SansAmp Bass Driver DI

  • Thread starter Thread starter csebree
  • Start date Start date
C

csebree

New member
Does any one have any experience with this? I'm considering purchasing this for my studio and was wondering if it could be used for both active and passive basses. The tech 21 site doesn't say. I don't even know if there is a difference in DI boxes for active or passive basses but it seems like I heard that there is. Anyone know for sure?
 
The bass driver works well, but doesn't give you a wide variety of tones....

Bruce
 
Many have sung the praise of the SansAmp Bass Driver and I picked one up several years ago. I was fairly disapointed at first as it seemed to me to have an overly processesed and almost "phased" sound that was none to warm.

Then I bought an ART TubePac and ran the SansAmp into it and got very warm sweet bass mmmmm. I don't have much to compare it with though and I am still stuck in budget four track cassette land so take that in consideration concerning my review but I have recorded in four local pro and semi-pro studio's in Oklahoma City and never got anything that sounded as good as the SansAmp and TubePac combo.

RE: active and passive into the SansAmp Bass DI it and all DI boxes I know of will work equally well with the SansAmp.
Many bass amps have seperate inputs for active and passive basses that may include seperate signal paths (or just a pad) to better match the lower impedance and higher gain of an active bass and to decrease distortion/overload.

These came out way before the current crop of modelers and amp simulators (ie POD, V-Amp, Line 6 etc) and in comparison it offers little in variety of tones from the same bass but it can be usefull. Personally I am a happy man live with one very good warm basic tone and look to technique and minimal effects for adding variety to my parts. I also enjoy achieving more of a live feel in my recordings than your more esoteric studio production sounds right now so I am not looking for a huge amount of tonal options in by bass tone if you know what I mean.

If you want alot of variety of tonal options with one DI box and one bass this would not be your ticket. If you just want a simple but usefull and fairly inexpensive DI box for bass this may do it for you and it can run off battery (9v), walwart or phantom power, has a seperate bypass output jack and ground lift. It is also dependable and is usefull for live and studio work.
 
I only heard this thing once, but for the price it seems great for going direct to a mixer...I'd definitely use it over a digital box...i believe it will run off phantom power from mixer...i want to get one , when i have the money....you can do a lot of sound shaping once you have a good tone recorded...
 
It definately gives your tone a little bit more of a bass cabinet sound than going direct. It's a subtle difference but important. The "presense" control is worth the $125 alone (or whatever they run for now). I do agree that this unit really wants to be run into a pre. Running it direct to your machine doesn't produce a big sound....and always use phantom power or change batteries often.

Slackmaster 2000
 
Back
Top