Sequencer efficiency for live use

[progmr]

Hello:

I'm using my laptop (HP w/XP-PRO, 1.8 ghz amd turion/2gb ram/7200rpm hd) for live performances via firepod. Since I use up to 4 instruments in a given night I need a sort of "virtual mixer" that allows access to all 8 channels on my firepod so that I can control the levels and mute what I'm not using. Currently I'm using Cubase SX to interface with Guitar Rig2 (guitars / analog sax) and Reason 3 (my windsynth). My original setup used an analog mixer with the mains going out to a single channel on the firepod but the setup was a little too noisy for me.

My question is that since my needs are very basic I might be wasting resources using Cubase. I'd like to know if there are other software applications that are more efficient CPU wise for my setup.

Thank you for your advice and expertise.

 

[sajs]

I use PowerTracks for my sequencer program. It's only $49 and does the job quite well. I've never had to go to the manual, it's that easy to use and they have a great helpful forum:
http://www.pgmusic.com/powertracks.htm

 

[altitude909]

cubase is the last DAW program i would use live (and I use it for my main sequencer)

Look at Ableton live or Forte Ensemble, they are made for live use

 

[studiomaster]

What makes the cubase not suitable for live use?

 

[altitude909]

I suppose if you layout your whole set as one track you will be fine, but do you honestly want to stop everything and load a new track after every song?