L
lucky13
New member
This is like one of thos pol-dick-ical threads in the cave...I love it.
BTW djhead, you forgot the best Phoenix dj- Z Trip!
BTW djhead, you forgot the best Phoenix dj- Z Trip!
djhead said:So what I said, basically? I never said it doesnt influence, merely said music cannot be held accountable for theactions of its listeners as it is merely an observation.
Music is art. Art conveys and portrays but is never direcly linked to the human condition. It is only a perception of it. That being said how can anyone's creation of sonic input have anything to do with morality?
I wouldn't even if I thought It did not. All music influences. All art influences. but ther can and should be no accountability or lack of credibility for a genre based on the actions of its disciples. It should be judged as music, and as art. Music is defined as:
fraserhutch said:Right here:
And I disagree that there cannot be accountability. Who says it cannot? You?
If music influences, then it can be accountable for that influence.
fraserhutch said:Right here:
And I disagree that there cannot be accountability. Who says it cannot? You?
If music influences, then it can be accountable for that influence.
I'm on the fence with video games myself (which is sorta ironic).MISTERQCUE said:Does the same hold true for violent video games?![]()
(sorry for taking this to another direction)
Just curious.
djhead said:I will admit that I have confused myself. Only because I re-read what I wrote and get lost. So score one for you ace!
To rephrase, Music is art, which like all art, remarks and communicates the human condition. I see no evidence that would support any sort of morality inherent in art. Maybe comments on the state of morality or the presence of it, but no actual morality inherent in art. My opinion is that it is simply a vessel the artist uses to express themselves, which in essence is a view, and therefore biased, and therefore neither moral nor immoral.
I DO say there cannot be accountability, not that I am anyone special, its just my opinion. It would be wrong to hold artists accountable for the effects there art has on the masses because participation in said art is a choice. Listening to that song, seeing that play, observing that mime, its all a choice. Whether we like it or not, we choose what influences us, be it through need to stay in the status quo, please our eardrums, or sooth our spiritual side. Given that this IS a choice, the blame is soley in the hands of the partaker, not the artist, IMHO.
I think what you are getting at is social responsibility.
Oh yeah, lucky, Ztrip founded BSDJ's with Emile and one other guy, who i forget. Nice guys. Ztrip was the one who started turntable notation. He has his master's in it, i believe.
My thoughts exactly (kind of).fraserhutch said:I'm on the fence with video games myself (which is sorta ironic).
However, I personally don't believe that video games wield influence anywhere near the degree that music does.
Hey.....I contributed a whole bunch of words here.....you just need to assemble them yourself....bigwillz24 said:Blah, Blah, Blah blabity bla bla bla...
That pretty much sums up this thread minus a couple posts by Q.
Dogman said:If music and video games made a difference, all you would need to be very afraid of me....I have all the bad shoot-em-up games, and all the evil music. I would be Soilent Green....
Some guys go crazy with videogames. You know, some thing stick in your brain and make you "bad". Look what happened in Columbine.fraserhutch said:However, I personally don't believe that video games wield influence anywhere near the degree that music does.
killthepixel said:Some guys go crazy with videogames. You know, some thing stick in your brain and make you "bad". Look what happened in Columbine.
djhead said:![]()
You aren't seriously blaming Columbine on video games are you?