
beezelbubba
Shitty Buddhist
Again?........Cyrokk said:If I agreed any more my head would be just above your colon.
Again?........Cyrokk said:If I agreed any more my head would be just above your colon.
If I agreed any more my head would be just above your colon.
orson198305 said:I think when you're younger, you want to follow your heros, you see the guitar they use and you think "cool, i want to be him". You buy it (even although it's a cheap copy) then depending on whether its a gibson or fender type guitar you follow on in that fashion. It's a sort of safe zone. I've been using fenders all my life, bought loads of effects and tried out different amps to try and get a "different" sound. I didn't even think about trying a gibson guitar, it just didn't enter my mind. Mabad![]()
cephus said:I'm sure a vast majority of les paul guys wouldn't use anything else. I was just wondering of there are any les paul guys that got tired of the 14-pounder around the neck and have learned to make due with a humbucker-equipped strat.
Being a strat guy, I'd think that if you put humbuckers on there, you could get a B- in the Les Paul blindfold test as far as it sounds to the LISTENER - at least for standard-issue rock and roll. I know a Les Paul plays alot different from a strat, so are there any aftermarket necks that can help a hard tail strat get a passing grade from the PLAYER?
There have been alot of guys in the past that seem to have tried to turn a strat into a Paul, and the new sam ash junk mail has a couple attempts from Fender and other manufacturers. Do the Les Paul lovers absolutely detest these guitars, seeing it as a bicyclish copy of their Harley Wide Glide?
Can a strat-style guitar be tarted up to be a lighter-weight, battle-ready, way-cheaper Les Paul stand in, or, as is it true, as my friend used to say, that "you can't polish a turd"?
hotshotup said:I guarantee everyone who says they hate strats is under 25, strats are like fine wine and need to be appreciated and the younger generation of kids playing today don't understand where their music came from and part of that history involves the strat. I used to not understand all the hubub when I was younger, but now that I'm a little older I get it. Man I wish I held on to some of those. But I'm not faulting them for it, it's not their fault, it's the media and culture that guides them, but I'll bet when they get a little older, that if they're still playing music, that they will have a different view. Not everyone of course, some just never will like the feel of one and thats personal, but the majority i'll bet will have a different outlook, and it'll start when they start to trace where their music came from. just my opinion though.
ggunn said:A Strat is a Strat and a Paul a Paul, and never the twain shall meet.
cephus said:I'm sure a vast majority of les paul guys wouldn't use anything else. I was just wondering of there are any les paul guys that got tired of the 14-pounder around the neck and have learned to make due with a humbucker-equipped strat.
Being a strat guy, I'd think that if you put humbuckers on there, you could get a B- in the Les Paul blindfold test as far as it sounds to the LISTENER - at least for standard-issue rock and roll. I know a Les Paul plays alot different from a strat, so are there any aftermarket necks that can help a hard tail strat get a passing grade from the PLAYER?
There have been alot of guys in the past that seem to have tried to turn a strat into a Paul, and the new sam ash junk mail has a couple attempts from Fender and other manufacturers. Do the Les Paul lovers absolutely detest these guitars, seeing it as a bicyclish copy of their Harley Wide Glide?
Can a strat-style guitar be tarted up to be a lighter-weight, battle-ready, way-cheaper Les Paul stand in, or, as is it true, as my friend used to say, that "you can't polish a turd"?