NL5
Unpossible!
Nakatira said:Here`s my take on it Tim.
Man I think it sounds beautifull either way
http://www.lightningmp3.com/live/file.php?fid=5105
Nice, very Nice......
Nice, very Nice......
T
travelin travis
New member
Sounds awesome Tim. I agree with what rayc said.......sounds like it's in a empty (possibly open ceiling or walls) tiled space.
X
XLR
______
jpw23 – Another good one. Verb is king!
NL5 – Yeah, I’m listening more to Naka’s work on it and liking it more with each listen.
Travis – Thanks. Much appreciated.
Timverb
NL5 – Yeah, I’m listening more to Naka’s work on it and liking it more with each listen.
Travis – Thanks. Much appreciated.
Timverb
myhatbroke
Cocktacular Member
No one likes mine 
X
XLR
______
I liked yours. And it takes balls to go first.
Tim
Tim
jpw23
New member
myhatbroke said:No one likes mine
It was not bad....just not what he was looking for
jpw23
New member
Timothy Lawler said:jpw23 – Another good one. Verb is king!
NL5 – Yeah, I’m listening more to Naka’s work on it and liking it more with each listen.
Travis – Thanks. Much appreciated.
Timverb
I used some old blue plugs on this....reverb and stereo......old directx stuff
X
XLR
______
I have those. I always thought the Blueline verb sounded pretty good. And the stereo enhancer sounds better than Ozone to me. What were your settings?jpw23 said:
Tim
R
RAMI
Guest
OK...I'm finally around to listen to this...Which version am I supposed to listen to???
jpw23
New member
to tell the truth.....I don't know...just moved the sliders around till I found something I likedTimothy Lawler said:
R
RAMI
Guest
Hey...Finally!!! Someone that works the same I do. I knew I liked you for some reason.jpw23 said:to tell the truth.....I don't know...just moved the sliders around till I found something I liked
myhatbroke
Cocktacular Member
Ok so when you record acoustic, do you do two takes of the exact same thing or do you copy and paste the same recording onto two different tracks and pan hard left and right. Or what is the technique to make it sound wide, because I noticed that acoustic recordings sound real wide.
mshilarious
Banned
myhatbroke said:
Well, for starters, you use two microphones . . .
CIRO
Eu mesmo
myhatbroke said:
Tim uses another technique on his song, as Mshilarious said, he uses two mics (don´t know if pans hard, probably yes)
Copy / paste sucks!
You will have serious phase issues, don´t works (even with very hard and radical eq).
(Ok, You even can try as an experience , but I personally never had good results trying it).
Ciro
Last edited:
Nakatira
That Norwegian Bastard
Timothy Lawler said:
Hi Tim, sorry for not responding sooner.
I took an early nap yesterday due to extensive rehearsing and working.
I started out with a verb called Native verb, I got it through a native bundle.
When I first started using it I never quit, I`ve tried loads of other verbs but this is my fave one.
any way I tried it first on your track and It felt like I was sitting right nexzt to you guitar in a big room, dident capture the distance.
Untill; I remembered a popular 70`s reverb technique, wich I first heard on Thick as a Brick by Jethro Tull.
I duplicated your stereo track so that I had two.
Did one clean and one at 80% wet.
Lowered the volume on the dry one, and panned them 25 or so to each side.
Hearing that you liked it makes me proud, and honoured.
thanks a lot Tim.
rayc
retroreprobate
MHBroke,
I thought yours sound good'n'cosmic - but I'm a reverb addict trying to "dry" out.
Nak's sounds really silky. Most other folk have done well too. I've not attempted because I know no subtlty.
I thought yours sound good'n'cosmic - but I'm a reverb addict trying to "dry" out.
Nak's sounds really silky. Most other folk have done well too. I've not attempted because I know no subtlty.
X
XLR
______
Rami – Well, the good news is that the tune’s just 40 seconds. Maybe just listen to the unprocessed version and throw some verb at it.
Jpw -
Myhatbroke -
Nakatira – Thanks for the info. Great technique. What I like about it is that the clarity of the original attack is preserved but the percussiveness of the string attack is made to sound more distant. Native verb... that's TC Electronics, right?
Rayc -
Tim
Jpw -
Ha… I do the same. Too much note taking kills the fun. One of the things I like about Wavelab is the master section preset list where you can save plugin combinations without getting bogged down in saving individual presets.
Myhatbroke -
The mic setup I used has some width to the sound since the mic’s were 7 or so inches apart. The mic’s were recorded hard panned L and R and kept that way in the mp3. Stereo verb tends to increase the L/R differences - the Room Machine plug did a lot of that on my first run at the processing in the original post. Copying and pasting a mono guitar track, delaying one side 20 ms or so and using different EQ on each can sound good too but it’s less realistic. And as Ciro said, it can cause phase problems and that can turn into a real headache later.
Nakatira – Thanks for the info. Great technique. What I like about it is that the clarity of the original attack is preserved but the percussiveness of the string attack is made to sound more distant. Native verb... that's TC Electronics, right?
Rayc -
Ha, that’s too funny Ray.
Tim
Last edited:
Nakatira
That Norwegian Bastard
Yeah Tim; I forgot all about to mention that.
I generally just call it Native, it might get confused with native instruments.
So TC it is.
Btw It took your tune to discover the new technique.
I just thought, Might as well give it a shot, I`m just thrilled it worked out the way it did.
cant wait to try it out on backing vox
I generally just call it Native, it might get confused with native instruments.
So TC it is.
Btw It took your tune to discover the new technique.
I just thought, Might as well give it a shot, I`m just thrilled it worked out the way it did.
cant wait to try it out on backing vox
B
bigbubba
New member
The processed one sounds like a spanish movie soundtrack like the opening creds or something. Really really sounds like it's telling a story - somewhat laidback, sunny, bright, slow day....Timothy Lawler said:
Anyhoo, the raw one just sounds good. It's the playing first and foremost that just simply sounds great.
I'll try to give it a shot.
B
bigbubba
New member
Here's my experiment.
http://www.lightningmp3.com/live/file.php?fid=5118
Have listened to all and like all versions as stand alone. But some don't sound as the customer (Tim) has requested.
This is actually a really neat idea to just give your vision and let others try and match it. When I'm working my tracks, I don't end up with what I envisioned. Along the way I'll be using other FX chains that I start liking and end up with something else that I equally like. But this is a good exercise in having a vision and completing it.
http://www.lightningmp3.com/live/file.php?fid=5118
Have listened to all and like all versions as stand alone. But some don't sound as the customer (Tim) has requested.
This is actually a really neat idea to just give your vision and let others try and match it. When I'm working my tracks, I don't end up with what I envisioned. Along the way I'll be using other FX chains that I start liking and end up with something else that I equally like. But this is a good exercise in having a vision and completing it.