J
Jack Hammer
New member
So here is the rub. I could purchase a PCM 91 but...an MPX1 has been highly recommended. In the meantime, there was an MPX 500 that now seems to have morphed into the 550 though I don't know if anyone has them yet. I really don't know what to do. Is it simply better to get the top of the line or "industry standard" device and build from there. Or, on the other hand, should that amount of money be used to purchase a greater variety of gear that does more. I looked at the Lexicn sight which had some reviews. Though the 500 is gone, the reviewers loved it and I suppose this would also be true of the 550. The reviewers also loved the MPX1.
I tend to think of the subject this way. The pros for a PCM 91 is that it is the de facto industry standard. It will retain its value the best, attract customers to my studio (assuming I want any but that is another story for another time) and, I assume it will give be sound better than the less expensive devices.
Cons - Cost, not stereo, expensive, that amount of money can purchase an MPX1 and a 550 or a TC M-One or possible an MPX1 a MPX 550 and the card based UAD plug-ins of the Real Pro Reverb (I think that is the name) LA2A, 1176, etc.
What would you do and why.
P.S. How 'bout some help here fellas (and gals), a little of the dazzling expertise would be nice right about now.
I tend to think of the subject this way. The pros for a PCM 91 is that it is the de facto industry standard. It will retain its value the best, attract customers to my studio (assuming I want any but that is another story for another time) and, I assume it will give be sound better than the less expensive devices.
Cons - Cost, not stereo, expensive, that amount of money can purchase an MPX1 and a 550 or a TC M-One or possible an MPX1 a MPX 550 and the card based UAD plug-ins of the Real Pro Reverb (I think that is the name) LA2A, 1176, etc.
What would you do and why.
P.S. How 'bout some help here fellas (and gals), a little of the dazzling expertise would be nice right about now.