Which software you use to make audio recording

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gabriel Sousa
  • Start date Start date

Which software you use to make audio recording

  • Pro Tools

    Votes: 295 13.2%

  • Samplitude 24/96

    Votes: 68 3.0%

  • Cubase VST/32

    Votes: 436 19.5%

  • Nuendo

    Votes: 135 6.0%

  • Cakewalk Pro Audio

    Votes: 222 9.9%

  • Cool Edit Pro

    Votes: 411 18.4%

  • Vegas Audio

    Votes: 97 4.3%

  • n-track

    Votes: 151 6.8%

  • Sonar 1.0

    Votes: 226 10.1%

  • Logic audio

    Votes: 191 8.6%
  • Total voters
    2,232
Status
Not open for further replies.
Zip.. Can I send you an email with some of my thoughts also....

You see, I've been having these dreams about sheep.......Well I'll tell you the rest in the email...
 
Vox....

LOL

You kill me man... :)

I was just getting ready to send you an eMail so you could check it out...

Heck - it's free... :D

The thought of a "Neve" EQ parameter has my mouth watering...

lata gata...

zipster >>
 
Cakewalk to track and and effects, Sound Forge next. I also use Samplitude 'cause my Cakewalk has issues making MP3s!!!
 
I use Cool Edit Pro. Tracking, Editing, (easiest to use editor there is) and mixing. It doesn't have Midi, but then a real musician doesn't use Midi anyway. A five year old can be recording in a matter of minutes with this software. It has a great variety of effects, eq's, compressors, etc. Everything you need. And for $400.00 you can't beat it. Plus all the upgrades are free.
 
my 2 whole cents (canadian)

I've been trying out a lot of different demos as far as recordin stuff is concerend...and so far I'd have to say n(small n)-track is going to get my cash...most likely fruity loops as well...reason...ease of use...and multi functionality...also the user manual with the n- track extremely informative...if I could only get to figure out triplets in fruity loops...as far as wave editor still out on that one...lookin at cool edit tho
 
whats that american?

just to let you know...I bought cubasis awhile ago...thinkin I shoulda bought beer instead...my friend runs a mac and i noticeed it took awhile for him to get it up to snuff...and ya cuabse.net is full of ANGRY people lol...
 
I find it rather odd that cakewalk is winning this pole...........or maybe it's just been that long since I checked it out
 
Cubase!
VST 32
I have tried logic, and used cakewalk.
Cubase is simply the best. has great routing heaps of effects and gates, compressors etc. It works fine. Cakewalk is good but cubse has do many more features (mainly routing and effects).

I just have a cheap Sound Blaster Live! Platinum and I run the hacked APS (audio production studio) drivers and get 8ms latency with asio! all works great in cubase
 
Nuendo 1.53 wit Layla 20 - for tracking and mixing

Wave Lab - for editing....


Nuendo is really all you need and it is very easy to learn... If u can use Cubase you can use this.....\

It also does video and Midi...

Raticus

http://mp3.com/chopshop
 
i added Sx in here.. but we still use nuendo...

pro tools is built around its hardware..other than that there isn't any special about pro tools...most programs out can do everything it does and more...

Nuendo 1.53 with delta 1010 and SX 1.02- for Tracking and mixing
Wavelab 4-Editing-mastering
Sx-Tracking,mixing,Mastering
 
anyone have opinions on cubase sx yet?

i heard when it was first released that it did'n't have a very good display view...etc.

what I really think I want to get into is gigasampler....err...i guess it's gigstudio now?

that's basically for soft-synth type work right?
 
Its seems that there is a mix of success and failure with nearly all of the softwares mentioned. On my machine I have old CW 4.1, Logic Audio 4.7, N-Track and PT free for tracking options. For editing I have Sound Forge 4.5 through 5.0 xp. I also have GigaStudio and Acid 3.0, soon to obtain a real copy of fruity loops since Im auditioning Fruity loops Pro demo. I have success and failures with each different one depending on how many gremlins are loose. I like how each one seems to do things a little differerntly. There is no one answer to the question. Use whatever gives you the greatest number of success' within the interface you like and the budget ya got. Right now N-Track is not allowing me to record 16 bit, its hung up on 24bit, PT free lock me up and logic isn't liking my motherboard (Dell)usional ilks.

SoMm
 
Sonar 2 XL for tracking and mixing...
SoundForge 5.0 for editing...

A winning combination! IMHO...;)
 
-I use Cakewalk Home Studio 2002. I upgraded from a free version of Express Gold 8 that came with a SBLive, that I still use. I had no experience with any other software previous to that, CHS just looked similar to the free software I (kindof) already knew how to use, and it cost considerably less than the couple others people online mentioned.
-CHS has done odd things now and then, but most programs do.
-CHS does everything I need, recording and mixing-wise. I have a couple free .wav editors if I need them. I see people say how such-and-such software is pro and so much better, but I listen to their recordings, and for the most part I can't hear much of any difference.
 
I've been using SAW Software Audio Workshop for five years now. I've tried Vegas and other but none have the stability I've found with SAW. Working on a Assembly language engine, it's quick and clean. Unfortunately, Bob Lentil gave up the company and no longer produces SAW.

At it's last incarnation, 2.8 it had most features accept WDM driver support, therefore 16-bit resolution is as high as SAW will go under Windows XP. I will stick with this product as long as I can under Windows ME.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top