Tascam 388 Fader/VU/Actual Output differences

  • Thread starter Thread starter frcake
  • Start date Start date
You have to remove the bottom panel, remove the knobs from the channel you want to service, *carefully* remove the BUSS PCB that spans across the bottom of all the mixing section PCBs, unscrew the channel’s fader, unplug any other connections, remove all the pot nuts for the channel on the top panel, and you should be able to remove the PCB from the chassis, or at least get it out enough to service the pots.
Ok cards are out of the machine, super carefully.

There are a couple different passages or holes in the pot body into which you can inject the cleaning agent. And I really recommend DeoxIT F5. It cleans and protects and lubricates carbon element potentiometers without stripping the shaft lubricant.
Ok I sprayed the following locations:
20260628_151339.webp


20260628_151359.webp


Now the problems:
All the potentiometers feel great except for the Even/Odd and the EQ Level pots.

From looking at them, they appear to be a different type of potentiometer than the rest of the console. All the other pots still have a smooth, well-lubricated feel, whereas these feel noticeably different.

I'm currently working on channel 8 and stopped before continuing so I could ask for some advice.

The Even/Odd and EQ Level pots feel as though they've lost their lubrication. You can actually feel the increased friction as you turn them. What's interesting is that they never felt quite the same as the other pots to begin with. Even on the channels I haven't sprayed yet, these particular pots have always felt slightly rougher than the rest.

Teslanol T6, claims to provide the necessary lubrication. I've since ordered DeoxIT F5, but after reading various discussions online, I've come across several reports suggesting that even F5 can wash away the original lubricant inside certain potentiometers.

I've also bought some Caig FaderGrease. Would it make sense to open these pots, apply fresh lubricant, and try to restore their original feel? Or is there a better approach?
 
Last edited:
Do you want smooth feel, or silent, crackle free operation? My experience is that pot cleaning is often the sort of thing people do before selling them, because it rarely lasts. The actual problem is actual wear. you have a carbon disk and a wiper and after years, the surface deteriorates and the extra pressure from the wiper deforms the track under it when it never moves. If you can remove and dismantle, then you can clean properly. Pots are in many ways, like video heads. Solvent, that softens and allows debris to be wiped off works very well, if the solvent is sprayed under pressure, then the loosened debris gets relocated somewhere less critical. You can use a cleaning tape, but all they do is wipe the surface clean but leave most of the rubbish in place, where it rehardens. Despite what people claim, the hand test does it for me, before I squirt it in holes. I put it on the palm of my hand, wait a few minutes and see if it totally vanishes. WD40 always leaves behind a slippery residue. Isopropyl alcohol does not. A few years back I managed to buy on amazon some empty plastic bottles with the long very thin tube - designed, I think, for thin superglue. Guitar folk use them for running down the side of frets. I put IPA into these and then poked the thin tube into the little access holes in difficult to reach pots, then a hefty squeeze and the 'schluch' seemed to do the trick. Brand new fader are not as far as I know, lubricated - the carbon has a very low coefficient of friction - it's naturally slippery. Any form of grease seems a very short term 'cure'. Any lubricant is naturally sticky - the whole point is to create a barrier between surfaces. Exactly the opposite of what you need. I'm involved in a historic lighting equipment collection and we have lighting desks with hundreds and hundreds of faders. Best success is something to remove oxidisation on the metal on metal versions and simple gentle cleaning and solvent on the carbon faders. Clearly, many of donations have been 'cleaned' with products very unsuitable. Some cleaning has actually badly damaged the tracks - some of the cleaning chemicals seem to have soaked into the carbon. One appears to have been lubricated with Vaseline petroleum jelly. I actually tried that. amazingly it worked. Three weeks later (in the winter), the fader would hardly move. No actual damage, but I have seen that suggested as a fix on audio pots and faders far too often.

I worked for a while in TV and videos were lidless, in a rack (Panasonic MII) and we used a substance called colclene - recommended on the can for being suitable for guided missiles. It was alochol with additives and was amazing stuff, but the additives are banned now. Shame! The current product is not the same.
 
Back
Top