What's yer fave tuner?

  • Thread starter Thread starter apl
  • Start date Start date
attachment.php
attachment.php

I once did a setup like that. It was a lot of work.
 
I once did a setup like that. It was a lot of work.

It takes me FAR less time than trying to tune with a tuner. When I'm changing strings, once I start tuning I have it in tune in about 20-40 seconds (depending on how close I got when I was winding the strings), and if the guitar is already close it takes me 10-15 seconds. It's just a matter of practice. Once you learn how to do it, it is faster and your guitar sounds much better to boot.

Of course, it helps that we have a tuning fork mounted to a spruce box that amplifies it to an audible level.


Light

"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi
 
It takes me FAR less time than trying to tune with a tuner. When I'm changing strings, once I start tuning I have it in tune in about 20-40 seconds (depending on how close I got when I was winding the strings), and if the guitar is already close it takes me 10-15 seconds. It's just a matter of practice. Once you learn how to do it, it is faster and your guitar sounds much better to boot.

Of course, it helps that we have a tuning fork mounted to a spruce box that amplifies it to an audible level.


Light

"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi

I meant setting intonation by ear using harmonics of adjacent strings, back when I didn't have an electronic tuner.
 
I meant setting intonation by ear using harmonics of adjacent strings, back when I didn't have an electronic tuner.

Do you really mean setting intonation or just tuning?
 
attachment.php
attachment.php



Is that working well on stage for ya? :D

It works fine. It takes me less time to tune than it does most people who have tuners, and most of the time on stage I'm tuning to a chord anyway, which electronic tuners are completely incapable of doing. As a result, I actually sound in tune on stage - a rare thing indeed. If I really need to, I can tell a story while I'm tuning, but it doesn't usually take that long.


Light

"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi
 
I meant setting intonation by ear using harmonics of adjacent strings, back when I didn't have an electronic tuner.

Well, for intonation, you already know that I use an old strobe tuner.


Light

"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi
 
It works fine. It takes me less time to tune than it does most people who have tuners, and most of the time on stage I'm tuning to a chord anyway, which electronic tuners are completely incapable of doing. As a result, I actually sound in tune on stage - a rare thing indeed. If I really need to, I can tell a story while I'm tuning, but it doesn't usually take that long.


Light

"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi
Yep, me too. Shall I post that link to the tuning primer I'm always linking too?

Nah, I'll wait til theres more folks here claiming that a tuner is the way to go.

I meant setting intonation by ear using harmonics of adjacent strings, back when I didn't have an electronic tuner.
As gunn pointed out are you setting intonation like this?? Intonation is the process of setting the intervals correctly across the fingerboard so you sound good in all keys. Not exactly "in tune".

Intonation and tuning issues have become the favorite topic of dissent here recently. Really there is nothing to argue about. Myself and light generally work the same way and do things the same, to a point. This despite the fact we have never met and learned our stuff in different countries and workshops. There is a reason for that. Intonation and tuning is a universal thing.

OK here's are those links. Read them. The first is written by Paraglider a member here and explains as well as I could the limitations and advantages of the tuning system we use today. The second is a how to, written by luthiers as a way of explaining round the problem.


https://homerecording.com/bbs/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=2907248
http://www.stagepass.com/tuning.html
 
Oh and I meant to say...


Gotoh 510's every time here. Unless requested to fit something else. All you fancy locking this and that does exactly nada.:D
 
Oh and I meant to say...


Gotoh 510's every time here. Unless requested to fit something else. All you fancy locking this and that does exactly nada.:D

Electronic Tuners are better than a tuning fork.
 
Well, for intonation, you already know that I use an old strobe tuner.


Light

"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi

Me, too. And you were right. I did the ear thing, then a needle tuner, then a tuner in a floor pedal, and a couple of years ago I got StroboSoft. A strobe's the only way to go.
 
As gunn pointed out are you setting intonation like this??

No, no, no. Past tense: I did one by ear with a tuning fork once, maybe more than once, I don't remember. It was a pain. Now I use a strobe.
 
No, no, no. Past tense: I did one by ear with a tuning fork once, maybe more than once, I don't remember. It was a pain. Now I use a strobe.

You don't need a tuner to set intonation. When you set intonation the guitar can be a half tone sharp or flat, doesn't matter as long as it doesn't alter the setup. Bringing the guitar upto pitch and at 440 and in tune across the fingerboard requires a single accurate reference note. Tuning and intonation are separate things.
 
Computers are like, more accurate and stuff?
I'm afraid not in this case. A tuning fork has vibrates at a given frequency, it's fixed. The only way it changes is if you add or subtract more mass. Those tuners you buy in the shop are horribly inaccurate at times. Some are better than others. A strobe tuner being the best.
 
You don't need a tuner to set intonation. When you set intonation the guitar can be a half tone sharp or flat, doesn't matter as long as it doesn't alter the setup. Bringing the guitar upto pitch and at 440 and in tune across the fingerboard requires a single accurate reference note. Tuning and intonation are separate things.

Exactly. I used the tuning fork to set the A string and tuned the rest by harmonics. Then I checked the intonation of one string by sounding the harmonic at the 24th (if there was one) while fretted at the 12th, and comparing that to the seventh fret harmonic of the string below. I adjusted the saddle accordingly and tried again.
 
Exactly. I used the tuning fork to set the A string and tuned the rest by harmonics. Then I checked the intonation of one string by sounding the harmonic at the 24th (if there was one) while fretted at the 12th, and comparing that to the seventh fret harmonic of the string below. I adjusted the saddle accordingly and tried again.

Thats fine of course. The bit you need to be wary of is using the neighbouring string harmonic as a reference when tuning (even when checking intonation adjustments). You run the risk of introducing a small error each time and by the time you get to the top E you have compounded the error to a point where it can be quite noticeable. Get each string intonated correctly, use a tuner or your ear but just reference off that string. Then tune as per the instructions in the GAL article I linked to. The pertinent bit that applies here is this bit.

Here is what all of this means to the guitarist: You must not, at any time, use harmonic tones at the 7th fret as a point of reference (skilled piano tuners could use them because they know how many beats to introduce between 4th and 5th). Harmonic tones at the 7th fret are pure 5ths, while in equal temperament each 5th must be lowered slightly. To tune by harmonics at the 7th fret (as occasionally ill-advised) will make the guitar sound entirely unacceptable on some chord forms.

Give those links a read if you haven't already. They are good and very informative for all guitarists who want to better understand intonation and tuning. The important bit being that a 7th fret harmonic is a pure interval. We want tempered ones. Individually it's only a few cents but compounded across six strings it gets very messy.
 
Back
Top