Setting up a Mackie 1202 for a SM-57 (nylon strings)

  • Thread starter Thread starter underp
  • Start date Start date
U

underp

Member
How should i setup a "mackie 1202" to get the most perfect sound of my guitar using a SM-57 ?

Maybe a stupid question, but i'm just asking, because i hear my recordings like LOW FIDELITY sounds, i don't know why.

maybe knowing the correct settings, i will stop fuc#ing around with the EQ.

the 1202 MS ( does not have "mid settings" ).

i just want to know the settings for:

Trim
Lo
Hi
VU meter
Master Volume
 
underp said:
How should i setup a "mackie 1202" to get the most perfect sound of my guitar using a SM-57 ?

i just want to know the settings for:

Trim
Lo
Hi
VU meter
Master Volume

Two problems here: I can't get a good nylon string sound with a 57. It just ain't a good mic for that. But 7 years ago that was all I had too . . .

Problem #2 is that you need to worry more about setting up your mic properly than EQ settings, and it's hard to tell somebody else how to set EQ without hearing their setup.

Try this:

Put the mic about 12-18" away from the 12th fret. Now for me that's too close, but 57s aren't real sensitive, so you'll probably have to stay close. If you can get away with it, back away to 2-3', but for that you're gonna need a good souding room with no extraneous noises plus enough clean gain at the mixer. If you ain't got that, stay close.

Setting for the VU meter I presume you mean the channel fader. Set that at unity (+0dB). Next set the EQs flat, and raise the trim until your average level is about +0dB on the meter, and no peaks clip.

Totally wild guess for EQ: +3dB on treble. If the sound is too boomy, try moving the mic more towards the neck. If all else fails, cut bass -3dB. But you gotta use your own ears and experiment.

Master volume should be set wherever you need it to feed the next device in your chain. If that's your soundcard, make sure the level isn't so high it clips the converters in the soundcard.
 
to be honest, that was the type of answer that i was looking for. Thanks a lot man.

but there's still something that i don't understand.

18'', is like 45cm away from the 12th fret. Are you sure, this is to close?

should i use just 1mic, right in front of the 12th fret ?

What about the TRIM setting ?

------------------------------------------------------

Well, sorry about the abuse, but can you tell me a good setup for a good sounding voice ? ( SM-58 ), and how far should i sing from the mic. Cause i don't have any condenser right now.

Sorry for the bad english.
 
I don't think you can record anything at 18" away with a 57. You will need sooooo much gain it won't be worth it.

Don't know what to tell you. Its a good mic. I like the sound my 58 does to my acoustic. But you have a nylon so thats another story.

Try micing the soundhole at only a couple inches away so you can get the volume with out the extra preamp gain. You will need to EQ it probably as there will most likely be loads of low frequency, but thats all I can think of right now.
 
Outlaws said:
I don't think you can record anything at 18" away with a 57. You will need sooooo much gain it won't be worth it.

You're going to need a lot of gain no matter what.

I just set this up as a quick experiment. With a 1/4 scale nylon-string guitar (which is much quieter than a full size, don't have one of those anymore) and the 57 at 18", I needed about +60dB of gain for quiet fingerpicking and about +50dB for fingernail strumming. Figure you'd need about -6dB less than me with a real guitar. Also I don't have fingernails anymore, so if you have them that will help.

As for distance, going to 3' would require another +6dB; 9" would give you back -6dB. To get another -6dB you'd have to be at 4.5" which is pretty uncomfortable.

I'll guess your mixer pre is designed for around +55-60dB of gain, so you'll be pushing the limit. Check your manual.

The 57 manual shows that the 57 is about -15dB less sensitive than a typical condenser, which is why condensers are used for acoustic guitar. Also, looking at the 57's frequency response, I note that it's brighter than I remembered, so forget that treble +3dB advice.

You can change the tone a lot by moving the mic. 12th fret minimizes the boom; I personally wouldn't mic the soundhole, but that will give you more volume. Micing the bridge can yield an interesting tone.


As for voice on the 58: that's much easier. Depends on how loud you sing, and whether or not you want the proximity effect--you get an enhanced bass response if you get real close. For a loud singer that doesn't need bass, I like it about 6" away, slightly above the mouth (breath pops tend to go down). For a singer who needs to get close, I get about 2" away and slightly to the side (which has the same effect as slightly above, but it feels weird with a mic in your nose, so I go to the side). EQ on 58 vocals can +3dB bass if you need still more warmth. If you need more treble, try using the 57 instead (but not for close micing).

The TRIM knob is the preamp gain control.
 
mshilarious said:
The TRIM knob is the preamp gain control.

Umm......Right. But I was speaking in flat out layman terms.

Plus it is interchangeable anyways. :p
 
Here's the reason of why i get so stressed every time i mic something.

In this test, i'm using an acoustic Guitar ( not nylon ), with these settings:

---------------------------------

SM-57 Direct

Trim = Full Trim = Full
Hi = +5 Hi = -5
Lo = -5 Lo= 0
Gain= Center Gain= Center


---------------------------------


check the difference, micing the acosutic guitar, and recording directly.

Direct:

micing:
 
If you need to go much past 12:00 on the trim you're gonna get a harsh-sounding recording out of the Mackie, IMHO. That's been my experience anyway. The pres in my 1402 just don't sound good at all when pushed.

When you say "direct", are you using the insert patched to the first "click"? Using the direct out will bypass the 1202 summing amps, which aren't very good.

Also, I wouldn't use the EQ on the Mackie at all, unless it is to cut. Use the low-cut filter if you're getting too much boominess or rumble.

Time to look into a LDC with a little more "umph" than the 57.
 
I have a pretty decent console....
a mic used for guitar recordings...
a good mic placement.....
and i can't get a decent sound ?

cause i'm not getting a decent sound, i'm getting a horrible sound.

are you sure, that i'm not missing something ?, got to be something that i'm not doing, i don't know.
 
The 1202 is an entry-level board.

And a 57 might do wonders on an amp, but it's really stretching it to use on a nylon guitar.
 
Yeah, that sounds like a 57. It's still boomy even with the bass cut, so I'd move the mic further from the soundhole towards the neck.

One thing in both versions that sounds out is the large amount of string noise from sliding. Try different strings and work on technique. I'm not sure why the noise is there on the direct version with the big treble cut, but it is.

Direct is slightly louder, but there isn't enough gain in either version even although I can see you've maxed out on trim.

I'd recommend looking for an inexpensive small diaphragm condenser rather than large for micing acoustic guitar.
 
I didn't listen to the clips. I'm just relaying some pertenent info.
 
underp said:
I have a pretty decent console....
a mic used for guitar recordings...
a good mic placement.....
and i can't get a decent sound ?

cause i'm not getting a decent sound, i'm getting a horrible sound.

are you sure, that i'm not missing something ?, got to be something that i'm not doing, i don't know.

You have an okay mixer and a good mic for loud sources. To use a dynamic mic on a quiet source you need a lot of clean gain and the Mackie just isn't really good enough for that kind of task. I doubt any preamp under $500 a channel is.

You would have much better luck with a decent condensor mic on acoustic guitar. They have a wider frequency response, are more sensitive and put out a much hotter signal so the preamp doesn't have to work so hard.
 
Back
Top