewel in a star studded crown.
It's ironic. For all his performances for which he is lionized, he himself hated the live showmanship and wanted to expand his musicality because what he did depressed him. He was going to record with jazz legends Gil Evans and Miles Davies and was going to see what he could do with Greg Lake and Keith Emmerson after they'd left the Nice and King Crimson. But he died before anything came to fruition.
 
It's a hard question to ask, because they were oth great with what they did, Jimi had an original sound, while Jimmy also had his own sound. You're comparing two styles of music that aren't really compareable
 
I love what Jimmy Page did with Led Zeppelin in the studio though I've never been enamoured of his live sound. I respect the whole band live though - they were obsessed with giving value for money and putting on three hour gigs with different sections like the acoustic slot is something you rarely hear them praised for. For that alone they deserved their riches.
I think Page was fantastic {I use that word alot ! :D} on both electric and acoustic and was a more than handy producer and songwriter. Because he had been an in demand session man from 1964 {played on stuff by the Stones, the Kinks, the Who, Dusty Springfield, Donovan, Tom Jones and 100s of hits.....} he possessed as a guitar player and songwriter one of the most priceless commodities - pop sensibility. Whatever you want to say about Led Zeppelin, their music was accessible and hummable as well as being heavy, folksy, bluesy and kind of versatile.
It's hard to believe his first major band gig was as the Yardbirds' bass player !
He was also, unlike Hendrix, bloody ruthless in business.
 
I think there is a certain level that a band and/or artist reaches in which there is no better or worse. They reach a level in which their emotions truly are carried out through their music. For me, I've recorded about twenty songs at home, and the truth is that I only enjoy listening to three of them and maybe am fond of a couple others. Most I can't stand to hear, which means they stink.

I'm not trying to compare myself to those guys. Quite the opposite. I'll never reach that level, and don't really have ambition to reach that level.

I believe it's called Self-Actualization. A guy named Maslow came up with the idea. It's basically a state of satisfaction with one's own life when all goals are met, and they could die happy (something like that). Inner peace.

While Hendrix and Paige may or may not have reached that in their personal lives, it would be safe to say they did in their music.

This weekend I saw the B-52s live. I always liked their music, but it didn't blow me away like Zepplin.

And then I saw them live. Most acts try to be as good on stage as they are in the studio. These guys and girls were so much better live than their recordings would have you believe. I was blown away, and the youngest one is fifty-six.

I've seen a lot of bands live, and few have the work ethic that the B-52s showed the other night. They never went more than a couple seconds between songs (they didn't feel the need to blab on about political causes, etc.). Their longest break was when they took thirty seconds to introduce each other. They had the entire place on their feet dancing. My wife and I danced the entire time and were within about twenty feet of them. You could see their eyeballs crystal clear, and they were working really hard.

Their musicianship was outstanding, particularly the drummer and Keith Strickland, the guitar player (former drummer before Ricky Williams died).

They were tight and loose, all that the same time.

Few reach that level.

I never saw Hendrix live, but I heard his live recordings. He ripped live.

What I'm getting at is that Hendrix and Paige were both at the top.
 
I prefer Hendrix because I like him more as a character, not based on their actual playing styles, which I love both.
 
Back
Top