What's your favorite vocal mic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Han
  • Start date Start date
Yes, of course you are right! The difference is obvious because the 2nd one has a Chinese capsule, which is little smaller, and has its distinct '3um' sound. However, if I put there 6um bigger one, the difference will be much less--I just don't have one at the moment to try. But my point is--is the second one (modified Nady) is that much worse? IMO, it is just different, and to me the mic sounds more clear and detailed, and in many situations I may choose it over the Neumann.
 
Yeah, but a Neumann has that special Neumann mid.

The second mic is very nice too, but significantly brighter.
 
yeah, but the stock nady track is bad mostly because of the take. i could be wrong....but the stock nady sounded like it was playing with a different guitar with dead strings. sounds really wrong to me.
 
Bad Nady

You are right about the unmodified Nady TCM-1050 clip. The performance is distracting, and the strings were different and old. The other clips were made within a few minutes of each other.

Marik and I recorded clips over a period of a couple weeks just for mic testing purposes, so we didn't try extra hard to make the tests scientifically replicable. We did try harder later on in the process, but there's only so much you can do to standardize this sort of test.

I learned a lot in the process of testing and revising micophones, and I'd like to start a new thread on what I experienced, and what sorts of things Marik changed. I'll try to get that up soon.

I would actually choose the very modified Nady if I could only have one of the large diaphragm, small diaphragm, and ribbon mic's that we tried. It sounds really nicely detailed in the highs and mids, and has nice bass, too, while the K87 capsule'd tube mic sounded a little too smooth or flat, and lacking a tiny bit in transparency or detail. Other people might certainly choose differently.

The original Nady has a kind of fuzz all over the bass that made it thick and overbearing sometimes, and kind of aggresive and ugly highs, and not much good going on in between.

These kinds of things are more informative live than over the internet, but still worth a listen.
 
Bringing back up the Oktava 319 from earlier.

How are you getting a good sound out of that? I'm running mine through a Joe Meek Pre and was recording with Cakewalk Pro Audio 9, just dry vocals, but they're just totally dead no matter what I try.

Of course I just read back and saw you're using a MC 319, whereas mine says MK319...could be a wasted post...eh, if so, smack me...sorry.
 
<Of course I just read back and saw you're using a MC 319, whereas mine says MK319.>

They are the same.
 
Nope, MK319 and MC319 are the same mic. Problem is, none of them are exactly the same. The QC is all over the place and you really have to try them out to get the sound your after. They are all pretty dark but some have more highs than others. I think why a lot of females like them is that they tend to smooth things out a bit without getting muddy. Guys usually want a little added "air" to give them more presence. Just my opinion.

Blessings, Terry
 
I see what you're saying (also read an earlier post about Russian specs / standards being all over the place)...just 'cuz we have the same mic, doesn't mean we have the same mic...and possibly by far. Cool. Thanks for the info, time to find my sledgehammer! hehe...
 
Back
Top